Jhumpa Lahiri eloquently points out in her novel, The Namesake, “For his [Gogol’s] father had a point; the only person who didn’t take Gogol seriously, the only person who tormented him, the only person chronically aware of and afflicted by the embarrassment of his name, the only person who constantly questioned it and wished it were otherwise, was Gogol” (100). In this excerpt the reader explores the implications, consequences, and more of changing one’s legal name. Gogol Ganguli wishes to change his name to his intended good name, or legal name, Nikhil, though he is already eighteen. His father questions his motivations by asking who did not take his son seriously due to his name alone. Gogol, about to embark on a new life in college, wishes to do away with the name he hates and attempt to try on a new identity, one that he has complete control over. This sentence from the novel manifests the protagonist’s search for identity and understanding of self through name, culture, and society.
Get original essayGogol has always hated his name. He never understood why he, and American-born Bengali, was given the last name of a Russian author. In Bengali tradition, a pet name means nothing; a good name holds the meaning for the world. A good name describes the person to all they encounter. His mother’s name, Ashima, means the one without borders. His sister’s name, Sonali, means “she who is golden.” These names allow others to know and interpret the person that stands before them. Gogol, on the other hand, is a pet name, without meaning as far as Gogol can see. It means nothing, it comes from no tradition or culture, and it is merely the surname of a dead author that Gogol’s father adored. A name in this sense can identify a person, and as far as Gogol can see, his name is silly and meaningless, two attributes he does not want to identify with.
Gogol does eventually come to understand the reasoning behind his seemingly thoughtless and meaningless pet name. Knowing the story of his father’s lucky escape from death brings a newfound appreciation for his father, appreciation for his birth name. Even with this, knowing that his name marks the reason his father and consequently he exists does not solve the issue of identity. Gogol remains lost in a world full of confident, assured Americans that know who they are, where they came from, and where they are going. Gogol is constantly searching for his identity. He like the passage claims “constantly questioned it.” He questions his parent’s life, his culture, his heritage, and his role in the American society.
For the majority of the novel Gogol spends his time searching for an identity as an American, rejecting the heritage of his family and the confusion of the names they give. Gogol wants nothing to do with the people that remain unchanging, foreign, and primitive when the world he is immersed in at school and with friends is full of new interesting ideas and experiences. Here experimentation, love, excitement, indulgence, and risk fill the gaping holes of Gogol’s unknown identity. He is continually searching for himself in others as he moves from one love to another. His relationships with women, not unlike his exploration of different American lifestyles, demonstrate his constant questioning of identity. Along this journey of lifestyles there is one that he tries to continually reject. He rejects his parents’ Indian-American lifestyle, or at least he is convinced that he has.
The fact is that despite his attempts to explore identities of other Americans, he never truly rids himself of who he is. He is a Bengali-American. He never strays too far from his parents, and though he begrudges their way of life he also appears to find some solace in it. After his father’s death it was Indian tradition that comforted him. Though sometimes he keeps his shoes on in the house, many times he openly respects the traditions that his mother keeps. He speaks in Bengali with his parents, not always translating for those around him. At the same time, he is an avid member of the American economy and culture. He is an educated architect with an expansive knowledge. He is an independent man that is simply searching to understand life. This is no different than most. The key thing that Gogol is missing is the knowledge that humanity, not just him as an individual, struggles with identity in all its forms. Names, cultures, society, relationships, and family all contribute to one’s identity, but none are the sole provider for that identity. It seems that Ashoke, Gogol’s father is aware of this truth as he questions why his son must change a name that in one sense, means the world, but in another, means absolutely nothing.
Plagued by the name that began his disorientation in life, Gogol attempts to start fresh, as he does many times, by changing what he believes is the reason for the demise of his identity. He never stops questioning himself, his names, his actions, his past, or his future. His simply lives, like many do, in search for a greater understanding.
Last summer, I was lucky enough to have an unforgettable experience when my grandma brought our extended family on a vacation to Tanzania for a few weeks. While we did spend a large amount of the time watching wildlife in the Serengeti, the most memorable part of the trip for me was learning about the local culture. I was fascinated by how hospitable everybody there was. Therefore I want to describe my family vacation in this essay.
Get original essayWhenever we rode anywhere in the ‘safari trucks’, the local children would, at the sight of the trucks, sprint to the side of the road to wave and shout “jambo”. I could tell by their huge smiles that they were genuinely happy at the sight of us, not just reciting how they’d been told to act in front of tourists. Anyone was happy to return a wave or a high five, too.
At one point when our guide was showing us around a local village, a woman came over and started talking to us in Swahili, which our guide translated for us. The woman wanted to show us the baby rabbits that she was raising. “Karibu,” she said, welcoming us into her house. I was very surprised by this. I would never think of inviting a stranger off the street into my house back in the United States. But here, it seemed like the norm. The woman was so hospitable and kind, treating us as if we were family.
After we saw the super cute newborn rabbits, we continued through the village. At the next house, there was a family cooking fish over a fire for dinner. Our guide asked if he could buy some. While he ate his fish, the family invited us into their yard. Everybody’s attitude was so different than people back home, who now seemed boringly morose. Things that seemed so unusual to me, like letting strangers into my house, were completely normal to these people.
I was mollified by how hospitable everyone in Tanzania was. Even in the most remote areas, the people were so friendly, and it was clear that hospitality was ingrained in their culture. I felt a deep connection to the people there, and it was one of the few times in my life that I felt truly welcomed.
When the trip ended and we got back to the United States, I almost felt a closer connection to the people I met in Tanzania than people at home. I realized that we have so much to learn from other cultures and their ways of life. It was a valuable lesson in cultural diversity and the importance of being open to new experiences. It also made me reflect on my own behavior and how I treat strangers. It was a humbling experience that I will never forget.
In conclusion, my trip to Tanzania was an eye-opening and enriching experience. I learned so much about the culture and people, and it opened my mind to different ways of life. The hospitable nature of the people left a deep impression on me, and it was one of the most welcoming experiences I have ever had. I believe that this experience will stay with me forever, and it has changed the way I view the world.
Song of Solomon, by Toni Morrison, explores how each character searches for something, and the novel examines the ways in which they cope when they cannot find it. In the novel, many of the characters are trapped by their materialistic desires. The need to fulfill those desires erodes their souls, making them bitter. For some of these characters, their wants and needs are in the form of gold. Song of Solomon examines the human condition of being physically, spiritually, and financially trapped through the classic symbol of desire, gold.
