the presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the syste
the presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the systematic review type peer-reviewed articles selected.
The response minimally explains the levels of evidence and the strengths of using a systematic review and/or minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.
2 to >0 pts PoorThe presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to support the presentation or is missing.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Formatting Appropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.
5 to >4.0 pts ExcellentPresentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …
Citations use correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts GoodPresentation includes 3 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …
Citations use correct APA format with few (1-2) errors.
3 to >2.0 pts FairPresentation includes 2 peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …
Citations contain several (3-4) APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts PoorPresentation includes 1 or no resources. … Citations contain many >5 APA format errors.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 to >4.0 pts ExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
4 to >3.0 pts GoodEighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
2 to >0 pts PoorLess than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting —English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar
mechanics
Solution:
