All of nature commences to whisper its secrets to me in my ear through it gushing, powerful, unexplainable sounds. Sounds that were once unclear to my soul now become the meaningful language of my nature and my culture that make me who I am.
Get original essayAs a Mexican young lady, naturally, Spanish is my first language. By the time I was four years old, I had quickly learned English through watching PBS shows constantly. Education came easy for me, partly because my parents taught me to read and write music notes and from a young age of parenthood, they would always have me read books or at least try to read them. As I grew into my academics and childhood I felt as if I were in ice mainly because my English wasn’t perfect, and at the same time, I was losing my Spanish because I wasn’t involving in it daily anymore as much at home as before.
I vividly remember being made fun one day in the third grade class as I read and said “Masachutets” instead of pronouncing it “Massachusetts” and a girl who sat in the back of the class stood up and said, “ That’s not how you say it” laughing with the rest of the class all because of my “Mexican” accent. Kids would laugh at me and point out my mistakes constantly because I could not speak Spanish or English “correctly.”. I obviously did not want the teasing to continue, so I made the decision to lose my accent and had the mentality that people would be more accepting of me if I was to do that. I soon became the girl in my third grade class who stood up to make fun of my accent, I started to avoid my culture and tried to fit in into the American culture. It was to the point where I felt ashamed and embarrassed to be Mexican. But that all changed on my 14th birthday. My mother and I were in the kitchen making my favorite food enchiladas for dinner. As I was sitting the table and calling the rest of family to come to the table my mom told me to meet her in the room after dinner because she was going to tell something very important. As soon as I finished cleaning my plate I walked into my parents’ room, there my mom was holding a piece of paper in her hands. She proceed by tell me “Erandi ven siéntate conmigo, te tengo que decirte algo muy important. ” (Erandi come sit next to me, I have to tell you something very important). As I sat down my mother showed me my birth certificate and she pointed out my place of birth and I clearly saw that I said Guadalajara, Jalisco. From that day on my mentality has changed and I hope that no one ever feels ashamed of where they come from. I am blessed to be finishing my senior year in high school, but it is now my turn to take what I have learned about my mistake and show the Mexican and Latino community that they too can overcome adversity.
Today, I help out in an adult school for those individuals who don’t know English by teaching them the basics of English. I want to redeem myself for all of the years I didn’t spend encouraging myself and those around me to pursue their dreams. Because I am fluent in Spanish, and not afraid to show it I can easily communicate with my ESL students at the adult school in Los Angeles and help them. But most importantly, I can be their model to follow and show them that if they work hard, they too can become successful individuals but they shall never forget their origins and they should proudly say Viva Mexico!
Stereotyping, gender discrimination, and oppression are still present in this society. In order to know the recent views or perspective of people towards lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) a study conducted. It was hypothesized that there will be more negative reactions than positive attitudes. A result has shown that majority of the respondents have accept and support the LGBT people and are able to become one of the ally. The findings from this LGBT acceptance essay can be used to acquire knowledge to people about societal attitudes to decrease any oppression or gender discrimination.
Get original essayThe subject of contribution in the lesbian, gay, indiscriminate, and transgender (LGBT) people group is auspicious and significant. Some of the LGBT issues have entered the national discussion. Simultaneously, research and writing have started to investigate the job of culture and personality in administration and hierarchical conduct. Specifically, the writing on the procedures of authority and activism in LGBT associations and the more extensive LGBT people group has fundamentally expanded over the previous decade. In spite of the fact that the LGBT people group has looked for value in open approach for a long time it has been uniquely in the late 1990s and the mid 21st century that the network has made extensive advances. A portion of the ongoing issues influencing the LGBT people group incorporate non-separation, residential organization advantages, and marriage rights. The Supreme Court striking down homosexuality laws in Lawrence v. Texas and the Massachusetts Supreme Court permitting same sex marriage in Massachusetts for the situation, Goodridge v. Branch of Public Health, are instances of the advances made. Be that as it may, the section of eleven state established changes characterizing marriage as between a man and lady is a case of a noteworthy difficulty during the 2004 crusade. Now in the gay rights development, there is an extreme requirement for individuals from the LGBT people group to end up included. Much political, lawful, and sociological writing has been delivered to examine these current LGBT challenges, how best to accomplish the objectives, and what the suggestions would be for the LGBT people group and society all in all if the objectives are accomplished.
LGBT is a network that faces consistent issue of being unaccepted by individuals with conventional sexual direction. Before the late-nineteenth century, the idea of having an unmistakable sexual personality did not exist, however individuals in the past led lives like our cutting edge comprehension of being LGBTQ. Gay character, as both an individual and political class, did not completely develop until the mid-twentieth century. Verifiable phrasing used to portray sexuality and sex frequently came up short on the particularity that exists today.
The British sexologist Havelock Ellis, for instance, alluded to the two individuals who we would today recognize as gay or transgender as 'sexual reverses,' which he characterized as people who show same-sex fascination and a sex introduction socially as opposed to the sex one was allocated during childbirth. The German researcher and human rights extremist Karl Ulrichs also utilized the expression 'Urning,' which he portrayed as a third sexual orientation existing among people, to allude to people whom today we may depict as gay, trans, or genderqueer. Male Urnings, in Ulrichs' plan, were 'male-bodied' individuals with the spirits of ladies, and female Urnings were 'female-bodied' individuals with the spirits of men.
The expression 'gay,' begat in 1869 by the Hungarian specialist Karoly Maria Benkert, who composed under the pen name. Kertbeny, was not in mainstream use till the mid twentieth century. Mid-twentieth-century gay activists favored the expression 'homophile' over gay, considering it to be a progressively unbiased and worthy alternative since it expelled 'sexual' while decidedly certifying same-sex fascination.
'Gay' rose as an underground term in the mid twentieth century and came into famous use during the 1960s. The term was favored by the Stonewall age, who, in spite of their antecedents, were less inclined to see being gay as disgraceful or a psychological imperfection. Post-Stonewall activists tried to express a progressively extreme position expelled from the picture of decency homophile associations looked to develop. In spite of the fact that today 'gay' ordinarily alludes to men who are pulled in to men, it was generally utilized as a wide term that included the whole of the cutting edge LGBTQ initialism. For instance, during the 1970s, activists Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson frequently discussed 'gay rights' or 'gay power' in reference to their freedom as road rulers of shading (who today we would allude to as transgender). The pair established the association STAR (Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries) as an approach to arrange destitute trans road youth. 'STAR was for the road gay individuals, the road vagrants, and anyone that required assistance around then,' Rivera said.
The expression 'lesbian' originates from the Greek island of Lesbos, related with the writer Sappho, whose enduring composing expressively portrays sensual love and fascination between ladies. Regardless of the utilization of 'gay' as an umbrella term for sex and sexual minorities, the appearance of the mid-to-late twentieth-century Women's Movement (additionally alluded to as the second flood of the U.S. women's activist development) gave gay ladies the awareness to express how their encounters contrasted from both hetero ladies, who included most of the Women's Movement, and gay men. The explanation of a particular lesbian personality was regularly required by prohibitions gay ladies looked in women's activist and gay associations. Betty Friedan, the main leader of the National Organization for Women (NOW), scandalously alluded to lesbians as 'the Lavender Menace,' proposing their essence would ruin the objectives of the association by facilitating the suspicion that all women's activists were man-detesting lesbians. Lesbians, in like manner, regularly experienced unmistakable sexism in post-Stonewall gay associations, for example, the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) and the Gay Activists Alliance (GAA).
However, until the 1990s, 'gay' was frequently utilized as a shorthand to allude to the whole range of sexual and sex minorities. This utilization moved with the ascent of cross-sexual, transgender, and strange developments, bringing forth the four-letter LGBT initialism, which was viewed as more comprehensive than extensively alluding to the network basically as 'gay.' These '90s developments, while from numerous points of view unmistakable, were associated by the regular subject of addressing and studying personality parallels, for example, gay/straight, man/lady, manly/ladylike, and sex and sexuality standards all the more comprehensively. They likewise verbalized a feeling of character that was perplexing, liquid, and evolving.
The expression 'transgender' was sent and advanced by activists, for example, Kate Bornstein, Holly Boswell, Leslie Feinberg, and Riki Wilchins, to make an alliance of people who did not fit conveniently into sex doubles, or who resisted sexual orientation standards and desires, especially following the 1993 attack and murder of trans man Brandon Teena in Humboldt, Nebraska. 'Transgender' was likewise received by people who did not relate to the prior mark 'transsexual,' because of its relationship with restorative progress over the sexual orientation paired.
The letter 'Q' was some of the time added to the initialism, on the other hand alluding to 'eccentric,' or to incorporate the individuals who were 'addressing' their sexual direction or sex character. The expression 'strange' can then again allude to a recovered personality (actually signifying 'odd' or 'curious,' the word verifiably turned into a censorious term for gays), a character that communicates an increasingly radical, activist, or fierce way to deal with personality legislative issues, or an umbrella term that envelop anybody or anything outside of sex and sexuality standards. In spite of the fact that it might be productive to allude to the LGBTQ people group as 'the strange network,' 'eccentric,' for a few, is polarizing and stays hostile or critical. In view of one's age, spot of getting to be, or involvement with homophobia, 'strange' can incite sentiments of injury and prohibition.
Since the 1990s, various forms of the initialism have multiplied as progressively nuanced approaches to comprehend and characterize individuals' lived understanding of sex and sexuality are enunciated. One extended variant of the initialism being used is LGBTQQIP2SAA, which represents: lesbian, gay, indiscriminate, transgender, strange, addressing, intersex, pansexual, two soul, abiogenetic, and partner. While this adaptation is absolutely comprehensive of the bunch ways individuals get sex and sexual personality, it isn't really proficient. It is hard to recall, not to mention say, and will perpetually bring about giving those curious about the network a phrasing exercise. While comprehensive, are extended adaptations of the initialism in reality less successful in making expanded acknowledgment and mindfulness since they are excessively muddled and clumsy? Maybe — and this is a principal question to consider.
There isn't currently, nor has there ever been, an agreement on ways to deal with activism inside the LGBTQ people group, including the governmental issues of language. LGBTQ individuals are as differing and changed as some other gathering. What joins us is a common encounter of being sex and sexual minorities, however the particularities of that experience vary from individual to individual. The fact of the matter isn't to position a few forms of the initialism as 'off-base' and others as 'right.' Rather, it is to energize basic deduction around language as a vehicle of social change, and to perceive that individuals don't need to concede to everything to work publicly. Language in a perfect world unites us, not partitions us. We ought not reject others for utilizing phrasing we may not concur with or like, or for adopting an alternate strategy. We should, be that as it may, contemplate the words we use and on the off chance that they are really filling their planned need, or making extra issues.
Issues of language are not senseless or coincidental. The demonstration of naming or naming oneself can fill in as an amazing and approving knowledge. Language gives perceivability and can move social points of view on generally trashed gatherings. Language does not simply depict our existence, however can effectively make it to improve things. What's more, language can both improve and obstruct social equity endeavors. Since the LGBTQ people group is persecuted, LGBTQ individuals will encounter mistreatment regardless of what we call ourselves. Language alone can't cure social imbalance. Most importantly, we should concentrate on completion abuse in the entirety of its horde structures.
The LGBTQ initialism isn't only an irregular gathering of letters that speak to personalities; rather, these letters are history epitomized. They recount to the account of the cutting edge LGBTQ Rights Movement, advising that their triumphs have been bound to happen, and have not been effectively won.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayThis can be concluded by what blogger Jeffry. J. Lovannone said: ”As we move up our sleeves and get ready for the fights ahead, we ought not discard or limit our history, for history can more readily illuminate our activities in the present. We ought to never be careless about the reality others battled, battled, and passed on so we could reserve the option to exist. In the event that we get rid of the letters that contain the initialism, at that point we get rid of our aggregate story — our history — too.”
As we journey through life we sometimes experience challenges and trials that are caused by other people. This is unavoidable. People hurt us for all kinds of reasons, on accident, for revenge, or sometimes they may hurt us without even realizing it. These trials can stretch us, perhaps to our very limits. I believe the only way to face these trials well is with an attitude of forgiveness.
Get original essayThere are many scriptural passages that teach the importance of forgiveness such as “Wherefore, I say unto you, that ye ought to forgive one another; for he that forgiveth not his brother his trespasses standeth condemned before the Lord; for there remaineth in him the greater sin. ” and “I, the Lord, will forgive whom I will forgive, but of you it is required to forgive all men. ” These scriptures ring true, but I have to admit there are times when forgiveness can seem out of reach. It may be an especially painful event or a repeatedly, difficult person in your life. In my experience, sometimes I’ll try and try to get through the hurt a particular person has caused me and give my best efforts to try and forgive them. But that warm feeling of forgiveness escapes me and the best I’ve been able to do is put it out of mind.
A couple of years ago I had a particularly painful experience that provided me with a new prospective on forgiving others. My wife and I had just welcomed our first child into the world, a baby boy we named Isaac. We loved our new addition to the family and enjoyed the warmth and love he brought into our lives. But for first time parents, taking care of a newborn baby was a big adjustment. I remember staying up late, rocking my son to sleep to give my exhausted wife a much-needed break and then waking up multiple times in the middle of the night to put him back to sleep after feeding him. I was also working two full-time jobs and didn’t have much time to sleep without the added stress of a crying baby. It was a difficult experience that didn’t leave my wife and I much patience for each other. We started getting into arguments and my wife packed up her things and took our son after one heated exchange.
My wife was so angry she didn’t come back. I tried everything I could to coax her back home but she refused. She eventually filed for divorce but it was months before I was able to see my son again. He was three-months-old when she left and by the time I saw him again he was eight-months-old. I didn’t get to see him grow. He didn’t recognize me once we were finally reunited. I was hurt and angry at her for stealing five months of my son’s life away from me. Even as vengeful thoughts consumed me during our divorce process, I realized I needed to forgive her. I didn’t know how I could let go of the hurt so I prayed for help to forgive her. I didn’t want to hate the mother of my child. It took time, a lot of pleading to God and the help of a new wife that I adore, but I discovered forgiveness has a healing power that gives us the strength to overcome our trials.
There came into my heart a peace through forgiveness. I experienced it. With all the storms life throws at us, I don’t think I would be able to get through this life without it. Even if the person you have forgiven continues to hurt you, you will know you have done everything you could. I’m so thankful for the miracle of forgiveness.
Hamlet begins at the open mouth of the Void. Barnardo and Francisco call out to each other and into darkness; they stand atop a guard platform that is naked to the open air and to the night. Every character's entrance is marked by a series of interrogatives, as characters already on stage try to ascertain the identity of those who are newly arrived and yet unseen. Darkness isolates these men from each other as they stand on the edge of civilization, the place where the solid stones of Elsinore castle open up into the world of night and the supernatural. The nature of the ghost remains debatable: Horatio has initially insisted that the guards' delusions have conjured the phantom (1.1.21), and, even accepting the reality of the apparition, Catholic teaching (ghosts are spirits of the dead coming up from purgatory) and Protestant doctrine (all ghostly apparitions are demons in disguise) hold divergent opinions on the nature and source of phantoms (Garber 12/15). The men have gathered together on the guard platform, which has become a kind of stage within a stage. They have come to see a visitor who is a creature of hallucination, purgatory, or hell. This ghost is coming out of the open maw of night above and around the platform; what is known clings to the battlements, and all else in existence hails from the empty, the unknown, the imagined, the demonic. When Barnardo reports to Marcellus, "I have seen nothing" (1.1.20), the word "nothing" takes on a number of meanings. He has not seen the apparition; gazing out into the dark, he has barely seen anything at all. But "seeing" is still phrased in the positive, and so "nothing" becomes something to see. It is more than absence: emptiness itself exists as an object. He has seen nothing; he is staring out into the Void.
Get original essayThe Oxford English Dictionary's list of uses and definitions of the word "nothing" is striking in that so many uses of "nothing" most emphatically mean something. Confining examination to those meanings in use in Shakespeare's time, the list remains extensive and rich: "nothing" can mean "a trifling event" (O.E.D. 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," 6a); "that which is non-existent" (5a); "not any (material or immaterial) thing" (I.); "that which is not any number, and possesses neither quantity nor value; the figure or character representing this; nought (4); a person of no note ( 6c). "Nothing" also denotes "extinction or destruction" (5b) or "the final point, stage, or state of the process of destruction" (5c). Nothing's position is paradox: it is that which does not exist, yet me must name it, invent a numeral for it, use the concept of it as the ultimate point of reference?in graphing mathematical models and equations, the coordinates (0,0) mark the starting point of all things, the center of infinity. In use, "nothing" as a concept is constitutive of the real, as what is not helps us to define what is. The word points to the open maw of dark that begins immediately at the boundary where Elsinore castle and the world end, while the borders of "nothing," in turn, help to mark the outlines of the world. Yet in Hamlet, "nothing" is constantly encroaching on the territory of something?its appearance calls attention to the inadequacies of language, the dissolution of action into inaction, the form and formlessness of madness, the void of death.
Polonius' use of the word "nothing" illustrates how "nothing" can be constitutive of concepts and ideas; rhetorically, the word here seems closest to "not any (material or immaterial) thing" (O.E.D. 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," I.), and in this function it is used as an emphatic reference point. "My liege, madam, to expostulate . . . Why day is day, night night, and time is time, / Were nothing but to waste night, day, and time" (2.2.87-90). "Were nothing but" is a phrase of being: it means, essentially, what is. "But" separates the real qualities of the act from what it is not. To expostulate the why of time is "nothing but" to waste time; the act has no significance or effect other than its waste. The phrase "nothing but" has been used to isolate the effect of waste as the solitary consequence of a philosophical discussion of time. Here, the boundaries between nothing and something are clear: we can know, according to Polonius, what an act means, and what it does not. Indeed, Polonius shows that thanks to the isolating powers of the word "nothing," an act can mean exactly one thing. In Polonius' world, all is simple, as day is day, night is night and time is time; no barrier exists between perception and reality, concept and object. He uses "nothing" in a similar way just a few lines later: "?Mad,' call I it, for to define true madness, / What is't but to be nothing else but mad? / But let that go" (2.2. 94-6). Here, Polonius uses "nothing" to insist on the purity of categories and the transparency of things. "Nothing" here carries the ring of obviousness, of transparency: madness is nothing but the state of being mad. The word fits the thing; a thing is what it is and its boundaries are marked unambiguously by what it is not. According to Polonius, definitions not only point clearly, via the word "nothing," to states of being?they are those states of being. He insists on purity: his definition is not merely of madness but of "true madness," maintaining the boundaries between a pure "mad" and not-mad. When Polonius speaks, he puts forward a world view where cause and effect remain distinct, where brevity is one thing and tediousness another, where categories are pure and contained in impenetrable conceptual boundaries. To describe a thing, one need only say it is that and nothing but that. But "nothing" is already making trouble: Polonius' sentences tend to invert on themselves, reducing his statements to meaninglessness. "That we find out the cause of this effect? / Or rather say ?the cause of this defect,' / For this effect defective comes by cause" and "Thus it remains and the remainder thus" (2.2.102-105) are two outstanding examples of the hollowness of his sentences and reasoning. His use of "nothing" means that his definitions are ultimately circular and unstable.
While Polonius uses "nothing" to show the transparency of categories and the knowable qualities of things, Hamlet says "nothing" in the same scene and refers to the inadequacies of language and himself, and the permeability of the barriers between categories. His use of the word destabilizes the boundary between what exists and what does not, between "nothing" and reality. Referring to a player's ability to counterfeit grief, Hamlet cries out in amazement that the actor was able to create such feeling out of nothing:
A broken voice, and his whole function suiting
With forms to his conceit? And all for nothing.
For Hecuba!
What's Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba,
That he should weep for her? What would he do
Had he the motive and the cue for passion
That I have? (2.2.533-9)
"Nothing" here seems to denote comparative insignificance or unimportance (O.E.D, 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," 3a). Hecuba, as a person, has had no intimate contact with the actor. "Nothing," in this case, is a starting point, a catalyst for the imagination and art of the player. But the word "nothing" is meant to downplay Hecuba's significance, reminding us that she is a character, a bit of fiction and unreality. Here, Hamlet becomes self-referential theatre, as an actor playing a fictional character asks what another character (an actor playing an actor playing a character) would do if he were in the first character's place. This moment of self-referentiality turns Hamlet into a strange bridge between fiction and real man, between character and audience: by speaking of his own position in terms of motive and cue, he brings himself down to the level of Hecuba; he is a character, "nothing." But perceiving his words on a different layer, the audience sees a real man dismayed by his own life's inability to live up to the models provided by art. Transformations occur in multiple directions: Hamlet, by comparing his real self to the player and finding himself wanting, distances himself from "nothing," from the insubstantiality of fiction and unreality. At the same time he calls attention to the artifice of theatre and his own status as a fictional character, but by proclaiming that his own life does not fit with set artistic formulas Hamlet aligns himself with the audience.
Hamlet next denounces the inadequacy of his own words: " . . . Yet I, / A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak / Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my cause, / And can say nothing?no, not for a king. . ." (2.2.543-546). And yet, in loudly denouncing his own lack of speech, Hamlet is saying something. He does mourn for his father with words; he certainly has not said "nothing." Contradicting himself just a few lines later, Hamlet denounces his own excess of speech: "Ay, sure, this is most brave, / That I, the son of the dear murdered, / Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell, / Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words / And fall a-cursing like a very drab . . ." (2.2.560-4). He begins by saying that he can say nothing, and then he denounces the inadequacy of language itself. Action, in this case, is a necessary part of his filial duty. To talk is nothing; language is nothing. Strangely, Hamlet compares himself to a whore, an occupation not known for its reliance on language. The use of "whore" here seems to emphasize the cheapness of words (whores have a "nothing" quality in the sense that they are considered insignificant people (3a), and in seeking revenge their only recourse is cursing), but Hamlet has used the most carnal and bodily of occupations in his simile. The whole soliloquy deals very muddily with the "nothing" of fiction, imagination, and abstraction becoming real, concrete, and carnal, while Hamlet himself is paralyzed, paradoxically, by wordlessness and by too many words, by inaction. Appropriately, he resolves at the end of the soliloquy to use a play to unveil Claudius. In the same speech, Hamlet has first called a fictional character "nothing" of significance and then resolved to use art as a strategic weapon against his father's murderer. No wonder that Hamlet cannot make Polonius' confident distinctions between real and unreal, art and life. Throughout the soliloquy, categories are always destabilizing and blurring with their supposed opposites.