Get original essayThe protagonist, Milkman, is trapped physically and mentally. He feels as though his life has no meaning, and that if he could leave his situation on Not Doctor Street, he could be happy. From the time he was little, Milkman wanted freedom and escape from his life, or to “fly away.” He becomes sad and isolated from his friends and later, isolated from his family. He feels as though his future is defined by the events of his past and is constantly troubled by other people’s problems. He believes that he has done nothing to deserve the burden of the knowledge that people have given him and is too far inside himself to appreciate the love that his family members provide him. His desire to escape his life is shown when Morrison says “He wanted the money - desperately, he believed - but other than making tracks out of the city, far away from Not Doctor Street, Sonny’s Shop, and Mary’s Place, and Hagar, he could not visualize a life that much different from the one he had. New People. New Places. Command. That was all he wanted in his life” (179, 180). Milkman finally finds an opportunity to escape his life through his aunt Pilate’s gold.
For Milkman, the gold represents what he has always desired, freedom and flight. This is shown when Morrison describes Milkman and Guitar’s first encounter with what they thought was gold: “They both saw it [the sack of gold] at the same time. It hung heavy, hung green like the green of Easter eggs left too long in the dye. And like Easter, it promised everything: the Risen Son and the heart’s lone desire” (185). The idea of fulfilling this craving and achieving happiness makes Milkman selfish and cruel, causing him to betray his loving aunt by robbing her. When he discovers that Pilate does not have the gold, he goes on a journey to find it where he finds himself along the way. After gaining a sense of identity, the journey becomes more about freeing himself mentally than finding the gold and escaping physically. He has an epiphany where he is overcome with happiness and realizes that he no longer desires escape from his family’s problems or his life, and in the same way, gives up on finding the gold. This is described by Morrison’s quote, “[H]e felt a sudden rush of affection for them all… Apparently he thought he deserved only to be loved - from a distance, though - and given what he wanted… Maybe all he was really saying was: I am not responsible for your pain, share your happiness with me but not your unhappiness” (278). At the end of the novel, Milkman never finds the gold, but gains a new identity when he realizes that the freedom gold can bring him is not worth the betrayal required to gain it. Milkman's experience supports gold’s symbolism for a worldly desires because his want for gold disappears just as his search for happiness ends. When he gives up what weighs him down, he finally is able to fly. However, other characters are not as fortunate as Milkman is in abandoning the worldly desires that trap them.
Guitar, Milkman's best friend growing up, is strapped financially. He lives in poverty in the South Side of the city and wants so badly to escape and to live a more affluent life. He compares himself to wealthy white people who murder innocent African-Americans, and cannot understand how his situation is fair. He says “[E]verybody wants the life of a black man... Fair is one more thing I’ve given up” (Morrison 222, 224). These internal and external conflicts eat away at him, and he sees no other way to cope than to become a murderer. Like Milkman, he sees gold as an opportunity to free himself through the wealth it can bring him. This is shown when Morrison writes “...he [Milkman] wondered if Guitar simply could not resist the lure of something he had never had-money” (180). He speaks to Milkman about all the things gold can buy him, not knowing that the gold will lead him to attack his best friend. His perspective is ironic because once, while giving Milkman advice, he says ”[A]ll that jewelry weighs it [the peacock[ down… Can’t nobody fly with all that shit. Wanna fly, you got to give up the shit that weighs you down” (179). His viewpoint shows that, like the peacock’s tail, materialistic desires weigh down your soul, and you must give them up in order to be free. This contradicts his obsession with wealth, which ultimately weighs him down to the point of committing murder and betrayal. When Milkman gives up on finding the gold, Guitar continues. In the end, Guitar remains trapped by his greed and obsession with bettering his life financially through the gold, which comes to a head when he kills Pilate.
Macon Dead, Milkman's father, is a slave to his desire for property and power, making him spiritually trapped. A humble farm boy turned-wealthy realtor, he is bitter about his past. After witnessing his father's murder as a boy, he runs away where he finds gold, beginning his desire for wealth and power that last for the rest of his life. “Gold… Life, safety, and luxury fanned out before him like the tail-spread of a peacock, and as he stood there trying to distinguish each delicious color, he saw the dusty boots of his father standing just on the other side of the shallow pit… Pilate darted around the cave calling him, looking for him, while Macon piled the sacks of gold into the tarpaulin” (170, 171), describes his transformation from a humble farm boy to a money-hungry man trapped by his craving for property and prosperity. As the quote describes, Macon is indifferent to the ghost of his father whom he claimed to care so much about. While he believes that wealth will be the solution to all of his problems, it actually isolates him from his family and the people who love him. The traumatic event of his father's murder changed him, as Morrison describes what she writes "[T]he numbness that had settled on him when he saw the man he loved and admired fall off the fence; something wild ran through him when he watched the body twitching in the dirt” (50, 51). This, combined with his desire for money, rejection by his wife's father, and later, witnessing his wife kiss her father’s dead fingers, turns Macon into a cold, heartless, and broken man. He is trapped by his sadness, anger, and hunger for power, making him spiritually disconnected from love, his family, and immaterial things in life. When the possibility of obtaining gold resurfaces, he is naturally drawn in and gets behind the scheme of robbing his own sister, Pilate. The prosperity that gold could bring him is just another form of psychological imprisonment for Macon, pushing him farther from his sister and from love. His want for gold is stronger than his want for love, family, and loyalty, showing gold’s symbolism for desire.
In Song of Solomon, the main characters are trapped by their materialistic desires, which are symbolized by gold. Milkman, Guitar, and Macon, each see gold as a way to fulfil aspects of their lives that are missing. Gold’s symbolism for worldly desires is consistent with the fact that Pilate had no interest in the gold when she in Macon found it. Instead, she took her father's bones with her, showing that she cares more about spiritual value than she does about materialistic value. This reinforces gold’s symbolism for acquisitive desires because Pilate does not chase the gold; the three men each have different materialistic desires, so they do pursue the gold. The wealth that comes from the gold is a temptation for the men because it seems like a solution each of their problems and an end to their longings. However, their attempts to retrieve the gold push them closer into deception and farther away from their loved ones, until Guitar becomes a murderer and Macon becomes cold and dead (hence his last name). In the end, Milkman is the only one of the three that abandons his need for “gold” and realizes the true value of the people in his life and of himself.
Defying the existence of good and evil continues to be widely debated in the field of philosophy of religion, specifically when debating the moral capabilities of God. The existence of evil and suffering in the world poses serious issues for the existence of God. More specifically, for the existence of an omnipotent, benevolent, and omniscient God. The purpose of this essay is to develop a general argument for the claim that good and evil both have to exist and to explain what absolute good and evil are. Also, to dive into the question: why would God allow for evil? I intend to show that there is a reason as to why God would allow for evil that does not undermine his omnipotence or power. The world requires amount of balance in all aspects. If either good or evil were to eliminate the other then this balance would be disrupted. Since we do not live in a perfect world of absolutes, this cannot occur, making the topic of good vs evil much more complex.
Get original essay“Evil” and “good” are both broad terms that must be defined before considering their absolutes. First, I will get into the term “evil.” I will define evil in two ways: a broad concept and a narrow concept. Evil in the broad sense can further be divided into two categories: natural evil and moral evil. Natural evil is known as evil for which “no non-diving agent can be held morally responsible for its occurrence.” An example of natural evil would be an earthquake or a hurricane. On the other hand, moral evil is inflicted by humans. For example, a robber shooting an innocent human. These two forms of evil in the broad sense are generally the type of evil that is referenced in theological frameworks, such as the problem of evil, which I will get into later. Moreover, evil in the narrow sense relates to moral judgements. For example, moral aspects of actions, characters, events, and so forth. This could be anything from walking an elderly woman across the street to helping your neighbor take their groceries out of their car. The narrow concept holds human beings as moral agents. So, in this context, the occurrence of evil is thought of to be caused by human action. This form of evil is generally the kind of evil that is referenced in political and legal situations.
Now that I have defined the precepts for good and evil I will discuss the terms in “absolute” form. If something is an absolute good that means that it is good because of something in itself. It does not require the opinion or validation of other people. That means that it will still be good even if no one bears witness to its goodness. In my opinion, absolute good is being good for the sake of being good. You don’t care if anyone is around to see you be good. It is more important to be a good person on moral principle than it is to be a good person strictly for the sake of appearances. Conversely, absolute evil is when an entity is completely and totally immoral and malevolent to its core. Absolute evil is the absence of absolute good. On the other hand, absolute good is all of the things that absolute evil is lacking. This could be empathy, compassion or simple kindness.
The problem of evil refers to the issue of how an omnibenevolent (all good), omniscient (all knowing), and omnipotent (all powerful) God would allow the existence of evil. How could such a God allow for the existence of human suffering, premature death, and gross moral misconduct? Clearly, there’s a major problem. In spite of the problem of evil, some philosophers reject that God is all-powerful and all-knowing. This seems to be able to get God “off the hook” with regards to evil. Those who take this approach accept a limited God. These people still believe that God is good and the greatest possible being. However, they question whether this being is truly omnipotent and omniscient. Proponents of this view believe that God is not actually all powerful and cannot know everything. Therefore, he cannot control the future. Because of this handicap, He has no control over the evil in the world. However, this idea would require that some faiths question their most fundamental tenets. If God is not omnipotent and omniscient then is there really a God?
The fact that God allows for evil to happen discredits the idea that there is even a God. If there was truly some absolutely benevolent, all powerful God then he simply would not allow evil to exist. Personally, I believe that the presence of so much evil and cruelty in the world demonstrates that God, at least as we know Him, does not exist. This is not saying that God Himself doesn’t exist, but merely that we must change the way that we think of God. Maybe He is not some amazing omnipotent thing. All humans have their flaws and, if God created humans and modeled them after Himself, then this would mean that God is flawed as well. This could be one reason for God allowing evil in the world. He simply could not be as omnipotent and morally perfect as we have been led to believe.
However, it is possible to maintain the belief that God is all-powerful while simultaneously recognizing the existence of evil: God allows for evil to demonstrate to humans that not everything can be perfect. If god did not allow for evil to happen in the world than it could upset the balance of life. If everything in the world is too perfect and too good then people would become bored. In turn, this could cause people to act out and maybe even commit acts of evil themselves. God could allow for evil as a way to keep the natural cycle of life going. Maybe God does not want the world to be happy and mechanically perfect at all times. Maybe it cannot even be so.
In regards to natural evil, such as diseases, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, etc. some may argue that this is a part of an orderly process of nature. People who argue this believe that natural evil stems from the combination of deterministic laws, which state that everything happens because of strict laws in nature. Everything has a cause and an effect. Evil can be situational and natural evil is something that seems to be necessary in the world.
Another response to the problem of evil is known as the free will defense. This adds another premise to the problem of evil which goes as follows: it is impossible for God to create free beings and further promise that these beings will never do anything evil. This view holds that free will is so important that it is worth the price of evil. The argument against free will, as laid out by Louis J. Pojman, is that 1. To be really free and responsible for our actions, we must be the cause of what we are (our states of mind). 2. No one is the cause of one’s self. Not even God is causa sui. 3. So no one is really free and responsible. The root of Pojman’s argument is that there isn’t actually free will. We are not the cause of our states of mind and we are not the cause of oneself. Due to this fact a person can’t be free or responsible. If free will is really worth the price of evil then God’s omnipotence is thus brought into question again. Also, if free will doesn’t really exist then maybe it’s human nature that’s inherently evil.
Another response is the soul-making theodicy defense created by John Hick, which stems from the free will defense. The soul-making theodicy argues that God allows some evil in the world because it builds one’s positive character. According to Hick, the world is an arena that fosters moral development. So essentially all evil in the world will contribute to the greater good of the people. Hick holds that if the world were a perfect world and there were no possibility of suffering, pain, and death, then we could not be held accountable for our actions and we would have no opportunities to prove our virtue. This view also contends that humanity was made in the image of God, but not God’s likeness. So the world is a place where humans have the ability to develop their character into the complete likeness of God. This positive growth outweighs the negative value of evil in itself.
Even with the freewill and the theodicy defense, the problem of evil still remains. One of the major criticisms is that God who is supposed to be all powerful, all knowing, and omnipotent does not intervene on the evil in the world. Couldn’t an all-knowing God have expected or seen in advance the suffering in the world and created a world in which people do not commit as much evil as they do now? And why does God not intervene upon events that cause suffering on a global scale, such the Holocaust? Following Hicks, one could respond that He abstains from action in order to teach people a lesson and allow them to build their character. But this seems to be inefficient. If God is omnipotent then He should have been powerful and intelligent enough to provide humans with free will, the ability to learn from our mistakes, and still been able to create a world where feedback could be made available. This would in turn hopefully prevent evil from occurring. One would hope that there is a better way teach people morality without giving allowing for all the consequences of evil.
It can be argued that good cannot exist without evil or that evil is needed as a counterpart to good. This can be seen as a way to solve the problem of evil. It does this by setting a limit as to God’s capabilities, implying that God cannot create good without also creating evil at the same time. However, this means that God is not omnipotent. Or there is a limit as to what an omnipotent thing can do, which contradicts the very meaning of omnipotent. This goes back to the very idea that maybe God doesn’t exist if he isn’t all powerful. Thus leading to people beginning to question their faith yet again. Good and evil are not able to eliminate another once and for all. You need good in the world to know what the evil is and you need the evil in the world to be able to see all of the good. One could never eliminate the other because there would always be people that would still be doing good acts or evil acts. You need to have one in order to have the other. Without that, it couldn’t even be considered absolute. It would just be the new normal. Additionally, according to Mackie this solution is implausible because he rejects the claim that any quality must have a counterpart. Mackie contends that if an entity is bigger than another entity then there also has to be an entity that is smaller than that entity. But then this would mean that good and evil are not opposed because good does not try to eliminate evil to its greatest ability, but instead needs it. In conclusion, it can be seen that the free will argument is the most plausible response for defending the omnipotence and morally perfect characteristics of God in the presence of evil. It is better that God created free beings who sin than humans who mechanically do good as a result of determinism. It keeps balance in the world. By having free will humans can exercise their freedom and work towards bettering themselves and engage in soul building. The free-will defense comes with issues such as the claim that an omnipotent God could have done better in creating a world with less suffering.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayHowever, I accept these issues because one truly does not know God’s motivations and the best possible world. How is one to say that this isn’t the best possible world? Although we can conceive of a greater possible world, truly there is no way of knowing.
