Global healthcare systems seek to achieve the overriding objectives of promoting care quality, affordability, accessibility, and timeliness. These priority areas validate the need the incorporate advanced technologies when delivering patient-centered and coordinated care.
Although technologies increase process efficiency, accuracy, timeliness, and convenience, the underlying social determinants of health, such as geographical factors, built environment, and poverty, result in health inequalities.
As a result, telehealth technology emerges as a profound tool for intercepting sources of health disparities by bridging distance gaps and providing alternatives for care coordination, interdisciplinary team collaboration, and the overall healthcare organization.
This annotated bibliography provides insights into the role of telemedicine technology in promoting patient satisfaction, interdisciplinary team collaboration, care coordination, and productivity. Also, it expounds on organizational factors that influence the incorporation of telehealth in daily care practices.
Often, health problems such as high disease prevalence, limited access to quality care, and delays in care provision are disproportionate to low-income populations and rural communities.
As a result, it is essential to address these challenges by transforming care delivery mechanisms and adopting technologies that offer cheaper, faster, and more convenient alternatives.
Eventually, telehealth technology improves care coordination and provision by enabling caregivers to conduct distant services such as medication administration, diagnostics, vital sign monitoring, and e-consultations (Kichloo et al., 2020).
The current literature supports the plausibility of incorporating telemedicine technology in promoting care quality, affordability, timeliness, and convenience. For instance, I selected four scholarly articles from reputable databases such as Elsevier, SAGE, and BMJ to develop an annotated bibliography regarding telehealth technology.
Further, I used keywords such as telehealth benefits, telehealth technology, care coordination, and telehealth barriers to select credible sources. Finally, I applied the CRAAP (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose) test to assess the sources’ credibility in providing insights into the importance of telemedicine.
Kichloo, A., Albosta, M., Dettloff, K., Wani, F., El-Amir, Z., Singh, J., Aljadah, M., Chakinala, R. C., Kanugula, A. K., Solanki, S., & Chugh, S. (2020). Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and the future: A narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000530
In this scholarly article, Kichloo et al. (2020) conducted a narrative review to examine the current state of telemedicine utilization amid the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on care accessibility. The researchers define telehealth as “a service that seeks to improve a patient’s health by permitting two-way, real-time interactive communication between the patient and the physician at a distant site” (p. 1).
In this sense, telehealth utilizes telecommunication and information technology (IT) to bolster access to health assessment, diagnosis, interventions, consultation, supervision, and information across distances. Kichloo et al. (2020) reviewed a 2019 report by the Pew Research Center, which indicates that 90% of Americans can access the Internet while 81% of Americans use smartphones. The recent increase in mobile technologies and usage facilitates telehealth effectiveness.
The researchers conclude that telehealth allows caregivers to collaborate with patients to provide high-quality care while maintaining physical distance to prevent COVID-19 transmission. The researchers argue that Americans spend an average of 123 minutes per clinical visit, with an average face-to-face time with a physician of 20.5 minutes.
Telemedicine appointments eliminate travel and waiting times and save patients an average of $19-$121 per visit (Kichloo et al., 2020, p. 6). As a result, the study supports the contention that telehealth technology increases care convenience, timeliness, and affordability, especially for patients in rural areas.
Davidson, R., Barrett, D. I., Rixon, L., & Newman, S. (2020). How the integration of telehealth and coordinated care approaches impact health care service organization structure and ethos: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Nursing, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2196/20282
In this scholarly study, Davidson et al. (2020) conducted a multinational project to explore the use of coordinated care and telehealth. The study’s objective was to assess how healthcare organizations’ setup influences the perceptions and experience of service managers and frontline staff during the development and deployment of integrated care with and without telehealth.
According to Davidson et al. (2020), telehealth and telecare are assistive technologies that support coordinated care of patients with social care needs or chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease.
In this sense, these technologies enable information exchange between agencies, remote health status monitoring, and reduce hospital visits, curtailing care costs.
Despite these potential benefits of telehealth, various factors, including lack of managerial knowledge, nurses’ shortage, and underfunded social care services, compromise the technology’s effectiveness. The researchers propose continuous organizational evolution as a way of improving telehealth technology.
Above, the research reveals a positive correlation between telehealth technology and effective care coordination, improved performance, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
The interviewed frontline staff members supported the idea of implementing telehealth based on the level of patient involvement in coordinated care (P<.001) tailored training to support telehealth and care coordination (p<.0001) (Davidson et al., 2020, p. 6). As a result, it is a credible evidence source that supports the topic.
Gajarawala, S. N., & Pelkowski, J. N. (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
In this article, Gajarawala and Pelkowski (2021) focus on telehealth benefits and potential barriers. They define telehealth as a “subset of e-health and the use of telecommunication technology in health care delivery, information, and education” (p. 218).
Further, the researchers contend that telehealth technology supports various components of telemedicine, including medical education, remote patient monitoring, patient consultation via videoconferencing, wireless health applications, and transmission of imaging and medical reports (Gajarawala & Pelkowski, 2021, p. 218).
The original idea of implementing telehealth technology was to provide quality and convenient care to rural and underserved patients. However, the technology proves effective and successful in multiple medication specialties and settings.
According to Gajarawala & Pelkowski (2021), telehealth provides access to resources and care for patients in rural areas where caregiver shortages are prevalent. The technology improves efficiency without higher net cost, reduces patient travel and wait time, and allows for comparable or improved quality of care (Gajarawala & Pelkowski, 2021).
However, organizations should ensure data accuracy, promote patient privacy and confidentiality, and curtail fraud to ensure the technology’s applicability and effectiveness. This study validates the essence of transforming organizational culture to assimilate telehealth technology.
Neville, C. W. (2018). Telehealth: A balanced look at incorporating this technology into practice. SAGE Open Nursing, 4, 237796081878650. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960818786504
The scholarly article explores the use of telehealth and the ability to provide healthcare services to patients through interactive technology and telecommunication tools (Neville, 2018).
The researcher argues that telehealth includes various routes of care delivery, including patient consultations through teleconferencing, image transmission, e-health patient portals, vital sign remote monitoring, consumer-focused wireless applications, and continued medical education.
These multiple care delivery mechanisms translate to benefits such as telesurgery/remote robotic surgery, timely interdisciplinary team collaboration and communication, cost reduction by reducing clinical visits, and access to healthcare professionals, services, and improved care.
However, Neville (2018) identifies multiple organizational factors as barriers to effective telehealth utilization. For instance, the article identifies legal and ethical compliance, fraud, privacy, and malpractice liability as potential barriers to telehealth’s effectiveness.
Also, Neville (2018) argues that telehealth implementation is a cost-intensive process due to the overhead costs of software, hardware, and other communication devices. As a result, this study offers a two-sided perspective on telehealth, making it a credible and reliable evidence source for the topic.
Despite the underlying barriers to telehealth’s effectiveness, the current literature links the technology with improved care quality, enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration and productivity, patient satisfaction, and care coordination.
However, health organizations should transform their culture and sustain norms that support telehealth. For instance, staff training and adequate resource allocations can improve telehealth by bolstering employees’ knowledge of the essentials for telehealth technology and enhancing successful implementation.
Further, health institutions need to transform privacy policies to prevent fraud and other cybersecurity threats from utilizing virtual platforms.
Finally, organizations should collaborate with government agencies to adopt appropriate reimbursement models to reduce the cost burden of installing software, hardware, and other devices pertinent to telehealth.
Davidson, R., Barrett, D. I., Rixon, L., & Newman, S. (2020). How the integration of telehealth and coordinated care approaches impact health care service organization structure and ethos: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Nursing, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/20282
Gajarawala, S. N., & Pelkowski, J. N. (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
Kichloo, A., Albosta, M., Dettloff, K., Wani, F., El-Amir, Z., Singh, J., Aljadah, M., Chakinala, R. C., Kanugula, A. K., Solanki, S., & Chugh, S. (2020). Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and the future: A narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000530
Neville, C. W. (2018). Telehealth: A balanced look at incorporating this technology into practice. SAGE Open Nursing, 4, 237796081878650. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960818786504
Write a 4-6 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. Before you begin to develop the assessment you are encouraged to complete the Annotated Bibliography Formative Assessment.
Completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment and counts towards course engagement. Rapid changes in information technology go hand-in-hand with progress in quality health care delivery, nursing practice, and interdisciplinary team collaboration. The following are only a few examples of how the health care field uses technology to provide care to patients across multiple settings:
Technology is essential to the advancement of the nursing profession, maintaining quality care outcomes, patient safety, and research. This assessment will give you the opportunity to deepen your knowledge of how technology can enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.
You will prepare an annotated bibliography on technology in nursing. A well-prepared annotated bibliography is a comprehensive commentary on the content of scholarly publications and other sources of evidence about a selected nursing-related technology.
A bibliography of this type provides a vehicle for workplace discussion to address nursing practice gaps and improve patient care outcomes.
As nurses become more accountable in their practice, they are being called upon to expand their caregiver role and advocate for fostering research and scholarship to advance nursing practice. An annotated bibliography stimulates innovative thinking to find solutions and approaches to effectively and efficiently address these issues.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.
Analyze current evidence on the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team.
Integrate current evidence about the impact of a selected patient care technology on patient safety, quality of care, and the interdisciplinary team into a recommendation.
Competency 4: Recommend using technology to enhance patient quality and safety standards.
Describe organizational factors influencing the selection of technology in the health care setting.
Justify the implementation and use of a selected technology in a healthcare setting.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
Create a clear, well-organized, and professional annotated bibliography, generally free from grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for all bibliographic entries.
To complete this assessment, perform the following preparatory activities:
Select a single direct or indirect patient care technology that is relevant to your current practice or interests you. Direct patient care technologies require an interaction, or direct contact, between the nurse and the patient.
Nurses use direct patient care technologies every day when delivering care to patients. Electronic thermometers or pulse oximeters are examples of direct patient care technologies.
Indirect patient care technologies, on the other hand, are those employed on behalf of the patient. They do not require interaction, or direct contact, between the nurse and patient. A handheld device for patient documentation is an example of an indirect patient care technology. Examples of topics to consider for your annotated bibliography include:
Workflow management systems.
Conduct a library search using the various electronic databases available through the Capella University Library.
Consult the BSN Program Library Research Guide to help identify scholarly and authoritative sources.
Access the NHS Learner Success Lab, linked in the courtroom navigation menu, for additional resources.
Scan the search results related to your chosen technology.
Select four peer-reviewed publications focused on your topic that are the most interesting to you.
Notes
Publications may be research studies or review articles from a professional source. Newspapers, magazines, and blogs are not considered professional sources.
Your selections need to be current—within the last five years.
Nursing informatics is a specialty that integrates nursing and analytical and information sciences to communicate and manage data in nursing practice. It involves the application of information technology in nursing education, research, and nursing services (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2021). Therefore, nurse informaticists are nurse practitioners who incorporate information technology in nursing services to improve the quality of healthcare services.
With the advancing technology in the world, there is a need for healthcare providers who are experts in information technology, such as nurse informaticists. According to American Informatics Association, the roles of nurse informaticists include creating protocols for data retrieval and data presentation to promote patient-centered care.
Secondly, nurse informaticists should do further studies on informatics to add new information and knowledge. Lastly, informaticists should actively promote health facility infrastructure by developing standards for communication and even advocating for evidence-based practice in the service provision (Wu et al., 2019).
Additionally, nurse informaticists should also be responsible for data validation using variety, volume, and velocity to promote a data-dependent decision-making process in the nursing practice (Garcia, 2021).
The informaticists should also be in charge of implementing the new technologies in the health facility by motivating and inspiring other healthcare providers to adopt the use of technology in clinical practice. From the above-described roles, it is apparent that the healthcare industry should promote nursing informatics expertise. This can be done by encouraging nurses to advance their studies in nursing informatics.
There are several health organizations and institutions with nurse informaticists. Nurse informatics specialists can identify measures promoting transformation since they can identify existing gaps in healthcare. An example of a healthcare organization with nurse informaticists is the John Peter Smith Hospital, located in Texas.
The facility assists in recognizing red flags for domestic violence and human trafficking by applying Mobile Health and Electronic Medical records to monitor patients’ progress (Azoui et al., 2021). This method has greatly improved the nurses’ workflow and has also provided nurse practitioners with guidelines and measures for problem-solving.
Another organization of note is the Texas Hospital. The hospital has nurse informaticists who leverage technology to validate and evaluate the clinicians’ work through Electronic Medical Records. For this reason, the hospital has experienced a reduced workload from handwritten documentation to electronic health records.
The nurses in the hospital have also positively influenced the predictive model through the integration of technology and analytical strategies in clinical practice. This technique has significantly improved identifying patients who require palliation and those at high risk of mortality, hence reducing mortality rates.
The nurse informaticists interact with the other nursing staff and the interdisciplinary team in several ways. For example, the nurse informaticists in Texas Hospital and John Peter Smith Hospital interact with staff from different disciplines by planning joint meeting sessions to equip them with technology concepts to improve healthcare outcomes.
The interdisciplinary team was enlightened on the use and advantages of adopting Electronic Medical records and Mobile Health (mHealth) (Azoui et al., 2021). Furthermore, the patients were also trained on using the tools to ease sharing and storage of data.
The engagement of nurses in the implementation of technology tools such as the electronic medical record and mobile health has contributed a lot to improving healthcare service provision and patient outcomes. According to (Azoui et al., 2021), using mHealth has assisted in patient motivation, engagement, and behavior change. For example, healthcare workers use mHealth to monitor patient health progress through Electronic Medical Records.
In addition, the tools also enable the healthcare workers to be among themselves and with the patients. Throughout their practice, the nurse informaticists must ensure that the patients’ data recorded is per HIPAA privacy policies because the mHealth and Electronic Medical Record store confidential information about the patients. Engagement of nurses in healthcare technology has also decreased the costs of workflow.
The roles of the nurse informaticists and their interaction with the interdisciplinary team have both opportunities and challenges. With nurse informaticists, health information has been easily accessible because the nurses participate in promoting healthcare technology adoption (Garcia, 2021)). For this reason, the workflow will be enhanced, making it easy to minimize errors while dealing with complex duties. With information technology, nurses and other medical practitioners can carry out services such as drug prescription, the booking of patients, and patient monitoring by using the mHealth and Electronic Medical Record tools.
On the other hand, the challenges facing nursing informatics include difficulty in adopting technology changes but the older nurses. The older nurses during their training were not exposed to technology, and they, therefore, do not know the importance of using technology in health service provision (Luo, 2019). The other challenge is the violation of the HIPAA privacy policies by the interdisciplinary team during the early phase of technology adoption. Additionally, the multidisciplinary team can also be influenced when an external party leaks information due to illegitimate applications.
This proposal has highlighted the importance of having nurse informaticists, especially for the organization that plans to adopt the healthcare technology tool to provide healthcare service. Both Texas and John Peter Smith Hospital have adopted two technology tools, the mHealth and Electronic Medical Records. Embracing technology in healthcare will enable smooth interaction between healthcare providers and patients by virtually linking up the facility services.
Based on this proposal, the following are the recommendations I would propose: First, I would advise the nurse managers and leaders to encourage the adoption and implementation of new technologies. Secondly, I would propose that the nurse administrators organize regular conferences and training to educate and train the nurses on the implementation of the latest technologies and their advantages.