Ophelia's relationship to the word "nothing" is particularly painful. The girl tells Hamlet that her own thoughts are neutral or insignificant. When Hamlet asks Ophelia what she thinks, she replies "I think nothing, my lord" (3.2.106). Later, "nothing" will be used once again to describe her mental state, as she thinks nothing that is fully intelligible to others. Here, "nothing" also refers to the female genitals (Norton, p. 1710), with the vagina linked to the figure 0. "Thing," slang for the penis, also reminds the audience of the etymology of "nothing" (Norton, p.1710), providing a series of obscene jokes: nothing, no thing, nothing. In this series of randy puns, having no thing means you have nothing, i.e. having no penis means you have a vagina. Hamlet's bawdy assertion that "no thing" is "a fair thought to lie between a woman's legs" (3.2.107-9) shows again the ways that "nothing" is used in a constitutive function. Woman, as a category, is formed here in terms of what she does not have. Ophelia is not an active participant in this punning; instead, she is the half-aware butt of Hamlet's dirty jokes. "Nothing" is what lies between her legs, "nothing" is what lies between her ears ("I think nothing"), and "nothing," in the sense of an unimportant or powerless person, is what she is. She will become the victim of Elsinore's intrigues, lacking Hamlet's phallus and consequently Hamlet's potential ability to protect himself. The obscene puns return when Gertrude describes Ophelia's death: when she drowns, the girl is bedecked in a garland of flowers that shepherds have named after male genitals (5.1.141, Norton 1740). "Nothing," in this earlier passage with Hamlet, foreshadows Ophelia's doom. After Ophelia goes mad, her words reflects her basic powerlessness: Horatio informs the queen that "Her [Ophelia's] speech is nothing" (4.5.7). Horatio, trained in philosophy and in the categorizations of Renaissance thinking, relegates her ramblings to the realm of nonsense. In that they are not coherent or cohesive statements, they become "nothing," comparatively worthless or insignificant (O.E.D. 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," 6a), possibly with an additional meaning of "nothing" in that they represent the final stages of dissolution (5c) as Ophelia's mind completely deteriorates. And yet here Ophelia's words and gestures finally strike near some of the events at Elsinore: to Gertrude, she hands fennel and columbine, symbols of flattery and marital infidelity (4.5.177). Responding to her ramblings, Laertes remarks, "This nothing's more than matter." (4.5.172). "Nothing" here suggests that Ophelia no longer plays by the rules of how and what to communicate in civilized society and Elsinore. Speaking nonsense frees her to speak a version of truth, though without much significant effect on events.
"Nothing" and its meanings play themselves out heavily when Hamlet's father appears to Hamlet again in Gertrude's bedchamber:
QUEEN GERTRUDE: To whom do you speak thus?
HAMLET: Do you see nothing there?
QUEEN GERTRUDE: Nothing at all, yet all that is I see.
HAMLET: Nor do you nothing hear?
QUEEN GERTRUDE: No, nothing but ourselves.
HAMLET: Why, look you here. Look how it steals away.
My father, in his habit as he lived.
Look where he goes even now out at the portal.
Exit GHOST (3.4.122-7)
The ghost has appeared again, but this time only Hamlet sees him. The ghost's origin must once again be questioned: delusion? purgatory? hell? Are both ghosts "nothing"?without any material or immaterial substance? Is the first ghost "real" and the second ghost, as Gertrude insists, "nothing?" Both possibilities leave many unanswered (and unanswerable) questions. Gertrude's claim seems almost too sure, as if she is trying to convince herself: "[I see] Nothing at all, yet all that is I see." In this play, with Elsinore's shadowy halls and intrigues, the Queen's claim that she sees "all that is" is patently ridiculous. "Nothing" has appeared here in four consecutive lines. Even if the room is empty of a "real" ghost, Gertrude's claim to see nothing does not stand in her favor?one basic example of a "nothing" she fails to perceive is the very real absence of her first husband. The emptiness of her own marriage bed, so rapidly filled, is the "nothing" she most definitely has not seen and does not permit herself to see. Hamlet's father has become a "nothing," a nobody, a person of no note (O.E.D. 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," 6c), quickly forgotten by his wife and avenged with maddening slowness by his son. He is also "nothing" in that he is nowhere, gone into the void of death; he is of the "nothing" that denotes "extinction and destruction" (O.E.D. 2nd edition, s.v. "nothing," 5b). He appears out of nothing when he comes to Gertrude's bedchamber, and he retreats to it when he walks back out through the portal, whatever or wherever "it" may be. We are returned to the first scene, where the battle tower stands surrounded by darkness. This time, it is Gertrude's bedchamber standing in a known center, and Elsinore's dark halls form the surrounding world of the unknown, of ghosts, of nothingness from which phantoms appear and.to which they return. In asking if she sees something, Hamlet is also asking his mother to verify his sanity, but her answer, hinged on so slippery a word, provides no certainties for him. Hamlet asks his mother if she truly sees "nothing," but "nothing" in the play stands as the locus for a whole set of slippages into intellectual chaos, powerlessness, infidelity, forgotten husbands and fathers, madness, the unknown, and death.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayThroughout Hamlet, "nothing" is a real presence, a force or concept constantly shaping and destabilizing categories, relationships, and events. The play's most famous moments deal with a nothing that is the absence of what is known: as Hamlet asks what it would be not to be, the ultimate opaqueness of death is fearsome enough to make him go on living. It is too much for the prince to stare Nothing in the face. Later, in the play's most famous tableau, Hamlet literally stares at an embodiment of Nothing as he holds Yorick's skull. The skull's eye sockets are without subjectivity, empty of their tenant organs and the mind that saw through them; they contain, in a word, "nothing." But from their hollows something maddeningly elusive stares back: simultaneously a presence and an absence, as haunting as Hamlet's own dead father, and opaque as the darkness that envelopes Elsinore. Part of the play's power is in this substantive "nothing," a portal of slippage that relentlessly destabilizes what is known and what is knowable.
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou is incredibly unapologetic. From her early childhood to her late teens, Maya already confronted many challenges in her life. These early challenges included moving away from her parents, undergoing self-hate, confronting racism in the south, surviving rape as a youth, and lastly, developing her love for literature. Throughout the novel, you see Maya transforms into one newly developed human being after another.
Get original essayIn the prologue, Maya is reciting a poem to herself for church and forgets it immediately. For church, she imagines herself wearing a “lavender, taffeta dress.” With this image, she visions herself as a “movie star” and how that contributes to her dream of being a white girl. She states, “Wouldn’t they be surprised when one day I woke out of my black ugly dream, and my real hair, which was long and blond”. She refers to herself as a nuisance to her race, wishing that she was white and saying that she was cursed by a fairy godmother as if this was a fairytale that gone wrong. Afterwards, she trips on the way to the bathroom and pees on herself. This brings great embarrassment to her, adding yet another event to her unfortunate tales of being a southern black girl. Maya was only three years old when she and her brother, Bailey, were sent off to live with their Grandma Annie also known as “Momma” and their Uncle Willie in Stamps, Arkansas. Their parents were newly divorced and this decision made it much easier for the children to live in an environment that was not so broken. Furthermore, their parents sent them there to live in a rural community that could be more fitting for them. However, life in Stamps is not easy for them at all. They witness a many quite sickening incidents that were considered reasonable in the time and place: 1930’s America in the South. For example, Maya and Bailey witness a sheriff talking to Momma. The sheriff warns Momma that she better hide Uncle Willie, since there is suspicion all over town regarding a black man having an intimate relationship with a white woman. The Ku Klux Klan may be coming tonight, so she must hide him very well: “Annie, tell Willie he better lay low tonight. A crazy nigger messes with a white lady today. Some of the boys’ll be coming over later”. Now, this must be traumatizing for Maya and Bailey to watch; just because of their Uncle’s skin color and the “threat” he poses, he could have a good chance of being killed. This moment definitely led Maya to think of Stamps in a whole new different way.