In comics, it’s never hard to find a good villain to go with every hero: Superman has Lex, Batman has the Joker, and Space Ghost has Zorak. In fact, it’s difficult to find a classic comic in which there is not a clear protagonist and antagonist. Traditionally, there has always been one hero to combat his or her arch-nemesis. However, in Alan Moore’s Watchmen, there is no clear opponent for the heroes to contest. Instead, we are set up with six central characters who spend most of the novel searching for the villain. While each of the six is almost totally unique, the main heroes of Watchmen are presented in paralleling pairs: Rorschach with Ozymandias, Dr. Manhattan with The Comedian, and Nite Owl II with the second Silk Spectre.
Get original essayThe most surprising of these pairs is that of Rorschach and Ozymandias. While it would most certainly appear that the two heroes—or more properly termed anti-heroes—are in every way different, they share one strikingly similar trait. Rorschach is raised in the slums of the city by his mother, a prostitute. He is an ugly, poor, private, and almost worthless man. Not even able to pay his rent, he spends his days roaming New York City as a vagrant mute doomsday prophet holding a placard reading "The End Is Nigh." After the passing of the Keene Act, Rorschach remains an active superhero in open defiance of the law. Ozymandias, on the other hand is a handsome, rich, public, and powerful man. When he is left the fortune of his parents at age 17, he gives every cent he has to charity, only to earn it all back by his own hand. In anticipation of the Keene Act, Ozymandias retires two years before the law is passed. While Ozymandias is a giving liberal, Rorschach is a near fascist. Superficially, the two characters are in no way similar.
However, the two anti-heroes firmly share a common belief: the ends justify the means. As a moral absolutist, Rorschach views every act as absolutely right or wrong, devoid of the context of the act. Accordingly, he feels all evil should be punished swiftly and violently. This absolutism is reflected in his mask—the white and black patterns on the mask are always shifting and morphing, but they remain completely separate at all times; there is never a gray area.
A childhood fan of Harry S Truman, Rorschach admires the ability to make tough, morally just decisions for the good of the people. Throughout the novel, we find that in order to acquire the information needed to achieve a moral goal, Rorschach will unflinchingly break the fingers of those whom he knows are in no way involved in the crime. It does not matter what needs to be done to reach his objective—the ends justify the means.
Ozymandias has the same belief, though he carries it out on a much different scale. To do what he feels must be done in order to save humanity from itself, he gives several people cancer, murders numerous others, and in the end obliterates half the population of New York City. However, he feels his actions are totally justified for the cause of ending the Cold War and uniting the world under one cause. While Rorschach commits a large number of relatively minor violent deeds throughout his entire life, Ozymandias spends several years building up to the execution of one gigantic act. However, the concept behind both characters’ actions is the same.
The parallels between the two are further suggested in “Chapter V: Fearful Symmetry,” which focuses almost totally on Rorschach and Ozymandias. This volume of the novel is perfectly symmetrical in nearly every way. That is to say that the first and last pages (and all corresponding pages in between) have perfectly mirrored paneling, the same characters per page, and the same plot; the entire episode is split perfectly down the center. To allow readers to relate the two characters to each other, Moore portrays the two anti-heroes as being total opposites, although each is attempting to perform acts he believes will change humanity. In this regard, it is clear that Rorschach and Ozymandias are meant to be completely opposite characters in nearly every way except for this single, but overwhelming, trait.
Another pair presented to readers is that of Dr. Manhattan and The Comedian. These two heroes are the only ones in the story who choose to keep their identities secret and become registered with the US government after the passing of the Keene Act. Throughout the novel, the effects of one’s life prompts the other’s.
The Comedian starts his career as a vigilante at a very young age, where his behavior is less than exemplary. After a meeting of a group of masked heroes, he attempts and fails to sexually assault the Silk Spectre (whom we will refer to as Sally Jupiter for clarity purposes). It is discovered afterwards that the two later have an intimate relationship and that The Comedian is actually the father of Sally Jupiter’s child, who later becomes the second Silk Spectre (whom we will refer to simply as the Silk Spectre).
Dr. Manhattan, originally Jon Osterman, chooses early in his adulthood to lead the life of an ordinary watch-maker, until his father pushes him into becoming a nuclear physicist. During his work under this profession, Jon is caught in a nuclear accident in an experimental testing chamber, and is transformed into the only true "superhero" of the novel -- for he is the only one to have truly superhuman powers. From there, Osterman is led into being a hero by the US government due to his amazing abilities. Soon after his transformation, Dr. Manhattan meets and begins an intimate relationship with Silk Spectre.
After the Keene Act is passed, the government has Manhattan and The Comedian team up to help the US win the war in Vietnam. Here, both heroes begin to feel distanced from the rest of humanity and begin to take on the philosophy of nihilism, where they no longer believe in the morality of any actions. The Comedian displays this with his past sexual assault of Sally Jupiter as well as the murder of the mother of his unborn child in Vietnam. Dr. Manhattan’s views are much more blatant, such as when he decides to exile himself to Mars in a time of potential nuclear annihilation of the planet during the Cold War. In fact, after deciding to let humanity decide its own fate, the Silk Spectre is the only one who can convince him to return to Earth and save the human race. This is because she is the only person who was ever important to Manhattan (after his transformation), just as her mother, Sally Jupiter, was the only person who was ever important to The Comedian. Although The Comedian and Dr. Manhattan appear to be very different characters, they are surprisingly related.
The final pairing of heroes in the novel is that of the Nite Owl II (whom we will refer to simply as Nite Owl) and the Silk Spectre, also known as Laurie Juspeczyk. The two are remarkably similar, and each seems to be the opposite gender counterpart to the other.
Laurie first begins her crime-fighting career when she is virtually forced into it by her mother. After Sally Jupiter retires, she pushes her daughter into taking her place to become the second Silk Spectre. The case is similar with Nite Owl, Dan Dreiberg. Before him, there had been the original Nite Owl, Hollis Manson. Upon retiring, Manson receives letters from Dreiberg asking for permission to take over the name, to which Manson gladly accepts. Both Laurie and Dan took over for a vigilante before them, keeping the same name. It only seems appropriate that while Sally Jupiter and Hollis Manson once were good friends, Laurie and Dreiberg should share an even stronger acquaintance during their generation.