I would advise the new nurses to be introduced to user-friendly technology tools to support their morale in technology adoption. Lastly, I would recommend that the nurse leader organize mentorship programs to help change the nurses’ perception of the new technologies.
Azoui, A., Abdelouhab, K. A., & Idoughi, D. (2021, November). Design and Implementation of Cloud-Based M-Health Application for an Electronic Medical Record System. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Renewable Energetic Systems (pp. 458-467). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92038-8_46
Garcia-Dia, M. J. (2021). Nursing informatics: An evolving specialty. Nursing Management, 52(5), 56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000743444.08164.b4
Luo, S. (2019). Special focus issue on nursing informatics: Challenges of utilizing electronic health records. International Journal Of Nursing Sciences, 6(1), 125. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ijnss.2018.11.001
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. 128422046X, 9781284220469.
Wu, D. T., Chen, A. T., Manning, J. D., Levy-Fix, G., Backonja, U., Borland, D., Caban, J. J., Dowding, D. W., Hochheiser, H., Kagan, V., Kandaswamy, S., Kumar, M., Nunez, A., Pan, E. & Gotz, D. (2019). Evaluating visual analytics for health informatics applications: a systematic review from the American Medical Informatics Association Visual Analytics Working Group Task Force on Evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(4), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy190
Prepare an 8-10 minute audio training tutorial (video is optional) for new nurses on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators.
As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the Conabedian Quality Assessment Framework activity. Quality health care delivery requires systematic action. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you consider how the triad of structure (such as the hospital, clinic, provider qualifications/organizational characteristics) and process (such as the delivery/coordination/education/protocols/practice style or standard of care) may be modified to achieve quality outcomes.
The American Nursing Association (ANA) established the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI®) in 1998 to track and report on quality indicators heavily influenced by nursing action.
NDNQI® was established as a standardized approach to evaluating nursing performance in relation to patient outcomes. It provides a database and quality measurement program to track clinical performance and to compare nursing quality measures against other hospital data at the national, regional, and state levels. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators help establish evidence-based practice guidelines in the inpatient and outpatient settings to enhance quality care outcomes and initiate quality improvement educational programs, outreach, and protocol development.
The quality indicators the NDNQI® monitors are organized into three categories: structure, process, and outcome. Theorist Avedis Donabedian first identified these categories. Donabedian’s theory of quality health care focused on the links between quality outcomes and the structures and processes of care (Grove et al., 2018).
Nurses must be knowledgeable about the indicators their workplaces monitor. Some nurses deliver direct patient care that leads to a monitored outcome. Other nurses may be involved in data collection and analysis. In addition, monitoring organizations, including managed care entities, exist to gather data from individual organizations to analyze overall industry quality. All of these roles are important to advance quality and safety outcomes.
The focus of Assessment 4 is on how informatics support monitoring of nursing-sensitive quality indicator data. You will develop an 8–10 minute audio (or video) training module to orient new nurses in a workplace to a single nursing-sensitive quality indicator critical to the organization. Your recording will address how data are collected and disseminated across the organization along with the nurses’ role in supporting accurate reporting and high quality results.
Reference
Grove, S. K., Gray, J. R., Jay, G. W., Jay, H. M., & Burns, N. (2018). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (7th ed.). Elsevier.
This assessment requires you to prepare an 8–10 minute audio training tutorial (with optional video) for new nurses on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. To successfully prepare for your assessment, you will need to complete the following preparatory activities:
To prepare to record the audio for your presentation, complete the following:
Notes:
For this assessment, imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council at any type of health care system, whether acute, ambulatory, home health, managed care, et cetera. Your Council has identified that newly hired nurses would benefit from comprehensive training on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators.
The Council would like the training to address how this information is collected and disseminated across the organization. It would also like the training to describe the role nurses have in accurate reporting and high-quality results.
The Council indicates a recording is preferable to a written fact sheet due to the popularity of audio blogs. In this way, new hires can listen to the tutorial on their own time using their phone or other device.
As a result of this need, you offer to create an audio tutorial orienting new hires to these topics. You know that you will need a script to guide your audio recording. You also plan to incorporate into your script the insights you learned from conducting an interview with an authority on quality monitoring and the use of technology to collect and report quality indicator data.
You determine that you will cover the following topics in your audio tutorial script:
Introduction: Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicator
Collection and Distribution of Quality Indicator Data
After completing your script, practice delivering your tutorial several times before recording it.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Taking the role of care coordination as an RN in the community care center, it is essential to acknowledge age-related and elder care health issues. Aging encompasses numerous physical, psychosocial, and cultural issues, which together make it very demanding and, therefore, require a multi-faceted approach to achieve optimum health for our elderly citizens. This initial plan for care coordination has HF as the focus when it comes to elderly patients in a community care context.
The staff shortage in the dedicated care management area prompts the development of a different approach, where the functions of the nurses predominate in care coordination. The plan below encompasses physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for elderly patients with HF, as well as community resources that can provide a safe and effective continuum of care.
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that results from the weakening of the heart’s pumping function; thus, the blood flow becomes insufficient throughout the body. It becomes more common with age, making it a significant problem in older adults (Hajouli & Ludhwani, 2022). The established guidelines for managing HF connotes drug adherence, lifestyle changes, and patient education.
Examples of drug treatment include diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and beta-blockers (Hajouli & Ludhwani, 2022). Lifestyle modifications aim at advancing a healthy diet, weight management, regular physical activity, and quitting smoking. Education for patients is one of the main pillars that enable HF patients to competently manage their conditions, among them identification of the symptoms associated with deterioration of heart failure (Allida et al., 2020).
While the introduction of these best practices for elderly patients into a community setting has some distinctive challenges, they provide significant advantages. The elderly frequently experience polypharmacy, where multiple drugs are used, thereby complicating the task of medication adherence (Unlu et al., 2020). Moreover, age-related cognitive decline, a frequently occurring occurrence in older persons, can interfere with the mastery of educational materials and the application of self-management approaches (Yang et al., 2022).
The following specific goals are intended to address the issues experienced by older individuals with HF in a community care setting:
Physical limitations, such as fatigue, shortness of breath, and low exercise tolerance, are highly prevalent among elderly patients with heart failure. Such restrictions may prohibit everyday activities, and they could make falling more likely or increase crash skills. The care coordination plan addresses these needs through:
Social isolation and depression are recurring problems for the elderly suffering from HF (Goodlin & Gottlieb, 2023). Psychosocial factors that are concerned with the well-being of both body and mind often have a negative impact on self-care and health results. The plan addresses these needs by:
Cultural beliefs and values affecting health and illness can determine the decision to seek medical help, as well as the exact level of medication compliance in elderly patients (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). The plan addresses these needs through:
The establishment of a resilient network of community resources is critical in guaranteeing a seamless and efficient progression of care for elderly individuals afflicted with heart failure (HF). Through the utilization of these resources, it is possible to improve the overall well-being and quality of life of the geriatric demographic. The following community resources are essential for geriatric HF patients and are tailored to their specific needs:
Through availing the community resources, the community will be able to build an environment boosting individuals’ mental and physical well-being for those with senior heart failure, and this will allow them to manage the ailment competently, which will have an impact on their overall wellness and flourishing in our local community.
A comprehensive strategy that incorporates the physical, social, and cultural aspects of a patient is required to improve care for the elderly with heart failure. By strategically establishing objectives and leveraging community resources, it is possible to create a series of services that guarantee a secure and empathetic progression of healthcare for the most susceptible members of our community. By means of collaborative efforts and the pursuit of culturally sensitive treatment provision, it is possible to achieve the intended result of optimizing the well-being and healthcare services of geriatric patients diagnosed with heart failure.