Maya’s time growing up in the South ultimately caused a lot of self-hatred within her. The South is largely known for being conservative and racist, and Maya faced that reality significantly as a child. For example, in Chapter Five, she describes how a few white girls would come into the store to torment Momma and be rowdy and rude. Maya disliked the treatment of black people that she saw throughout Stamps. Stamps really wasn’t the right place for her at all. On the bright side, Maya and her brother did receive a good education from their uncle and Maya fell in love with reading when she read William Shakespeare for the first time. The siblings’ father, Bailey Johnson, re-enters their lives with a bang. He decides to take them to California. Maya and Bailey are so happy to move out of Stamps and astounded that Bailey is their dad since he is tall, sturdy, and has his life together. Instead of bringing them to California he leaves them with their mom in St. Louis. Even with their mother’s good looks, Maya still can’t believe how attractive she was compared to herself. “I was dumbstruck. I knew immediately why she had sent me away. She was too beautiful to have children. I had never seen a woman as pretty as she who was called ‘Mother’”. Maya’s time in St. Louis is drastically better than life in Stamps. St. Louis is more diverse and embracing of her. Maya and Bailey live with their grandparents before moving in with their mother. Maya has a little boost of self- confidence and definitely matures as a result of being one of the smartest students in her class. Most importantly, Maya’s relationship with books grows deeper; she reads a lot and gained knowledge. For a while, Maya and Bailey move in with their mom, Vivian and her boyfriend, Mr. Freeman. St. Louis starts to feel more like a deserted place. Everything starts turning around when she lives in their house. Maya’s relationship with Mr. Freeman worsens. One day, when her mom is gone, she wakes up to find Mr. Freeman holding her inappropriately. Maya doesn’t know how to react at all, having never felt this type of way before. She feels pleasure, but at the same is confused as to if this was right. Not realizing that she was being raped at all, she felt like it was all her fault because Mr. Freeman would not come into contact with her after that. Not long after, it would happen again: “For months he stopped speaking to me again. I was hurt and for a time felt lonelier than ever. But then I forget about him, and even the memory of his holding me precious melted into the general darkness just beyond the great blinkers of childhood”. This moment is where the rising action officially begins.
This time with Mr. Freeman’s actions, Maya realizes that she’s being violated inappropriately: “ I hesitated for two reasons: he was holding me too tight to move, and I was sure that any minute my mother or Bailey or the Green Hornet would bust in the door and save me”. She continues, “Then there was the pain. A breaking and entering when even the senses are torn apart. The act of tape on an eight-year-old body is a matter of the needle giving because the camel can’t. The child gives, because the body can, and the mind of the violator cannot”. This incident in Maya’s early stages of her life is where she starts to understand herself and how she is placed in this world. Maya wants to tell someone the incident between her and Mr. Freeman, but she can’t because he threatens that if she tells anyone he’ll kill her brother. Maya, having great admiration for her brother, does not want to put him in any danger, but he still encourages her to tell the truth. After this incident, Mr. Freeman is arrested. Maya spoke against him, having a platform for focusing on she vocalizes her opinion. He is convicted, but is sentenced for just a year in jail. Surprisingly, he gets an early release, but is murdered by someone kicking him to death. Shortly after his death, Maya gets herself into a deep depression because she believes that her interactions with him lead to his death. She stops talking, sinking into a depressed state. She even stops thinking clearly, thinking that there is something wrong with her: “Just my breath, carrying my words out, might poison people and they’d curl up and die like the black fat slugs that only pretended. I had to stop talking”. Unfortunately, she moves back to Stamps to restart her life again, and her brother is not in a good place emotionally as well.
Coping with her depression, Maya mopes around for a long period of time, until she meets her true companion, Ms. Bertha Flowers. Bertha Flowers is an old woman who isn’t quite like anyone else in town at all. She’s quite unique, like an educated renaissance woman, and she reads English novels. Bertha helps Maya a lot with her self-esteem and helps fuel her interest in reading and literature. Bertha really believes in Maya and wants the best for her, offering her much encouragement: “She said she was going to give me some books and that I not only must read them, I must read them aloud. She suggested that I try to make a sentence sound in as many different ways as possible”. Maya adds, “All I cared about was that she made tea cookies for me and read to me from her favorite book.”
Pretty odd events happen to Maya when she is in her early teenage years. She becomes maid, only to help finish her schooling. She works for Mrs. Viola Cullinan, a rich white woman who doesn’t have the best personality. She keeps calling Maya “Mary” which causes the gig not to work out so well. Additionally, she and the family lost Bailey for a few weeks. Eventually, things start to bright up for Maya in her time in Stamps: she makes a friend at last. Her name is Louise. Maya and Louise share secrets together and truly held a favorable friendship.
Maya, now approaches graduation, only eighth grade graduation, but it's a big deal. The ceremony had its ups and downs, but in the end. Maya ended it with her own self-note, you could shape her as a person once she gets older. Shee praises black poets and black people as a whole, how we changed the spectrum of ourselves from learning from one of other through literature. This shows Maya being more proud of her blackness completely, especially recognizing it at a young age.
Maya moves back to Los Angeles. She is extremely happy that she is in sunny California and back with her mom. She’s doesn’t want any incident like last time to get in her way of her being united with her mom. While living with Vivian, it was quite chaotic like last time. She got heavily involved with partying and violence, as well got married. His name is Daddy Clidell and he’s the first father figure Maya has ever looked up to. He treated her like not even her biological father bothered to. “Unexpectedly, I resembled him, and when he, Mother and I, walked down the street his friends often said, “Clidell that’s sure your daughter. Ain’t no way you can deny her.”
She moves to San Francisco and accepts a scholarship to a rich predominately white school called the California Labor School. She did experience racism once again, one of the only three black students at school. During her time there she was fully supported by Miss Kirwin, who taught her she shouldn’t be ashamed of the color of her skin in whatever environment she’s in. Shortly after, Maya is invited by her father, Daddy Bailey to spend some time with him in Southern California. She is introduced to his girlfriend, Dolores, who doesn’t like her at all. She goes on a trip with them to Mexico and it ends up in a whole fiasco. Once they got back the relationship between all three worsen. Dolores and Daddy Bailey began to argue, and Dolores ends up insulting Vivian, Maya’s mother. Maya reacted to slapping her and Dolores attacked her.
Maya is injured, she feel like she might die. After that traumatic night, she decides to run away and become homeless. This is where the climax happens. She is now living independently, sadly homeless for a long period of time. With that comes a great outcome, Maya starts to feel more confident and being exposed to the great diversity around her. “There was so much curiosity evident in their features that I knew they wouldn’t just go away before they knew who I was, so I opened the door, prepared to give them any story (even the truth) that would buy my peace.”
Maya ends up going back to living with her mother, Vivian and she does not question a thing. Since her life is back to being basic, she decides to look for a job. She is committed to becoming a train conductorette and nothing was going to stop her at all. Finally, she lives the dream of a lifetime becoming the first black woman to be a conductorette in all of San Francisco. “I would have the job. I would be a conductorette and sling a full money changer from my belt. I would.” She goes back to school, but still faces the same prejudice and sexism from her classmates forcing her to skip classes and having no motivation to learn.
During this time in Maya’s life, she’s in her late teens discovering her sexuality. She feels as if she’s lesbian due to the late puberty growth of her body. She couldn’t imagine being a lesbian, so solving that she decides to finds a boyfriend. She makes the plan to have sexual intercourse with a guy from her neighborhood and it was a success. Unfortunately, for her young self she finds out she is pregnant. Maya hides the pregnancy for months, until the end of the year when she graduates high school. She left with only a note to her parents who were okay with the whole thing. Maya gives birth to a baby boy now is involved in the next chapter of her life, adulthood. At the end, she cuddles with her child in a gentle quiet manner falling asleep together.
The theme behind I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings is identity. Maya undergoes a lot of change from start to finish, ranging from good to bad to right back to good. Maya struggles with her appearance (Black identity and how it affects her living in than Modern America) and her rape as a child (how it stuck with her and how she could never get over it, even when it comes to her interest in sex/sexuality). Maya is like any other human being, even if she went through traumatic events in such a short period of time, she didn’t know who she was at one point. What is the meaning of Maya Angelou? What’s her purpose it confused her to question herself on the daily.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayI Know Why the Caged Bird Sings has caused great impact to African-American Literature and how it relentlessly shows the struggle of black women in marginalized community. The book presents like any human goes through, women of color go through too. Caged Bird greatly influenced Maya’s colleagues such as, James Baldwin and Oprah Winfrey. Even influencing pop culture as well, Alicia Keys released a song called “Caged Bird” off her 2001 album Songs in A Minor. Keys stayed true to the essence of Angelou’s theme. I would gratefully recommend this book to anyone my own age wanting to learn more the issues of race, identity, and trauma.