The only notable difference between the two is due to their respective backgrounds. Dreiberg’s banker father leaves him a fortune upon his death, which is used to fund the many high-tech gadgets and weaponry Nite Owl uses to fight crime. Based on his ability to build a submarine and flying ship entirely by himself, it can be assumed that Dreiberg is incredibly intelligent. Laurie, however, employs no such devices, and instead relies solely on her great fighting prowess for her vigilantism.
Also, most of Dreiberg’s psychological issues are much more subtle than that of his colleagues, namely Laurie’s strained relationship with her mother. Like Manson before him, Dreiberg is friendly, honest, and affable, much like Laurie. Laurie is a liberal-thinking, modern woman, and she is vocal in her feminist and humanitarian concerns. She shares many of the same characteristics as Dan, and the two connect on a level unlike any of the other characters in the novel—meaning, sexually. However, it would appear that while the Silk Spectre prefers to live her life as her alter ego Laurie, Dreiberg prefers life as the Nite Owl. The scene in which he attempts to make love to Laurie reveals that he is impotent and self-doubting while in the guise of Daniel Dreiberg. However, later on, it is revealed that he is able to function sexually at a sufficient level while he is the Nite Owl.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayIn Watchmen, there is no clear villain for the heroes to go after. However, Moore more than makes up for this by presenting seemingly unrelated characters in very correlated pairs. While at first these heroes may appear to be superficially unique, they are actually tied together in a series of complex ways that require further attention to fully understand. This technique is arguably far more sophisticated than the standard reading of a good-guy versus bad-guy schematic, as it provides a mystery through the length of the story while still allowing for much deeper reading to keep the audience interested.
Google is an American multinational company that works in internet related services and products. Google’s mission has been “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”. Google offers services designed for office and productivity, mailing, schedulers and time management tools, cloud storage, social networking, instant messaging and video chat, language translation, mapping and navigation, video sharing, note keeping, photo organising and editing, operating system, web browser, hardware products. The culture at Google has been that of flexibility, creativity, fun environment, valuing people and diversity, navigating ambiguity, innovation, thinking 10x and employee first mentality.
Get original essayThe Trust & Safety department at Google is responsible for online safety across Google products. The main functions of the department include fighting web abuse and fraud by designing algorithms and policies that can best combat them. The department works cross functionally across various other departments like the legal department, the developers at Google, the policy team etc.
Few of the Google products that I worked with include Google Search, Google Shopping, Google Adsense, Google Adwords, G Suite, Gmail, YouTube, Google Maps, Google Tez and Google Play.
Tools/Methodologies used GAP Analysis: Process was studied in depth and GAP analysis was done on the same to provide recommendations that address the gaps. In depth interviews: In-depth interviews with Google program managers, vendor program managers and leads were conducted to understand the current processes that are in place.
Mapping Process Flow Diagrams: Process Flow diagrams were mapped out of the current process and suggested process to aid in better understanding of gaps and suggestions. Requirement gathering: For dashboard design, requirements from all Google program managers were assimilated through in-depth interviews to address all the requirements.
Identifying the right metrics: All HR metrics pertaining to vendor data were analysed and right metrics were selected for the dashboard based on insights accumulated and IDIs.
Glance into the culture at Google - Google encourages its employees to question the status quo and provide 10X solutions after thinking out of the box. Googlers navigate ambiguity very well and new employees are encouraged to do the same. Mistakes are encouraged as long as we learn from it and improvise our solutions based on it. Documentation is key as most pet projects at Google end up being Google products and there should be source documentation available for ready reference.
SQL Reporting - An internal google tool was used in the project to create an automated monthly mailer that has reports data visualisation for all metrics required by program managers. SQL, Html, Jinja template was used for the same.
Data Visualisation -The monthly email report and few dashboard templates created required the best possible data visualisation for the metrics involved.
Understanding of Google Products - A basic understanding of how trust and safety works across all google product areas.
With the current boom in online media platforms, there has been an explosive growth in content available online. This huge amount of data needs to be regulated and controlled to prevent spam, fraud and abuse. Cybersecurity team in an internet related organisation thus plays the crucial part in monitoring content. Since most of the content is abusive, letting a human reviewer moderate such content can be hazardous to the mental and emotional wellbeing of an employee. Artificial intelligence and machine learning plays a vital role in such a setting. ML and AI bots weed out abusive content through algorithms that are designed to recognise and delete harmful content. But the question of how far these self-learning bots can be trusted with content remains questionable and must be evaluated.
Google Inc. is an American based company that specializes in internet-related products and services (best known for their search engine). The company has steadily developed to become one of the best companies in the world since its creation in 1998. Google Inc. functions in an industry that is unprecedently unique and dynamic and has much different characteristics from its counterparts in the business world. The Internet industry is dynamic and is characterized by frequent adjustments of rising technologies and continuous revolutions. To stay pertinent, companies depend on tech-based solutions and exception strategies. Google Inc. is currently the best in the industry. This can be attributed to a healthy blend of distinct components and strategies, understanding its external environment/competitors and pursuance of attainable goals and objectives. Executive Summary
Get original essayGoogle Inc. was created in 1998 by its extremely talented co-owners Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Initially, Google Inc. focused on providing customers with web-based search services with their Google Web Search engine. Currently, Google has 65%+ market share in the United States. Google harnesses the highest market share of all companies in its industry. Over the course of its existence, Google has drastically progressed in many ways by designing and offering a range of other internet-related products and services. Among them are search tools, communication and publishing tools, advertising services, security tools, development tools, map-related products, statistical tools, mobile and desktop applications, operating systems, cloud platform and Google Fiber, among others.
Google has been extremely assertive, ambitioius, innovative, and profitable. On its surface there doesn’t appear to be a problem for Google Inc., but all corporations must contnue to sustain improvement and evolve in the information technology industry. Google had diversified and advanced so many of its products beyond their infamous search engine that they made every company in the technology very intimated of them. They are at a decisive position in the development of their corporation, and need to find an answer to the question of, “What should Google Do?”.
Porters Five Forces Model: Power of suppliers – there are content providers and application developers as suppliers of Google. Being a key player in its ecosystem, its suppliers do not have much power on Google. Threat of new entrants – it is unlikely to have new entrants because of high barriers to entry such as capital and infrastructure requirements. However, there are possible threats of new search technologies. Threat of substitutes – there is no potential threat of substitutes due to users’ high reliance on Internet technologies. Degree of Competition – intense competitors among few competitors such as Microsoft and Yahoo!, but not as competent in search engines as Google.