Allida, S., Du, H., Xu, X., Prichard, R., Chang, S., Hickman, L. D., Davidson, P. M., & Inglis, S. C. (2020). MHealth education interventions in heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011845.pub2
Goodlin, S. J., & Gottlieb, S. H. (2023). Social isolation and loneliness in Heart Failure. JACC: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.002
Hajouli, S., & Ludhwani, D. (2022, December 23). Heart failure and ejection fraction. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553115/
Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(158), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2
Unlu, O., Levitan, E. B., Reshetnyak, E., Kneifati-Hayek, J., Diaz, I., Archambault, A., Chen, L., Hanlon, J. T., Maurer, M. S., Safford, M. M., Lachs, M. S., & Goyal, P. (2020). Polypharmacy in older adults hospitalized for heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.120.006977
Yang, M., Sun, D., Wang, Y., Yan, M., Zheng, J., & Ren, J. (2022). Cognitive impairment in heart failure: Landscape, challenges, and future directions. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.831734
Also Read:
NHS-FPX-4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan
Develop a 3-4 page preliminary care coordination plan for a selected health care problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care problem. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
The first step in any effective project is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate the coordination of care for a particular health care problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care problem. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment before Assessment 4.
As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Care Coordination Planning activity. Completion of this will provide useful practice, particularly for those of you who do not have care coordination experience in community settings. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate engagement.
Imagine that you are a staff nurse in a community care center. Your facility has always had a dedicated case management staff that coordinated the patient plan of care, but recently, there were budget cuts and the case management staff has been relocated to the inpatient setting. Care coordination is essential to the success of effectively managing patients in the community setting, so you have been asked by your nurse manager to take on the role of care coordination. You are a bit unsure of the process, but you know you will do a good job because, as a nurse, you are familiar with difficult tasks. As you take on this expanded role, you will need to plan effectively in addressing the specific health concerns of community residents.
To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Allow plenty of time to plan your chosen health care concern.
Note: You are required to complete this assessment before Assessment 4.
Develop the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan
Complete the following:
Select one of the health concerns in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Preliminary Care Coordination Plan [PDF]resource as the focus of your care coordination plan. In your plan, please include physical, psychosocial, and cultural needs.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Document Format and Length
Your preliminary plan should be an APA scholarly paper, 3–4 pages in length.
Remember to use active voice, this means being direct and writing concisely; as opposed to passive voice, which means writing with a tendency to wordiness.
In your paper include possible community resources that can be used.
Be sure to review the scoring guide to make sure all criteria are addressed in your paper.
Study the subtle differences between basic, proficient, and distinguished.
Cite at least two credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications that support your preliminary plan.
The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Preliminary Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Analyze your selected health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Cite supporting evidence for best practices.
Consider underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in your analysis.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address the health care problem.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Write with a specific purpose with your patient in mind.
Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and current APA formatting requirements.
Before submitting your assessment, proofread your preliminary care coordination plan and community resources list to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan. Be sure to submit both documents
Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.
Analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.
Describe specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Criterion 1
Analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Distinguished
Provides a perceptive analysis of a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement. Provides credible evidence for best practices and articulates underlying assumptions and points of uncertainty in the analysis.
Proficient
Analyzes a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Basic
Attempts to analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Non Performance
Does not analyze a health concern and the associated best practices for health improvement.
Criterion 2
Describe specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Distinguished
Describes specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem. Ensures that the goals are realistic, measurable, and attainable.
Proficient
Describes specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Basic
Attempts to describe undefined goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Non Performance
Does not describe specific goals that should be established to address a selected health care problem.
Criterion 3
Identify available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Distinguished
Identifies significant and available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care. Provides a comprehensive list of resources, with credible evidence of their contribution toward improving community health.
Proficient
Identifies available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care.
Basic
Attempts to identify available community resources.
Non Performance
Does not identify available community resources.
Criterion 4
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Distinguished
Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.
Proficient
Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Basic
Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Non Performance
Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.
Criterion 5
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Distinguished
Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.
Proficient
Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Basic
Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing.
Non Performance
Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.
Nurses are vital to care coordinators. Patient care is holistic and requires the collaboration of various healthcare providers, nurses, patients, and their families. One of the prerequisites for accurate coordination is extensive knowledge of care coordination. The care providers then relay the information to other stakeholders and outline their care coordination roles. The care provider’s ability to manage the problems effectively determines the success of their community interactions and health. This essay analyzes care coordination concepts in pain management.
Pain management is an area that has many problems and ethical issues surrounding it. Pain accompanies most healthcare conditions, and the intensity, severity, and duration differ based on personal characteristics and the pain etiology. Pain management faces many issues due to tolerance and opioid addiction, affecting all health domains.
McCabe (2018) notes that physical pain can be disabling and limit daily activities, cause psychosocial pain, and affect the social interaction of individuals. Pain aggravates the management of conditions such as cancer when patients take many medications with various side effects, such as nausea and vomiting. Yet, they do not feel their therapeutic effectiveness because the pain does not cease. Thus, pain management needs to be addressed owing to the many issues associated with the problem.
Various institutions have come together to manage the issue of pain. The WHO developed the pain management ladder to assess the pain level, which outlines the management interventions for the specific pain level (McGuire & Slavin, 2020). WHO developed the ladder to manage cancer pain, but it can be used to manage all other health conditions.
Patient pain assessment tools for all populations have been developed over time. They help healthcare providers assess pain from patient reports and even from their facial expressions (Gregory, 2019). The tools have helped ensure quality care delivery. The primary assumption in pain management is that it refers to physical pain because the pain in other domains may present as other symptoms, such as fear and depression.
The prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) is a national program that was developed to manage prescription drugs. The technology helps care providers to trace prescription drugs, especially opioids and benzodiazepines (Manders & Abd-Elsayed, 2020). The care providers also use the technology to determine the include and rates of opioid addiction and enroll them in management programs. Scholars argue that the technology has helped predict and prevent opioid use addiction in patients with prolonged opioid analgesics use.
Another integral evidence-based strategy is the management algorithm supported by clinical decision support systems. Care providers assess patients to determine their needs and then manage them depending on the algorithm’s instructions. Pangarkar et al. (2020) note that various clinical pain management algorithms have been developed to help manage pain in cancer, ballistic injuries (in veterans), and other chronic diseases such as acute renal injury. Patient assessment (using current tools) is integral to their management hence the need for patient clinic visits and assessment.
There are various goals when addressing the healthcare problem. The first goal is to ensure pain control and relief while taking the lowest possible medication doses. Meaningful pain control increases functional abilities and the quality of life. Adequate pain control requires care collaboration between patients and their primary care providers.
Moreover, the goal is based upon continuous assessment and therapy change for effective pain management. The second goal is medication and other interventions adherence. Poor medication adherence is associated with many factors, such as perceived effectiveness, negligence, forgetfulness, and medication side effects (Swarm et al., 2019).
The third goal is utilizing pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management interventions for effective pain management. Pain management should entail corresponding and effective pain management interventions. Some duos have been found more effective than single therapies using medications or non-pharmacologic pain interventions. For example, massage can be used in musculoskeletal pain in addition to pharmacologic interventions. The two methods used together produce superior effects. Other interventions include acupuncture and yoga for back pain.
The fourth goal is the holistic care of patients. Pain management, especially chronic and severe pain, requires opioid analgesic interventions. This goal aims to ensure that pain management interventions do not affect other aspects of patient health (Cohen et al., 2020). These include addiction and dependence, and undesirable side effects. The goals will also entail social support for patients to promote their psychological welfare. Holistic care affects the effectiveness of other interventions, such as medication adherence. These goals are vital in pain management and will help ensure all interventions and efforts are in tandem with population needs.