I prefer to be true to myself, even at the endangerment of finding the ridicule of others, rather than to be false and finding my own detestationWhile the idea behind this statement is admirable, the language used to express it is overly dramatic and confusing. Instead, the writer could rephrase it as, "I value being true to myself over conforming to societal expectations, even if it means being ridiculed by others.". Why should I worry about what others think of meThe sentence is a common rhetorical question. However, the use of the phrase "I don't give a shit" is unnecessarily vulgar and unprofessional. Instead, the writer could use a more diplomatic language, such as "I am not concerned about others' opinions of me."
? I don’t give a shit about how others perceive my personality because, to begin with, I know myself and I also know my own demons - which, at the outset, are just conventional behaviors of an ordinary human being. As an individual, at all times, I think of my own benefits and gains - doing things for my own advancement and bettermentThe sentence is grammatically correct, but the writer could improve it by using more concise language, such as "I prioritize my personal growth and development."
. And at the time, I am self-seeking and egocentric. What is your true self? In my essay I'm going to answer this question.
I only care for myselfThis statement sounds selfish and lacks nuance. The writer could rephrase it as, "While I prioritize my own needs, I also strive to be considerate of others.". The more introverted, the more ignored: and the more unsustained I am, the more I will value myself. I make mistake. I am who I am. Nevertheless, I believe that I am good and I also believe that I am capable of being better. I don’t want everyone to like me- I should think less of myself if some people didThe phrase is self-deprecating and sends the wrong message. Instead, the writer could say, "I do not seek validation from others and am comfortable with who I am."
. Everything that happens to me is a reflection of what I believe about myselfThe sentence is an overgeneralization and lacks context. Instead, the writer could say, "My self-perception influences how I interpret events in my life."
. for me, there is no actual rule in this word but only personal norms of how we limit ourselves. I don’t have any terrific self-esteem issues but I do sometimes comprehend that I’ve been too lucky in my life and that I’m over-praised by some people at the rarest of moments. I respect myself, and I only respect those people who respect themselves.
For me, self-awareness is having a clear perception of your personality, including your thoughts, beliefs, motivation, and emotions- it allows me to understand other people, how they perceive me, my attitude, and my responses to them at the moment. I could say that I am aware of my own weaknesses and strengths. I know my own capacities- my potentials and assets that make me stand out from others. I also know my disadvantages - my negativities that make up my flaws and weak spots. Evidently, as a person, I also have the inclination not to distinguish my own traits and behaviorsThe sentence is confusing and unclear. The writer could rephrase it as, "Sometimes, I struggle to recognize my own strengths and weaknesses.". My friends tell me that I have this inadequate attitude of not caring or not being aware of the occurrences in my surroundingsThe sentence is awkwardly worded. The writer could say, "My friends have pointed out that I sometimes appear indifferent to my surroundings."
. I have the tendency not to care too much about the things happening within my environment. However, I am managing to let loose of my hidden self and mend my self-disclosure facility. My self-awareness is quite high because I always ask people around me about their perception of me and how they see me as a friend or companionThe sentence is a good example of seeking feedback. However, the writer could add that they also engage in self-reflection to enhance their self-awareness.
.
I am free-spoken to myselfThe phrase "free-spoken" is not a standard usage in English. Instead, the writer could say, "I am honest with myself.". I accept criticisms. I believe that accepting criticisms could actually develop my personality - that to any further extent, it would build up my personal appeal and would make me a better person. Having a clear understanding of my thought and behavior patterns would help me understand other people as well. All of my life, I want to be so brave to say and do what I want. I have heard people say that self-esteem is very important to my interpersonal communication and I must have high confidence or self-esteemThe sentence is a bit confusing. The writer could say, "I recognize that having self-esteem can improve my communication skills."
.
I don’t really have a high sense of worth. I just do things for a purpose, for intention. My self-esteem depends on situations. If I am prepared enough to do a particular task, my self-esteem is imminent. If I am not, then my self-esteem is low. But since I was a kid, I’ve developed skills in facing different kinds of people. I believe I am important and I believe that the word is better because I am in it. I have confidence in myself and my abilities, and that I am able to ask for help. I trust my decisions and at times, I believe that I am my own best resource. I feel confident about my appearance and abilitiesThe sentence is a positive statement. However, the writer could add that they do not base their self-worth solely on their appearance and abilities.. From that, I form a good self-image about myself.
Self-awareness is something so crucial which an individual can’t live or survive and without itWhile the content of this paragraph is relevant, the writer could benefit from providing specific examples or anecdotes to support their argument., a person will become incompetent, impassionate, weak, and overall is not in control of oneself. It is extremely vital in a career, especially for leaders, since they should be able to decide immediately, they should not hesitate or doubt their decisions, and they must think objectively for the betterment of their members.
Knowing what I really am, what I like and dislike, and what I excel at or not helps me see the clearer picture as to where I want to end up in my career. It is especially challenging if I won’t be in an environment that I personally enjoy or prefer. Self-awareness can help me in my future career by determining what’s best for my physical, emotional, and mental wellbeing so that I can settle at my future job with ease and with no regrets. It is essential to become self-aware since not understanding and seeing what’s inside you could cause complications, such as existential or identity crisis, having a complex personality, and overall not being certain about the choices for yourself, the people around you, and especially your future career.
My easiest and personal way of cultivating self-awareness, firstly, is to take down notes on the simplest things about myself- i.e., what food do I like? what are my pet peeves? what are my favorite songs? how can I focus on studying? and so much more. Secondly, find or make time for leisure or recreational activities since I didn’t have any talents growing up, I delve into some activities or hobbies to spare time and simply relax by enjoying these pastimes such as, calligraphy, graphic design, painting, playing video games, reading books, watching movies and etc. Lastly, is to talk to someone you are close to and comfortable to vent or rant about what is inside your head because bottling up one’s emotions can lead to mental illnesses and it would be difficult to overcome once it already has started so, therefore, talking to someone and sharing your feelings can make you stay sane and feel that you are not alone battling and tormented by life’s hindrances and obstacles because everyone has their own struggles and understanding and knowing what they are also going through makes you empathize someone’s life.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayIn conclusion upon what I’ve read and understood is that you shouldn’t question your worth, your capability in performing something because maybe, it isn’t just for you. Don’t blame yourself for not becoming what you want, you are just in the wrong place and you won’t develop your character and become self-aware if you are in the wrong environment. Just like what the article said, “Self-awareness isn’t one truth. It’s a delicate balance of two distinct, even competing, viewpoints”, you can’t always blame yourself for everything because sometimes what is around you can be the cause or solution to the problem, it isn’t always about yourself. One should start asking themselves “what” instead of “why” to understand and learn who they really are and what can we acquire more about ourselves.
"But you knowed he was running for his freedom, and you could a paddled ashore and told somebody" (Twain 95). As is epitomized by the preceding quote, in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain one of the central conflicts is that of the character of Huck's battle with his conscience in regard to the question of slavery. Throughout the novel the author slowly changes Huck's mind about the ethics of slavery by introducing him into situations where black people are taken out of their stereotypical roles. To a great extent, Huck's revelations about slavery are due to his friendship with Jim, a runaway slave who used to belong to Miss Watson, the Widow Douglas' sister. As a young boy, Huck does not have all the prejudices of the older members of the Southern community, yet he does know that aiding a runaway slave is legally wrong. Thus, it is a pivotal moment indeed when Huck first discovers Jim on Jackson Island, as his decision to "spare" Jim drastically changes the direction in which the novel is proceeding and sets the stage for much of Huck's maturation and development as a character.