(1) Staying focused in Search area: Googles search engine is its core business and Google has excellent expertise and position in this area. Googles search algorithms still need to be improved upon. Rather than letting competitors to take credit, Google should develop optimized search solutions gaining first mover advantage. Google can also expand to content- analytics areas providing analytical data to businesses which it has been doing for its advertisers. Lastly, staying focused in the search area it complies with Google’s mission making the world’s information accessible and useful. Argument against this option: Google has become almost a monopoly in Internet online advertising and hence, gathered attention from authorities concerning antitrust issues which might limit Google’s freedom in transactions such as collaboration with Yahoo!. Relying soley on the past winning formula would be risky for an organization like Google operating in the technological industry. Lastly, Search industry will be matured in the near future, therefore, has limited growth potential. (2) Becoming a developed portal: This option would allow Google to expand its coverage into different areas which would also help its search engine and advertising. A developed portal would give customers value-adding services as a portal might increase customer loyalty. Finally, Google already has some expertise in this area from development of products such as Gmail and Google Docs, implying that it is relatively less risky. Argument against this option: Market competition is intense with giant competitors such as Yahoo! and MSN. The customers of these competitors would not easily switch from them. Secondly, it‘s difficult to differentiate yourself in the portal business because all portals have very similar features. Finally, It does not align with Google’s mission according to Google’s CEO Mr. Schimdt. (3) Venturing into desktop apps: Desktop applications is a potentially large market. P.C. applications can with integrated with its cloud computing services adding value to those customers that have the need of mobility. Argument against this option: This option would be very hard hard for Google Inc. to compete with microsoft. While Google has developed web-based applications through Google Docs, it is not as experienced and well-known as Microsoft in this area. Its web-based applications are not as fully-featured as Microsoft’s. It would be reasonable to assume that Customers will not switch from Microsoft because of high switching costs and new skill requirements. Finally, once again this does not align with Google’s mission. (4) Providing e-commerce services: The e-commerce market is also another still-growing market, especially in emerging economies. With its offices all over the world and its search interface being available in more than 110 languages, Google can expand its e-commerce into those economies. With its own payment system, Google Checkout, Google can compete with eBay’s Paypal service. Google‘s search techniques such as personalized search can be a tool in providing highly relevant linkage between buyers and sellers which can be an advantage over eBay. Argument against this option: Google does not have expertise in e-commerce business, concerning with areas such as customer relationship management and marketing, compared with eBay, an established ecommerce intermediary with millions of customers in U.S.
As Schmidt said, Google does best in “Search”. It has gained a competitive advantage in search engine industry by improving its search technologies, for example, personalized search. Advertisers are drawn to Google because its network provides more search traffic and it has a unique Cost-Per-Click rate. In addition, the search engine industry is currently in its rapid growth stage which creates opportunities for Google. However, there are competitors such as Microsoft and Yahoo! competing with Google. Although, in 2005, Google landed the deal with AOL, its competitors may offer more aggressively in the future since network affiliates are very important for Internet advertising companies which implies Google should either raise the bid or attract AOL with other values. By the same token, search algorithms are not optimized yet, allowing opportunities for improvement. Therefore, there are a lot of areas for improvement in the search engine area to maintain its dominant position in the industry. Still, the search engine industry will be matured soon, which means that although it is a ‘star’ right now, it will turn into a ‘cash cow’. Therefore, Google should start moving towards new areas such as portal, ecommerce and PC applications. Google is one of the few organizations with strong culture and beliefs. When considering new markets, an important factor that needs to be considered is whether the strategy aligns with its mission statement, and accordingly its values, since the backlash against unaligned strategies might be caused within the organization. Since portal business and PC applications business are not aligned with Google’s mission, it should not go into these businesses. For e-commerce, although it may be an unfamiliar area, it has great market growth potential.
Based on the synthesis made on industry and internal analyses, there are two recommendations for Google. The first recommendation is that google needs to improve in search area. Google should stay focus on its core competencies which is web search and online advertising. It should invest in improving its search solutions and develop products and services to maintain differentiated in Internet advertising. Rather than becoming a full-fledged portal like Yahoo! with a high degree of personalization, Google should focus on developing new features like Gmail which would add value to the search and advertising area. In addition, it should work on its public relations to improve its image being negatively affected by lawsuits concerning with privacy and copyright issues since reputation is also important in search business. The second recommendation for Google is to venture into the e-commerce business. Google should step towards e-commerce business as a market creator like eBay. It can take advantage of its large amount of search traffics to attract customers as well as its advertisers as suppliers. In order to prioritize its efforts, it is recommended to invest 70% of resources into search area, 20% into value-adding features such as Gmail and 10% into new ecommerce business, using its 70/20/10 rule. Conclusion
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essay“We do search”, as written in Google’s Statement of Philosophy, Google’s core business will always be the search business. To be able to maintain a sustainable advantage in the search area, Google needs to improve on its search technologies. Since the search engine industry will mature in the forseeable future, Google also needs to find new markets and develop expertise to dominate those markets, with its mission statement guiding those strategic decisions. Therefore, this report suggests Google to focus in search area as well as to venture into e-commerce business.
Gordon Ramsay has 16 Michelin stars and net worth over $118 Million USD. Gordon is a very terrifying person in kitchen, some say he is just overreacting, that said there are always people who can’t stand Gordon. Writer is going to talk about an interesting fact about Gordon and he also nominated as Top 10 Celebrity Chef in the world. Gordon has bunch of TV’s shows, such as: Hell’s Kitchen, Hotel Hell, The popular MasterChef which award the winner A Quarter Of Million USD. Less but not least writer will also talk about how this 51 years-old Chef make it to the top of the chart and about his life. The writer will dive-in deeper about all these things that has been mentioned above in this essay.
Get original essayGordon James Ramsay was born on November 8, 1966, in Glasgow, Scotland. At the age of 5 he moved and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. Ramsay was fall in love with soccer, set his sight on becoming professional player on soccer league. The Glasglow Rangers, a pro club was the first team that Ramsay joined at the age 15. He spanned 3 years with his team, until 1985, a knee injury ended his career. Returned to study and to earn a degree in hotel management from North Oxon Technical Collage in 1987, honing his culinary skills in London under Chef Marco Pierre White at restaurant Harvey’s and then worked under chef Albert Roux at La Gavrouche.
Followed by three more years of training in France, he became a personal chef aboard in a luxury yacht in the Bahamas. France, In early 1990s, Ramsay prepared classic French cuisine in the kitchens of Chef Joel Robuchon and Guy Savoy. Becoming a head chef of Aubergine in 1993 at London, “Gordon two of a maximum of three stars from the Michelin Guide, a highly regarded hotel- and restaurant-ranking publication”. Ramsay of to set a culinary empire, after the Aubergine’s success. First in Dubai, then followed by overseas eaterie establishments in Tokyo, New York, and LA. At the same time he was becoming more popular not just on British TV, he also first appeared on small TV show in 1998 with Boiling Point, he then continued his quest for more Michelin star.
Aside from his multimillion-dollar restaurant business, Ramsay also became famous both in US and Internationally, with “our top-rated FOX shows that air in more than 200 countries and territories worldwide such as Hell’s Kitchen, Masterchef, Masterchef JR, and Hotel Hell, The F-World, Kitchen Nightmares as well as UK shows: Gordon Behind Bars, Ultimate Cookery Course, Gordon’s Great Escapes and Gordon On Cocaine”. Writer will only elaborate the most popular and hits TV shows around the globe, the first one is about Hell’s Kitchen and Second is MasterChef which both of the show is still on continuation until today.
The world’s first Hell’s Kitchen restaurant is at Caesars Palace, Las Vegas. Inspiration from global hit TV show, starring Gordon Ramsay, Hell’s Kitchen will make the guests feel like on the studio set where there are cameras, crew, and other properties used on TV shows. “The restaurant itself more than 300 guests including two chef’s tables, floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking the famous Las Vegas Strip, red and blue design details in the show kitchen, a private dining room and a contemporary bar serving the latest trends in mixology”. Hell’s Kitchen dishes will be served by both teams, red and blue where the signature dishes of Hell’s Kitchen will be made with the highest quality of ingredients and under Chef Ramsay’s observation.
MasterChef Kitchen is filled with 3 judges and other 16 contestants fighting for the title of ”Winner of MasterChef” and total grand prize of $250, 000 USD. The main judges is Gordon Ramsay as well as the director of this show, there are also other judges, Aarón Sánchez, Joe Bastianich, Graham Elliot, and Christina Tosi.
Chef Gordon Ramsay is not yet on his retirement days, he is still doing TV shows and running his restaurants. There is no ordinary things on every restaurants that Chef Ramsay owned and for that reason some restaurant of his deserved Michelin stars. For example, on Ramsay’s restaurant in Chelsea, London, has held three Michelin stars since 2001, and some of his restaurant also lost stars. Located in New York, in 2014. There is Ramsay’s restaurant losing from two Michelin stars. The total of Chef Ramsay’s Michelin stars is currently 16 based on 26 September 2018 record placing him on 3rd position of the world’s chef with most Michelin stars.
Ramsay’s fearful reputation, high standards make this 51-year-old Scot manage to get $118 Million net worth, “with 16 Michelin Stars in total, GHR (Gordon Ramsay Holdings) manage Ramsay’s business enterprises regularly achieves yearly 8-figure revenues”. The money doesn’t only come from his incredible success in the kitchen, fiery personality on TV shows such as, Kitchen Nightmares, Hell’s Kitchen, MasterChef, and The F-World manage to attract regular millions viewers on every shows Ramsay starred in. Talking about harsh, fiery, and some people call it ”over-acting” personality on Ramsay’s TV Shows, there are people who can’t stand Ramsay’s attitude.
Mark 9:1-8 tells a lot about the story of Jesus and the great thing he did and the symbolic meaning behind his robe when he was resurrected. He was wearing an intensely white attire that could not be done by anyone else but the son of God. Within this paper I will go on and talk about the transfiguration of Jesus. I will use several pieces of information to tie in all the information in the bible. A discussion about Mark and the learning of the Gospel with Mark is going to be an insightful light into what this gospel is trying to say. Also relating other theological themes in the gospel and certain sections. Through the paper I will use attack the areas of symbolism and bring light to this passage. Towards the end of the paper I will go on to talk about topics and how those topics are in relation to the concept of the kingdom of God.
Get original essayThrough my readings and findings through out Achtemeier the article takes many different turns. The article mentions that the author who wrote the gospel Is unidentified and that Mark is an interpreter of Peter. Many believe that the author of the book could have been the fortunate son of a man named Mark. This seems a little to good to be true but many believed that Mark brings a strong message. We tend to think that the author had to of been a male and not a female but with the lack of evidence and sources backing up the information a female could of wrote these gospels just as easy as a man could do it. All though the identify of the author might not be known there are several clues that can be mad based on the teachings and writings she or he displayed throughout the gospel this is all according to. A couple of things are said through out the passage that are not necessarily accurate. Sidon is south of Trye, the Sea of Galilee is in the middle of Decapolis are some of the main things to point out that were not right. From they way the gospel is written and meant the author is believed to of lived outside of Palestine. This can be confirmed in that the authors origins by he or she’s writing technique and message. Mark refers to Jewish customs and traditions to help the reader understand that the readers of the gospel were outside of Palestine. Mark has a strong purpose for writing the gospels however he is not historically accurate. Mark’s goal for writing the gospels was not to solve historical problems he was more trying to solve theological problems this is all according to. Many theologians find Mark’s letters problematic because the letters are not in any type of order and theologians look for things like that to make new discovery’s and really dive deep into Marks writing’s. Since Mark lacks the thought of time or the representation of this the conclusion can be made that Mark did not have a purpose with putting that in the gospels. Mark talks about the rich history of his traditions and about redaction history. The study of this allowed theologians to expand their thinking of the adult life of Jesus from Nazareth. The organization of the Gospel of Mark must indicate where the laid priorities of his overall account of Jesus. This must also be understood in theological terms since Jesus is a strong and powerful figure. The writings of Mark’s gospel are written in theological terms and have very much importance to the story. Throughout the naritive we find other figures along the way, Peter, James, and John were up on a mountain and they see Elijah and Moses appear and they seem to think for some reason they are having a talk with Jesus. Jesus goes on to have a conversation with Elijah and Moses, the conversation leads to several things but Elijah represents the prophets and Moses represents the law. Jesus has this conversation because he doesn’t want to have it with just one prophet he wants to be having this with all of his prophets according to Oden. These two men were not rich and not the brightest but they were important because they withstood tyrants. Elijah only had his sheep skin and little other belongs and Moses had no possessions at all. These men did not like or seem to feel that the rich people where they were from really deserved it or needed it. Elijah and Moses are embraced with love and reign for the Lord the author feels that these two can lead people to Jesus. Going back to the three on the mountain Jesus brought them up there so that they could be isolated from everyone else. The main thing to take away from this is that this mountain is symbolic in the sense that Jesus took them there so that they would be alone and he could reply his message to them. Jesus is trying to decide who the chosen few are to carry out his wishes and he believes these are some of those people so he wants them isolated to hear his word. He does not want any distractions from anything that’s why the mountain is symbolic.