Various society groups focus on patients and support them in patient management. Groups such as cancer (Cancer Care) and veteran affairs support groups (Veterans In Pain) help patients recover from the pain and painful experiences. The groups offer social support to individuals with pain and underlying medical condition. These institutions enhance care continuity at home. Most of these organizations are accessible online, and they provide online resources that help in decision-making.
Other non-profit organizations have been developed in communities to aid in pain management. Organizations such as US Pain Foundation and The Pain Community help individuals with pain conditions access medical care and effective prescriptions (Savoy, 2022). They also support them financially and emotionally to increase their utilization of pain management interventions and thus improve their quality of life. Other organizations, such as the Pelvic Pain Society, offer care specific to their target population. These organizations provide evidence-based strategies and pain management interventions to their target populations.
They provide online resources where they teach patient interventions such as addiction assessment and best prescription practices. They also offer room for social support when individuals interact and share their experiences. Community centers and parks are essential community resources, often underrated for their effectiveness in pain management and mental health stability (Savoy, 2022). Community centers increase access to other individuals, especially the elderly population, and helps these patients meet social needs.
Pain management is surrounded by many ethical and legal issues surrounding medications and other interventions. Nurses play a significant role in care coordination and ensuring patients receive the care they need. Care coordination also ensures care continuity in the community. Community resources such as pain management organizations and support groups are integral in meeting patients’ cultural and social needs, hence managing the holistic patient. Care coordination is a vital nurse’s role, and succeeding in the role enhances the success of care interventions.
Cohen, S. P., Baber, Z. B., Buvanendran, A., McLean, B. C., Chen, Y., Hooten, W. M., Laker, S. R., Wasan, A. D., Kennedy, D. J., Sandbrink, F., King, S. A., Fowler, I. M., Stojanovic, M. P., Hayek, S. M., & Phillips, C. R. (2020). Pain management best practices from multispecialty organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic and public health crises. Pain Medicine, 21(7), 1331-1346.7. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa127
Gregory, J. (2019). Use of pain scales and observational pain assessment tools in hospital settings. Nursing Standard, 34(9), 70-4. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2019.e11308
Manders, L., & Abd-Elsayed, A. (2020). Mandatory review of prescription drug monitoring programs before issuance of a controlled substance results in overall reduction of prescriptions including opioids and benzodiazepines. Pain Physician, 23(3), 299. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32517396/
McCabe, M. J. (2018). Ethical issues in pain management. Ethics in Hospice Care: Challenges to Hospice Values in a Changing Health Care Environment, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315809823-4/
McGuire, L. S., & Slavin, K. (2020). Revisiting the WHO analgesic ladder for surgical management of pain. AMA Journal of Ethics, 22(8), 695-701. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.695
Pangarkar, S. S., Kang, D. G., Sandbrink, F., Bevevino, A., Tillisch, K., Konitzer, L., & Sall, J. (2019). VA/DoD clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(11), 2620-2629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05086-4
Savoy, M. L. (2022). Systems-Based Practice in Chronic Pain Management. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 49(3), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2022.01.004
Swarm, R. A., Paice, J. A., Anghelescu, D. L., Are, M., Bruce, J. Y., Buga, S., & Gurski, L. A. (2019). Adult cancer pain, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of t
Nurses are vital professionals in assessing and managing problems affecting populations. Health promotion entails empowering individuals with resources and information to assist them in making decisions regarding their lives. Bullying is the intentional act of harming, intimidating, or coercing someone perceived as vulnerable.
Bullying can occur at school, in the workplace, in the community, and online (cyberbullying). Statistics show that most bullies do not change, and the behavior persists in college and work. Individuals who are socially or economically disadvantaged are often at risk for bullying due to the actual or perceived imbalance of power. This health promotion plan aims to increase bullying awareness and its management among high school students.
The target population is boys and girls aged 14-18 from Delattre High School. The population comprises teenage high school students from all ethnic groups and gender. Bullying at this age is commonplace and leads to significant physical and psychological health issues (Yoon et al., 2020). These students are at puberty and still developing, and their parents supply most of their needs. Discussing the issues of bullying with this group is an issue of interest. Some may have secured small jobs in cafes to supplement their home income or earn money for personal use.
The chosen hypothetical group represents the population in high school in American High schools. The students from these high schools are between the ages of fourteen and eighteen and are either victims or perpetrators of bullying hence the significance to the target population. In this particular school, there are numerous reports of bullying based on skin color, size, and socio-economical background. Unfortunately, bullying does not end in the school and often persists in communities and online hence the need to ensure adequate protection for this population.
High-school students report being significantly bullied by others. This group represents the significant age where most bullying begins and is much more severe. Statistics show that about 70% of high schools have been bullied at some point in their education (Seldin & Yanez, 2019). The bullies are often individuals with physical or social power above them, meaning they can beat or mobilize others to beat them, or they come from a socio-economically stable home
The teens are predisposed to the problem due to the balance of power. They are weak and vulnerable, and their oppressors can mobilize other resources to help overcome the bullying. Most of the bullied students report being bullied by physically stronger students and those of higher socio-economic status.
Being of a different race also puts them at risk, seeing that there are higher reports of bullying in African Americans and other races than whites (Silver et al., 2022). Other factors include a lack of organizational policies that prevent youths from being bullied. Gaffney et al. (2019) state that bullying prevention methods such as detention and school counseling are routinely used and are generally ineffective because the bullying behavior continues. Some communities, especially low-income neighborhoods, expose individuals to bullying.
A health promotion plan will help increase their awareness of bullying to help recognize bullying and initiate its prevention. Some kids are bullied and do not understand they are bullied. The health promotion plan will also help them develop strategies to avoid bullying at school, at home, and community. It will also help them access resources and utilize structures set by the state and local governments to mitigate bullying, such as homeless shelters and safe places. The information will also help the offenders access help because bullying is a habit that can be dropped.
When developing a sociogram for these hypothetical groups, the content to include is social and physical power and other social determinants of health. These include race, socio-economic background, personality, and social relationships. Some genetic conditions limit individual strength and physic, exposing them to bullying, while some give them a physical advantage over others (Johansson et al., 2020).
Individuals from high-income families often enjoy privileges such as parental protection and can thus turn to bullying those from low-income families with nobody to protect them. Some personalities, such as the humble students and students brought up in families where expression is limited, often suffer bullying and fail to report it.
The are various learning needs for this population. Some of the needs addressed in this health promotion plan will be understanding the concept of bullying, various forms of bullying, strategies to prevent bullying, and resources available to help prevent bullying. Understanding these concepts will help them participate in learning and bullying prevention efforts. The smart goals are:
The current statistics show that youths who bully are also victims of bullying and have low self-esteem and thus bully to satisfy their ego. In addition, those who are bullied keep quiet, which only cultivates the behavior because of inaction targeting bullies (Herkama et al., 2022). The desire is to end bullying by increasing access to knowledge on bullying and its undesirable effects. The expectation can be met through a presentation on bullying and group discussions to help brainstorm ideas and create social bonds necessary to manage bullying. Fliers are good strategies to ensure the learners spread the information to their friends and also use it to prevent themselves from being bullied.
Bullying is undesirable due to its many effects on the population, including psychological and physical trauma. Teens are prone to bullying due to unfavorable school policies that fail to protect them. Other factors include physical and socio-economical power imbalance between the victim and the bully. The health promotion plan will target high school students to equip them with skills and knowledge to help avoid bullying as either victims or bullies. Bullying is a habit that can be dropped hence the significance of the health promotion plan.