Get original essayAfter having staged his own death Huck goes to Jackson Island to lie low for a while. When he stumbles upon a smoking campfire he is afraid, but the next day he goes to find out whom his mysterious neighbor is, and encounters Jim. Admitting to be a runaway after having been reassured that Huck was not a ghost, Jim recounts the tale of how he had to flee to escape being sold down South by Miss Watson. It is at this point when the reader first sees Jim as more of a three-dimensional character, rather than the big black buck who thought he had been ridden around the world by witches when Tom Sawyer played a prank on him. This is because one can empathize with the fact that Jim does not want to split his family up, although at the same time he take pride in the fact that he is worth $800.
Upon his discovery of Jim, Huck is immediately faced with the responsibility of protecting Jim. As he is a runaway himself, it could be argued that Huck could not turn Jim in without risk of exposing himself. However, it is more logical to argue that the main reason Huck "spares" Jim when he first comes across him is that he hungers for human companionship. Throughout the first few chapters the reader's impression of Huck is as an extremely self-reliant character. Yet, he often complains that he is "lonesome," as well a young boy left to his own devices would be. Jim is a part of his old, safe home with the Widow Douglas, one that Huck can bring with him as he embarks upon his adventures. Although Jim is extremely superstitious and illogical, he also has some practical skills. For example, when Jim sees some young birds flying strangely he warns that there will be rain, and lo and behold, a torrential downpour which would have soaked them to the skin if they had not taken shelter in a cave arrives. In this way Jim starts to become somewhat of a father figure; definitely a better father for Huck than that embodied by Pap.
The strength of character that allows Huck to harbor Jim is tested continually during the course of their travels. At first Huck acts as master and Jim as servant in their relationship, as they have apparently continued their societal roles even in isolation from society. This probably makes Huck feel important, as he has never had a slave of his own. At this juncture in the novel Huck is not yet willing to make big sacrifices for Jim as is shown later on in the Walter Scott incident as well as when they are lost in the fog. As the story progresses though, Jim and Huck face many conflicts together and so the gap between them grows narrower. However, even as friends, it is clear that Huck's relationship with Jim is very different from the one he has with Tom Sawyer. While Tom is a playmate and Huck allows himself to become a follower and to participate in wild fantasies, Jim is a person who will actually take care of him. Jim's steadfast loyalty to Huck at first could be interpreted as mainly for protection, but in the end a bond of love has grown between them. This bond is what convinces Huck to say, "all right, I'll go to Hell," when he tears up the letter that he has written to Miss Watson. Thus, as a result of his first decision to make a companion of Jim in chapter seven, a paradigm shift of moral values from what society deems is correct to what Huck in his heart knows is the right path has been effected.
‘‘I Want a Wife’’ written by Judy Brady, in 1971, after the Women’s Rights Movement began in the USA, is an important feminist statement that makes readers think and question the place of women in society. Brady tries to emphasize that women are not seen as equal to men and there are always invisible barriers (glass ceiling) around women in society by turning the topic into a satire and criticizing gender stereotypes. Brady empowers women to understand that in order to create equality and break the glass ceiling, perspectives should be changed and one should understand that being a woman should not only be limited to do domestic duties.
Get original essayOn 26th August 1970, New York City’s Fifth Avenue was blocked during a rush hour by 50,000 feminists who paraded down with linked arms to celebrate the 50th anniversary of American women’s suffrage and 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote in the USA. On the same day, Syfers’ article, ‘I Want a Wife’ was delivered as part of a rally in San Francisco with the same aim of the parade in Fifth Avenue.
The 1960s-1980s feminist movement, also known as second-wave feminism, inspired Syfers, since this movement was mostly tackling issues of discrimination and inequality and aiming to raise awareness for women’s rights. This feminist movement started as a response to barriers against women’s life after the Second World War since ‘‘baby-boomers’’ who born after the war seriously changed the place of women in American society by classifying women as mothers mostly. Syfers rephrased this understanding with the following sentence ‘‘I belong to that classification of people known as wives.
I am a wife and not altogether, incidentally, I am a mother.’’ Syfers starts her article with this sentence, as she wanted to create a common understanding between herself and her audience and to make herself approachable as a writer who had similar disappointments and experiences with her audience on the topic of marriage and its inevitable inequalities. Using repetitions and aposiopesis (unfinished sentences) made her arguments stronger and showed her audience how tired she felt about being in the background of her marriage. Through these links and following paragraphs, Syfers tried to reach to her audience to ask ‘’why?’’ and lead them to find the core problem in their lives.
Syfers, in her article ‘’I Want a Wife’’, satirizes the views of the American society about the position of women and demonstrates a significant problem called ‘gender inequality’, which is more evident in marriages since women and men are not trained to do same tasks and not expected to take same responsibilities. She explains that the American society accepts that a woman has a number of duties that should be solely done by a woman as a mother and/or a wife whilst the same society does not oblige men to do these duties as a father and/or husband.
A wife is expected to arrange her husband’s and her life, to take care of their children, to take the children to the school and the park, to help them with their homework, to cook, to wash clothes, to keep the house and dishes clean. Moreover, as a wife is also expected to be responsible for being sensitive to her husband’s sexual needs and being able to satisfy and meet her husband’s needs whenever her husband wants as Pavlik says ‘‘Men are achievers because of the compliant slavery of their wives...’’. She should not clutter up her husband’s life with jealousies and she must be careful about birth control, if her husband does not want more children. Men do not care about these and they are usually disrespectful and neglectful.
In this regards, Syfers gives an example from her own life in her article through speaking about one of her male friends who had divorced recently and has been looking for a new wife since then. As he is free from his parental and housewife obligations, it is not a problem for this male friend to look for a new wife and leave his child with his ex-wife therefore Syfers sarcastically says that ‘‘I, too, would like to have a wife’’. Considering all these tasks and responsibilities left on women’s shoulder, she repeats her wishes with following statement ‘my God, who would not want a wife’?
Syfers’ article and the second wave feminism lead a change in the role of women in American society while helping women to break both visible and invisible barriers around them. As their lives began to change with the impact of this article and the movement, American women were empowered to become more conscious about their rights. They established significant organisations such as National Organisation for Woman (NOW) and they were gathered in ‘‘Women’s Liberation Groups’’ and ‘‘Consciousness-Raising Groups’’ which eventually allow them to march together and protest in the streets of the United States of America.
These gave them their opportunity to make sure that their voices are heard in public through word of mouth, speeches, journals et cetera. Through these reaching outs, women were able to achieve major achievements in which they were deprived from. Such rights include being able to access jobs in several areas including politics and business, and influencing changes in law such as the Equal Pay Act.
It is clear that women’s place in America has changed over the last decades. With the impact of Syfer’s article and second feminist movement, women have more rights today than they had in the past. Today women have chances to study and work as they are not just seen as housewives. Due to increasing number of single mothers, women are now considered as ‘‘breadwinners’’ of their families as statistics shows that nearly half of the workers in the United States of America are women.
Despite all the achievements of feminist movement and Syfer’s efforts, gender inequality in the United States remains, maybe not as much as 1970s and how Syfers satire but still remains. For instance, for the same job title and workload, Equal Pay Act indicates that women and men shall earn same amount of money whereas in reality women workers are earning less money than men workers are earning. Another example is that women should make progress in politics, however only 25 percent of all national parliamentarians are women.
To put it briefly, Syfers’ article, inspired by the second wave feminism, affected feminist literature via further elaborating the glass ceiling in front of female emancipation and showing how it could only be lifted if women can see their true power and act accordingly. ‘I Want a Wife’ is a satiric way to explain how women can do and achieve anything and yet how part of the American men is still not willing to accept this. Syfers’ essay is an important literary work that reflects the understanding of its era and should be further studied to understand present day.
“Regardless of what we might think of our gender, we can only live that gender through the body we have.”