The book written by Strauss shows many key pieces of evidence and shows sections through it. These sections are broken in to three different ones. In the first section Jesus is the chosen one, is the Messiah and Son of God, the second section is showing how he will fulfill these promise in more ways than one, and the third section is to call his supporters and believers to go down the same path as the Messiah and the Lord God. The main thing to take away from everything is Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God. Before the passage many things happen, Jesus talks to his disciples about the sacrifices that the son of man has to take punishment and suffer while also being rejected by elders and priests of many sorts, and to be killed, after those three days he will rise from the dead again. The people cannot believe what they are hearing but Jesus is basically telling them what is going to happen. After the passage Jesus goes on to tell the three prophets they must keep all they know a secret and not revel that information to anyone. Jesus wants to show them when he rises from the dead and proves that he truly is the son of God. A couple of key themes throughout the gospel of Mark for example the kingdom of God, discipleship, and Jesus. Looking back the clouds and voices from the sky when the prophets were on the mountain can be a representation of the kingdom of God. Strauss later goes on to say that has come near because the king or kingdom of god is present. The importance of James, Peter, and John going up the mountain is key because it states that true followers of Christ are willing to follow him up that mountain and believe that he has the answers. They show discipleship by always following him even though they did not through suffering and death.
J. Calvin explains “The revelation of the heavenly glory which Christ began with the resurrection and then more fully offered when he sent the Holy Spirit and worked marvelous deeds of power”. This quotes relates Mark 9:1 and the transfiguration story. God’s kingdom gained power and notion when Jesus resurrected from the dead, this seems to be a common notion throughout the new testament, many others have different beliefs according to. A couple of things to take away from Jesus being resurrected is that Jesus is somewhat transformed when he is resurrected his white attire builds the suspense that he has actually come back from the dead. Another thing to keep in mind is those clouds represent the kingdom of God so when we hear about the clouds over Jesus this is stating that the kingdom of God is with Jesus. In Mark 9:3 it talks about what Jesus was wearing and the importance and significance of his all white attire. Gundry’s commentary states significance about a light, the light Is the appearance of Jesus. Gundry’s Commentary states “The luminosity of the transfiguration brands it as originally and therefore before all the gospels, a luminous appearance of the risen Jesus a luminosity that starts in heaven and descends to earth, but not for an additional trajectory of decreasing luminosity”. This explains the light and who and what Jesus is or what he is capable of and this opens the eyes of the three prophets for know they see him as the true Son of God. Peter, James, and John are very key to the story of Jesus but why were they chosen to handle such a huge task. Jesus believed that the men were worthy enough and knew they would stick by his side throughout thick and thin. Lane goes on to speak about the importance of the high mountains these are the same mountains that Elijah and Moses received a true vision of God. Jesus was seeking many things when he decided upon this mountain he solitude and seeking the perfect place used for the mountain. The transfiguration in the New testament is challenging to understand and has left many people in many difficulties. Lee goes on to try and explain that the story is said to not be believed by many new people trying to learn about the story of Mark. They need to dive deeper and really understand the importance and significance of the resurrection of Jesus or the son of God. Many people see this as a symbol or a sign that things happen not that they actually did in some sense. Many people tend to only think things happen if they see them with their eyes, we have no way of knowing the true details but the book of Mark opens ae eyes to something we couldn’t witness only here about. later goes on to say that many people think the genre of this is out of place that it should have a different genre and not be in the same one as Mark says.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayThe overall thought process of Mark when he was writing this is unclear, we don’t know the true reason he wrote this. We have signs and hints that point us in a direction that he could of taken it but many believe he did this to show people the true meaning and power behind Jesus and his rise from the dead. He is writing this for the Messiah and wants the people to understand why Jesus did what he did. Why he died on the cross for our sins and took that pain and punishment for us.
If you're interested in Gothic architecture, this essay delves into how the Elizabethan Era was a transition period between Gothic features and Renaissance detail, with Inigo Jones being the first significant classical British architect to introduce Italianate Renaissance architecture in Britain.
Get original essayThe Renaissance's late appearance in Britain could not have made a better timely arrival. It was thanks to the studies and works of Inigo Jones, an English Architect, who introduced Renaissance detail to the unforsaken gothic features. Gothic architecture was an important revival moment for British culture ever since Roman influence started to make its way out of England. The exit of Roman influence caused Britain to fall into a sense of complacent ideals in not only its culture but religious practices, and governmental integrity. It was a period they refer to as the Dark Ages. The Renaissance begins in the 14th century in Florence, Italy, inspired by the “Renaissance Man” where it promoted curiosity of various topics. People began to feel the need to question and find answers themselves. It was a fervent period where cultural, artistic, political, and economic ideals were challenged. Architecture, one of the more evidently impacted fields, was challenged by the ideologies of architects like Andrea Palladio. Palladio was the greatest 16th-century architect located in northern Italy. His projects consisted of notably Villas and Palazzos. Palladio’s distinct style was heavily swayed by his upbringing and relationships; in addition to his design focus with aspects of symmetry, & geometry that was influenced by Vitruvian rules of proportion and symmetry. These same ideas were later interpreted and introduced to Britain by Inigo Jones.
Inigo Jones is credited as being the first significant classical British Architect to introduce Italianate Renaissance architecture in Britain. This might be a misconception. Although Jones’ style is distinctively different, the architects of the Elizabethan Era before him were also influenced by a classical approach. The mansions of the Elizabethan Period portrayed various new ideals or features. External features included towers, gables, parapets, balustrades and high chimneys. Towers, referred as ‘wings’ internally, were placed on both sides of the design, hinting at the evolution from medieval fortified structures where now it is no longer necessary to fortify one’s home. Both towers and façade were then adorned with the same level of detail to maximize symmetry. Interior features include great halls and galleries acting as a Piano Nobile or main reception area and transition between spaces on all floors connecting the two ‘wings.’ Broad staircases then connect all floor levels where you meet the long galleries in which it moves you through private and public spaces. Another Elizabethan feature is the application of floor-to-ceiling windows on all floors and different spaces, a notion of “more windows than walls” was created and houses began to look outward instead of inward.
A perfect example of such detail is the Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire, designed by an architect named Robert Smythson. The Hardwick Hall was built in 1590-1597 and its one of the most significant Elizabethan country houses. The architect Robert Smythson had a very respectable interpretation of Renaissance architecture. His use of an H-shaped plan created unique experiences within. Beginning with the application of the ‘Great Hall’ in a central position, it not only provides seamless transitional effects throughout the main floor but also anchors the axis of symmetry that is used as a constant design factor reflected in its floor plan, and façade. Connections between floors are made through a Grand Staircase carved in newels and pierced balustrades. The staircase is strategically located adjacent to the long galleries on each upper floor that not only act as transitions from public to private space but are well naturally lit spaces in which the family is highlighted through different portraits and pieces of art. The idea of having such a grandeur staircase was purposely done in contrast from the inconvenient corkscrew staircases of the medieval period, something that they were more than happy to move away from.
Elizabethan Era acted as a transition between Gothic features and Renaissance detail. This is where Inigo Jones’ trip to Italy to study the works of Andrea Palladio came to his advantage. Jones’ understanding of detail and proportion clearly followed his classical precedents far more closely than the architects before him in the Elizabethan period. Jones makes his imprint in architectural history solely off his design of the Banqueting Whitehall House and of course his earliest work the Queen’s House.