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.09.005
Herkama, S., Kontio, M., Sainio, M., Turunen, T., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2022). Facilitators and barriers to the sustainability of a school-based bullying prevention program. Prevention Science, 23(6), 954-968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01368-2
Johansson, A., Huhtamäki, A., Sainio, M., Kaljonen, A., Boivin, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2022). Heritability of bullying and victimization in children and adolescents: Moderation by the KiVa antibullying program. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 51(4), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1731820
Seldin, M., & Yanez, C. (2019). Student Reports of Bullying: Results from the 2017 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. Web Tables. NCES 2019-054. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019054.pdf
Silva, G. R. R., Lima, M. L. C. D., Acioli, R. M. L., & Barreira, A. K. (2020). Prevalence and factors associated with bullying: differences between the roles of bullies and victims of bullying. Jornal de Pediatria, 96, 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.09.005
Yoon, D., Shipe, S. L., Park, J., & Yoon, M. (2021). Bullying patterns and their associations with child maltreatment and adolescent psychosocial problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 129, 106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106178
Historically, nurses have made significant contributions to community and public health with regard to health promotion, disease prevention, and environmental and public safety. They have also been instrumental in shaping public health policy. Today, community and public health nurses have a key role in identifying and developing plans of care to address local, national, and international health issues. The goal of community and public health nursing is to optimize the health of individuals and families, taking into consideration cultural, racial, ethnic groups, communities, and populations.
Caring for a population involves identifying the factors that place the population’s health at risk and developing specific interventions to address those factors. The community/public health nurse uses epidemiology as a tool to customize disease prevention and health promotion strategies disseminated to a specific population. Epidemiology is the branch of medicine that investigates causes of various diseases in a specific population (CDC, 2012; Healthy People 2030, n.d.).
As an advocate and educator, the community/public health nurse is instrumental in providing individuals, groups, and aggregates with the tools that are essential for health promotion and disease prevention. There is a connection between one’s quality of life and their health literacy. Health literacy is related to the knowledge, comprehension, and understanding of one’s condition along with the ability to find resources that will treat, prevent, maintain, or cure their condition.
Health literacy is impacted by the individual’s learning style, reading level, and the ability understand and retain the information being provided. The individual’s technology aptitude and proficiency in navigating available resources is an essential component to making informed decisions and to the teaching learning process (CDC, 2012; Healthy People 2030, n.d.).
It is essential to develop trust and rapport with community members to accurately identify health needs and help them adopt health promotion, health maintenance, and disease prevention strategies. Cultural, socio-economical, and educational biases need to be taken into consideration when communicating and developing an individualized treatment and educational plan. Social, economic, cultural, and lifestyle behaviors can have an impact on an individual’s health and the health of a community.
These behaviors may pose health risks, which may be mitigated through lifestyle/behaviorally-based education. The environment, housing conditions, employment factors, diet, cultural beliefs, and family/support system structure play a role in a person’s levels of risk and resulting health. Assessment, evaluation, and inclusion of these factors provide a basis for the development of an individualized plan. The health professional may use a genogram or sociogram in this process.
What is a genogram? A genogram, similar to a family tree, is used to gather detailed information about the quality of relationships and interactions between family members over generations as opposed to lineage. Gender, family relationships, emotional relationships, lifespan, and genetic predisposition to certain health conditions are components of a genogram. A genogram, for instance, may identify a pattern of martial issues perhaps rooted in anger or explain why a person has green eyes.
What is a sociogram? A sociogram helps the health professional to develop a greater understanding of these factors by seeing inter-relationships, social links between people or other entities, as well as patterns to identify vulnerable populations and the flow of information within the community.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Lesson 1: Introduction to epidemiology. In Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice (3rd ed.). https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/section1.html
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Healthy People 2030. https://health.gov/healthypeople
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Creating an ePortfolio is not required in the BSN program, but you may find it helpful to create one to attach to your professional resume while job hunting. Online ePortfolios serve two key purposes: 1) to support learning and reflection, and 2) to be used as a showcase tool. Your learning journey can be documented, and ePortfolios contribute to lifelong learning and growth through reflection and sharing. Online ePortfolios can also be shared with employers and peers to present artifacts that demonstrate your accomplishments at Capella.
As you are preparing to tell your story in the professional world, leverage your ePortfolio artifacts to demonstrate the knowledge and competencies you have gained through your program in professional conversations, performance reviews, and interviews. To do that, reflect on the knowledge and skills you have gained from your courses and the elements you have put in your portfolio, along with how you have already applied these things to your professional life or how you might apply them in the future. Next, create your story or talking points to tell your professional story.
Capella complies with privacy laws designed to protect the privacy of personal information. While you may voluntarily share your own information publicly, you are obligated to protect the personal information of others that may be associated with your academic or professional development. Before sharing information and material in any ePortfolio that is set up to be shared externally to your program at Capella, please consider privacy obligations in relation to protected populations who may be included or referenced in your academic or clinical work. Refer to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) if you have specific questions or concerns about your choices.
Note: Assessment 1 must be completed first before you are able to submit Assessment 4.
The first step in any effective project or clinical patient encounter is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to plan a hypothetical clinical learning experience focused on health promotion associated with a specific community health concern. Such a plan defines the critical elements of who, what, when, where, and why that establish the foundation for an effective clinical learning experience for the participants. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate individual or group participation. This assessment is the foundation for the implementation of your health promotion educational plan (Assessment 4).
You will need to satisfactorily pass Assessment 1 (Health Promotion Plan) before working on your last assessment (Assessment 4).
To prepare for the assessment, consider various health concerns that you would like to be the focus of your plan from the topic list provided, the populations potentially affected by that concern, and hypothetical individuals or groups living in the community. Then, investigate your chosen concern and best practices for health improvement, based on supporting evidence.
As you begin to prepare this assessment, you are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Effective Interpersonal Communications activity. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment. Completing activities is also a way to demonstrate engagement.
For this assessment, you will propose a hypothetical health promotion plan addressing a particular health concern affecting a fictitious individual or group living in the community. The hypothetical individual or group of your choice must be living in the community; not in a hospital, assistant living, nursing home, or other facility. You may choose any health issues from the list provided in the instructions.
In the Assessment 4, you will simulate a face-to-face presentation of this plan to the individual or group that you have identified.
Please choose one of the topics below:
In addition, you are encouraged to:
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft assessment to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24-48 hours for receiving feedback.
Health Promotion Plan
Your health promotion plan should be 3-4 pages in length.
Supporting Evidence
Support your health promotion plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources published within the past five years, using APA format.
Graded Requirements
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Before submitting your assessment for grading, proofread it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.
Wei et al. (2021) indicate that collaboration among healthcare providers has increased patient outcomes such as adverse drug reactions, decreased mortality and morbidity, and improved medication dosage. One of the main issues impacting healthcare provision among patients is poor communication. Poor communication among nurses and physicians increased patient dissatisfaction and adverse patient outcomes.
Studies indicate that hypertension puts patients at a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The mortality rate for hypertension remains high, and the condition remains undertreated, under detected, and uncontrolled. Team-based care is coordinated care which involves various healthcare providers working together collaboratively to help patients manage Hypertension (Linthicum et al., 2021). Team-based care has received attention since it allows patients to access high-quality care from various healthcare providers.
Hospitals that lack proper communication and collaboration among the healthcare provider also experience higher rates of readmission and increased hospital stays among patients. This paper will assess a patient with hypertension from a leadership, communication, collaboration, change management, and policy perspective.
In this assessment, we will consider the case of Tina Jones, a 38-year-old African American with no history of substance abuse but admits to turning to food as a way of coping with stress and anxiety. She states that she lives in the ‘hood’ and is constantly worrying about the safety of her husband and her son. She is also 30lbs past her recommended BMI. She has issues sticking to a healthy diet because she frequently visits her parents (3-4 times a week) and her father enjoys spoiling her with barbecues and other fried foods.
She does not find eating vegetables appealing and generally avoids them. Her mother has a history of diabetes and high blood pressure, while her father was recently diagnosed with hyperlipidemia. Her father, unlike her, maintains a highly active lifestyle and exercises four days a week. The combination of the poor lifestyle choices and the high blood pressure issue increase Mrs. Jones’ adverse outcomes.
This issue is a significant problem for the patient because it increases her risk of developing cardiovascular conditions. Her poor lifestyle choices also increase her chances of developing diabetes, among other lifestyle-related diseases. Carey et al. (2018) indicate that African Americans are twice more likely to develop hypertension than other populations.
Blacks have a higher incidence of hypertension-related cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal failure than other populations in the United States. The CDC suggests that a heightened response is necessary due to the disparities in high blood pressure control in African American individuals (Wei et al., 2021). Poor management of hypertension causes patients to develop treatment-resistant hypertension.
Carthon et al. (2019) indicate that African Americans are more sensitive to salt than other patient populations. They also respond differently to high blood pressure medication than other patient groups. As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, this information is essential because it indicates that while hypertension is mainly a lifestyle-related condition, certain populations are more prone to developing the problem than others (Linthicum et al., 2021).
Therefore, it is vital to constantly advise and educate African American patients about their risk of developing the condition and salt sensitivity. It also demonstrates that specific treatment should be considered for this patient population.
Research agrees with observations made when treating patients with hypertension. A person’s lifestyle, pharmaceutical regimen, underlying health issues, genetic background, or a combination of these elements can cause hypertension. Age, race, a family medical history of hypertension or premature cardiovascular disease, and other concomitant health issues are all nonmodifiable health issues (Carthon et al., 2019).
Therefore changing a patient’s lifestyle through healthy eating and exercise will achieve a healthy weight and reverse their hypertension diagnosis. Integrated therapy also involves various psychotherapy treatments, including changing the patient’s lifestyle (Wei et al., 2021). The success of a treatment course is measured by the patient’s acceptance and adherence to the treatment regimen. The reliability of research data is measured by comparing various versions of the same measurement. Its validity is found by comparing other relevant data and theories.
Amoah et al. (2020) suggests that despite efforts to combat hypertension through pharmacotherapy, the control of the condition remains low. Lifestyle modifications of patients with hypertension allow them to enjoy better health outcomes. The study assessed the impact of modifiable lifestyle factors on blood pressure among patients in Ghana.
The study used 360 individuals diagnosed with hypertension. The study used a diet and exercise assessment, and the blood pressure was measured frequently. The study concluded that increased physical activity, increased fruit intake, and reduced meat, carbohydrates, and fat positively impacted blood pressure control among patients. The lifestyle modified factors play a significant role in complementing pharmacotherapy in blood pressure control.
Nurses play a significant role in improving patient outcomes. Since they are at the forefront of patient care, nurses are responsible for educating patients on the importance of eating healthily and maintaining an active lifestyle (Linthicum et al., 2021). Nurses also have the role of continuing their education and finding ways of implementing evidence-based research into their treatment plans. Orem’s self-care framework was most suitable for this issue (Wei et al., 2021).
The theory suggests that individuals should deliberately and freely initiate and perform on their behalf in maintaining life, health, and well-being. Nurses’ actions should be directed toward assisting the patient in assuming responsibility for self-care (Nasresabetghadam et al., 2021). Therefore, with proper education on the best lifestyle changes, Mrs. Jones can enjoy a healthy life and significantly reduce her blood pressure and weight.
According to the Nursing Practice Act (NPA), nurses must provide safe, appropriate, and responsive quality nursing practice and develop a plan for nursing practice. To achieve these objectives, nurses have to implement and recognize the nursing practices and act to improve the treatment and comply with practice requirements (Carthon et al., 2019).
Nurses should advocate for better care for the patients ensure they have the information to with the information they need. Nurses should educate patients on the impact of salty and fried foods on their health. They should also advocate for the creation of public policies which prevent and ensure appropriate treatment for hypertension.
The organizational culture significantly impacts patient care (Wei et al., 2021). A healthier organizational culture will ensure positive patient outcomes such as reduced mortality and length of stay. It will also improve the patients’ quality of life and decrease pain levels. The organization culture should support nurses’ efforts of educating patients and providing evidence-based treatment.
Organizational success and leadership have a direct cause-and-effect relationship. Ideology, culture, change adaptability, and employee empowerment are all determined by leaders (Wei et al., 2021). They influence institutional strategies, as well as their implementation and efficacy. Leaders in healthcare institutions have a critical impact on the care provided to patients. They encourage personnel to increase their knowledge, skills, and talents to enhance health care quality, safety, empathy, and patient outcomes (Akbiyik et al., 2020).
They continually encourage, motivate, and reward innovation and introduce new and better working methods. Nasresabetghadam et al. (2021) indicate that when nurses have proper leadership, medical facilities exhibit improvements in patient satisfaction, patient safety outcomes, and fewer medical complications. Nurse leaders are increasingly being asked to provide patients with better healthcare encounters. Effective leadership, communication, and collaboration can increase, leading to better patient outcomes.
Hypertension is a condition that can greatly impact a patient’s outcomes and quality of life. However, since it is a lifestyle-related health problem, it can be managed and reversed when the patients engage in regular exercises and have a better diet. Nurses play a critical role in patient care and educate patients on the best practices to ensure better patient outcomes. Effective organizational leadership can improve patient outcomes, and nurses are encouraged to practice evidence-based patient-centered care. Nurses should also be actively involved in the development of policies and legislation that can help the country and communities reduce the number of patients suffering from hypertension and other lifestyle-related illnesses.
Akbiyik, A., Korhan, E. A., Kiray, S., & Kirsan, M. (2020). The effect of nurses’ leadership behavior on the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes. Creative nursing, 26(1), e8-e18. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.26.1.e8
Carey, R. M., Muntner, P., Bosworth, H. B., & Whelton, P. K. (2018). Prevention and control of Hypertension: JACC health promotion series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(11), 1278-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.008
Carthon, J. M., Hatfield, L., Plover, C., Dierkes, A., Davis, L., Hedgeland, T., Sanders, A. M., Visco, F., Holland, S., Ballinghoff, J., Del Guidice, M., & Aiken, L. H. (2019). Association of Nurse Engagement and Nurse Staffing on Patient Safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000334
Linthicum, M. T., dosReis, S., Slejko, J. F., Mattingly, T. J., & Bright, J. L. (2021). The importance of collaboration in pursuit of patient-centered value assessment. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14(4), 381-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00446-3
Amoah, M. E., Okai, E. D., Manu, A., Laar, A., Akamah, J., & Torpey, K. (2020). The role of lifestyle factors in controlling blood pressure among hypertensive patients in two health facilities in Urban Ghana: a cross-sectional Study. International Journal of Hypertension, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9379128
Nasresabetghadam, S., Jahanshahi, M., Fotokian, Z., Nasiri, M., & Hajiahmadi, M. (2021). The effects of Orem’s self-care theory on self-care behaviors among older women with Hypertension: A randomized controlled trial. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 10(2), 99-108. https://journals.lww.com/nams/toc/2021/10020
Wei, H., Corbett, R. W., Ray, J., & Wei, T. L. (2020). A culture of caring: the essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476
Nurses in all professional roles work to effect positive patient outcomes and improve organizational processes. Professional nurses are leaders in problem identification, planning, and strategy implementation—skills that directly affect patient care or organizational effectiveness.
Too often, change agents jump to a conclusion that an intervention will promote the envisioned improvement. Instead, the ideal approach is to determine which interventions are appropriate, based on an assessment and review of credible evidence. Interventions could be patient-facing or involve a change in policy and process. In this assessment, you’ll identify and make the case for your practicum focus area, then explore it in depth from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective.
This assessment lays the foundation for the work that will carry you through your capstone experience and guide the practicum hours needed to complete the work in this course. In addition, it will enable you to do the following:
Also Read:
NURS-FPX4900 Assessment 2 Assessing the Problem: Quality, Safety, and Cost Considerations
NURS-FPX4900 Assessment 3 Assessing the Problem: Technology, Care Coordination, and Community Resources Considerations
NURS-FPX4900 Assessment 4 Patient, Family, or Population Health Problem Solution
In this assessment, you’ll assess the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Plan to spend approximately 2 hours working with a patient, family, or group of your choice to explore the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective. During this time, you may also choose to consult with subject matter and industry experts about the problem (for example, directors of quality or patient safety, nurse managers/directors, physicians, and epidemiologists).
To prepare for the assessment, complete the following:
In addition, you may wish to complete the following:
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.
Complete this assessment in two parts.
Define the patient, family, or population health problem that will be the focus of your capstone project. Assess the problem from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, and policy perspective and establish your evidence and research base to plan, implement, and share findings related to your project.
Connect with the patient, family, or group you’ll work with during your practicum. During this portion of your practicum, plan to spend at least 2 hours meeting with the patient, family, or group and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts of your choice. The hours you spend meeting with them should take place outside of regular work hours. Use the Practicum Focus Sheet [PDF] provided for this assessment to guide your work and interpersonal interactions. Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Capella Academic Portal Volunteer Experience Form.
Complete the NURS-FPX4900 Volunteer Experience Form in Capella Academic Portal. Include a description of your relationship to the patient, family, or group in the Volunteer Experience comments field.
The BSN Capstone Course (NURS-FPX4900 ) requires the completion and documentation of nine (9) practicum hours. All hours must be recorded in the Capella Academic Portal. Please review the BSN Practicum Campus page for more information and instructions on how to log your hours.
The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Nurses, who make up the majority of the healthcare workforce, are vital to patient care. Nurses in all professional roles strive to improve organizational processes and achieve positive patient outcomes. In particular, nurses identify problems, plan interventions/strategies, and implement the strategies-skills, all of which directly impact patient outcomes and organizational effectiveness (Wakefield et al., 2021). Patient care is constantly evolving, and this evolution is due to the initial identification of a problem and the pursuit of solutions.
However, before embarking on a specific change management strategy, the best approach is to assess and review credible evidence to determine appropriate interventions. As a result, nurses must be actively involved in the entire change process, beginning with the prodromal phase of justifying the appropriateness of interventions to be implemented (Wakefield et al., 2021). Using hypertension as an example, the goal of the following discussion is to elaborate on the problem extensively, drawing on evidence from relevant databases, and to discuss the effectiveness of nursing standards/or policies in improving the patient problem, as well as the leadership strategies relevant to the problem identified.
Chronic illness management places a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system as a whole. A significant proportion of the global population is affected by hypertension, chronic disease, and the leading preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hypertension is defined as high blood pressure, with a systolic blood pressure of ?140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of ?90 mm Hg (AHA, 2022). Also, Mills et al. (2020) define hypertension as the current use of antihypertensive medications for research purposes. In 2010, the condition affected 1.38 billion people, or 31.1% of the global population, with men having a slightly higher prevalence of 31.9% than females, who had a prevalence of 30.1% (Mills et al., 2020).
Modifiable risk factors for hypertension include obesity, alcohol, smoking, diet, and physical inactivity. In contrast, the non-modifiable risk factors include a family history of hypertension, age over 65, and comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease [CKD] (World Health Organization, WHO, 2021). Since hypertension is mostly asymptomatic, most people are unaware they have it, earning it the moniker “silent killer.” If symptoms exist, they are often nonspecific and may include headaches, fatigue, nosebleeds, irregular heartbeats, vision changes, and ear buzzing (WHO, 2022). Because of the serious damage that hypertension causes to essential body organs such as the kidney, heart, eyes, brain, and so on, it is recommended that the problem be identified and treated as soon as possible to avoid rapid progression to unwanted sequela.
I plan to work with adult hypertensive patients during my practicum. Patients with a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg, or those who are currently taking hypertensive medications, fall into this category. According to WHO (2021), an estimated 1.28 billion adults aged 30-79 worldwide have hypertension, with two-thirds of them living in low-to-middle-income countries.
Approximately 46% of adults with hypertension are unaware of their condition, and approximately 42% are diagnosed and treated (WHO, 2021). Furthermore, it is estimated that only one in every five adults (21%) has hypertension under control. As a result, while efforts to control hypertension have long existed, more efforts are still required to meet the global target of a 33% reduction in hypertension prevalence between 2010 and 2030 (WHO, 2021). Adult hypertensive patients would be a potentially valuable population for my practicum.
Hypertension contributes significantly to the global burden of CVD and premature death. In 2015, there were approximately 10.7 million all-cause deaths associated with a systolic blood pressure of ?110-115 mm Hg (19.2% of all deaths) and 7.8 million (14% of all deaths) all-cause deaths associated with a systolic blood pressure of ?140 mm Hg (Mills et al., 2020). Various CVDs were responsible for these deaths, including ischemic heart disease (IHD), ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. In addition to CVD events, several studies have shown that hypertension is a significant independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
In one study, 332544 men aged 35-57 years who were screened for entry into the MRFIT trial and did not have ESRD at baseline were followed for 16 years, and when compared to normotensive men with a systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg, the findings revealed that the relative risk of ESRD for men with hypertension who had a systolic BP >210 mmHg or diastolic BP >120 mmHg was 22.1 [P < 0.001] (Mills et al., 2020).
Additionally, individuals with hypertension in the United States (US) are estimated to have nearly $ 2,000 higher annual healthcare expenditures than their non-hypertensive peers, and hypertension is associated with approximately $131 billion in healthcare costs (Kirkland et al., 2018). With the obvious burden of hypertension, it is only necessary to work on strategies to lessen the disease’s impact.
Nurses are frequently the first point of contact for patients. As a Baccalaureate-prepared nurse, I am trained to provide quality patient care, including initial review at the emergency unit, blood pressure measurements, diagnosis, treatment advice, or referral to a physician or other specialists. The interventions we provide to this group of patients must be aimed at lowering blood pressure and preventing the progression to unfavorable sequelae.
According to Rahimi et al. (2021), every 10 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP significantly reduces the risk of major CVD events by 20% (relative risk 0.80, 95% CI 0.77–0.83), IHD by 17% (relative risk 0.83, 0.78–0.88), stroke by 27% (relative risk 0.73, 0.68–0.77), heart failure by 28% (relative risk 0.72, 0.67–0.78) and all-cause mortality by 13% (0.87, 0.84–0.91). This indicates that even nurses’ efforts to assist hypertensive patients in managing their blood pressure count, and thus, the relevance of my practice to the population group chosen.
As the adult population with hypertension grows, it becomes more difficult for healthcare professionals to assist their patients with blood pressure control. According to the American Medical Association (AMA), there are five barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in hypertensive patients’ care. First, inaccurate and inconsistent blood pressure measurement techniques may impede hypertension diagnosis and management (AMA, 2018). It is recommended that at least two blood pressure measurements be taken, with the cuff bladder encircling at least 80% of the arm (CDC, 2022), failure of which may result in incorrect readings and the inability to diagnose hypertension.
Second, masked hypertension, which causes patients to appear to have normal blood pressures in the office while having elevated blood pressures outside the office, may contribute to hypertension underdiagnosis. Third, clinical inertia, blamed on the care team, who may be hesitant to initiate and intensify hypertension treatment, may delay treatment and hasten disease progression (AMA, 2018).