Get original essay
Throughout Sharon Pollock’s play Blood Relations, the plotline focuses on the life of Lizzie Borden and her day-to-day experience as a woman who does not conform to feminine expectations. The play is set in the late nineteenth century, a time when women were viewed as a subordinate group within society. The bodies that people were born into determined the gender roles they were supposed to fulfill. Those gender roles, however, were created by the men of the society. In Blood Relations, Lizzie is pressured to conform to the feminine gender role simply because she has the body of a woman. The play chronicles Lizzie’s resentment of and rebellion against the male-structured ideology in an attempt to change what it means to be a woman in her society.
As the protagonist of the play, Lizzie Borden is faced with the stereotypes of women during her era. She was born and raised in the nineteenth century, when women were expected to be complacent daughters and obedient wives and homemakers. Lizzie, however, refuses to conform to those societal conventions despite the body she was born into. She is very headstrong throughout the play; her constant battle against societal norms constricts her life and ultimately leads to the murder of her parents. Throughout the play, the convention of “being a lady” causes conflicts between Lizzie and those around her, especially Mrs. Borden: “She’s incapable of disciplining herself like a lady and we all know it” (Pollock, 22). Mrs. Borden constantly badgers Lizzie throughout the play because Lizzie does not conform to feminine gender roles. From the beginning of the play, it is evident that women faced well-defined boundaries that they were unable to cross. Mr. Borden, Lizzie’s father, refers to keeping women in line as a task like “training horses”:
Now Andrew, I’ve spent my life raisin’ horses and I’m gonna tell you somethin’ -- a woman is just like a horse! You keep her on a tight rein, or she’ll take the bit in her teeth and next thing you know, road, destination and purpose is all behind you, and you’ll be lucky if she don’t pitch you right in a sewer ditch.
Mr. Borden believes that men ought to keep their women in line in order to stop them from interfering with their “man’s world.” Being born into a woman’s body during the nineteenth century limited the options available to an individual -- women were not allowed to do what men could. Lizzie, however, often refuses to do what the men around her tell her to do.
The constant discord between Lizzie and her father makes it evident that she refuses to adhere to societal conventions. Lizzie is constantly forced to listen to her father bring up the idea of marriage: “Just listen to me, Lizzie... I’m choosing my words, and I want you to listen. Now... in most circumstances... a woman of your age would be married, eh? Having children, running her own house. That’s the natural thing, eh? [Pause.] Eh, Lizzie?”. Because Lizzie is a woman, it is only “natural” for her to conform to the convention of marriage even if she is not interested in the suitor, such as Johnny MacLeod, an old widowed man. That convention appears to be quite one-sided: Harry, Mrs. Borden’s brother, does not seem to be married, nor is he pressured into getting married. Instead, he is commended for not having to bear any children: “You’re lucky you never brought any children into the world” (32). Because Lizzie was born female, though, she is considered a failure for the very thing Harry is being praised for. Lizzie, however, refuses to marry someone just for the sake of doing so. It is not something she naturally feels, and ultimately will not do despite wanting to please her father. “Papa? ... Papa, I love you. I try to be what you want, really I do, I try... but... I don’t want to get married. I wouldn’t be a good mother, I--”. The idea of being forced into motherhood is not something which comes naturally for Lizzie; she does not have the nurturing maternal instinct that she believes women meant to be mothers should have. When Mr. Borden speaks to Lizzie about marrying Johnny MacLeod, Lizzie refuses the idea and says that she does not want to be married or assume the role of a “housekeeper”. Lizzie’s natural instinct blocks her from “performing” what everyone else expects of her.
Lizzie recognizes that something is different in herself compared to the other females around her. She sees that she is nothing like her sister Emily, who is completely complacent and often adheres to the social norms of what it means to be a woman. Because of the contrast between Lizzie, Emily, and even Mrs. Borden, Lizzie questions herself and wonders if something could possibly be wrong with her:
Do you suppose there’s a formula, a magic formula for being a “woman”? Do you suppose every baby girl receives it at birth, it’s the last thing that happens just before birth, the magic formula is stamped indelibly on the brain Ka Thud!! [...] and through some terrible oversight... perhaps the death of my mother... I didn’t get that Ka Thud!! I was born... defective.
This quote perfectly describes Lizzie throughout the play. She was born into a body and given a socially constructed role for which she is not suited. All of the women around her have a certain perception of what it means to be a woman. Lizzie, however, defies all of these social conventions -- not out of spite, but because it does not come naturally for her to act the way society expects her to. Even if she tries to make her father happy, the part of her that rejects these social norms leads her to believe that she must be defective -- that she can only be considered normal by adapting to the gender role she was assigned when born a girl. That quote leads the audience to believe that if those who do not fit into the neat categories of entirely male or entirely female are “different” and should be considered as “outsiders.” Lizzie is segregated throughout the play to the point where she is made to feel alienated by even the closest members of her family.
This segregation by Lizzie’s family leaves her with more resentment and only pushes her further away from her assigned gender role. Naturally, during the late nineteenth century, women could not work, nor did they have the option to live on their own away from their families. In contrast, that is all Lizzie desires:
Lizzie: I want out of all this... I hate this house, I hate... I want out. Try to understand how I feel. Why can’t I do something... Eh? I mean... I could... I could go into your office... I could... learn how to keep books?
Mr. Borden: For god’s sake, talk sensible.
Lizzie strongly dislikes living at home around the very people who stop her from being herself; she is desperate to break free from the world in which she is confined. While Lizzie does appreciate the material comforts that her family provides to her, she ultimately craves the acceptance and encouragement to live her life freely. Instead, Mr. Borden constantly tells Lizzie to smarten up and “think sensibly,” as though what she is saying is completely ludicrous. At the time, however, Lizzie’s dreams were slightly farfetched. As a woman, she only had what her father or husband provided to her. Lizzie’s nonconformity hinders her ability to have what her father would naturally have given to her. She loses her property rights to Harry, and her inheritance slowly diminishes as she refuses the idea of marriage. It is as though Lizzie’s refusal of gender roles creates the necessity of punishment by her father as a way to shock her into conformity. Even Mrs. Borden, the woman who constantly quarrels with Lizzie, is aware of the inequalities between men and women: “You know, Lizzie, your father keeps you. You know you got nothing but what he gives you. And that’s a fact of life. You got to come to deal with facts. I did” (40). By saying “I did,” Mrs. Borden admits to having, at one point or another, questioned the gendered norms of what it means to be inside of a woman’s body; over time she inevitably learned to settle and conform to the societal conventions around her. The men surrounding Lizzie and Mrs. Borden are the ones who create meaning for the female gender. Therefore, Lizzie ought to listen to what her father tells her because, ultimately, he provides for her and financially supports all that she does, something she could not do on her own.
It is evident from the play’s use of symbolism that the female body is controlled by the men around them. Lizzie’s freedom to be who she wants to be is constricted by Mr. Borden. That relationship can be seen through the symbolism of Lizzie’s birds, which represent the freedom she wishes to have but is unable to attain. The birds have the ability to fly away, but they are constricted by the cage in which they are enclosed. The cage represents society’s conventions, which restrain Lizzie from “flying away.” Lizzie’s father is aware of what the birds mean to Lizzie, and he tries to protect them from others: “It’s those little beggars next door. Hey! Hey get away! Get away there! ... They break into the shed to get at my birds and Papa gets angry” (28). Similarly, Mr. Borden tries desperately to protect Lizzie’s “differences” from others who want to break into her cage. In a strange way, it is almost as though he understands Lizzie’s conflict and has sympathy for her. In many parts of the text, he scolds her for being the way she is and immediately after consoles her by saying, “There Lizzie” (38). The symbolism of such exchanges is that in a male-dominated society, women have only as much freedom as the men around them permit:
Mr. Borden: If Lizzie puts her mind to a thing, she does it, and if she don’t, she don’t.
Harry: It’s up to you to see she does.
Mr. Borden has the ability to constrict Lizzie because she is a woman, showing that females are a subordinate, powerless group. With the same power that Mr. Borden has to give Lizzie freedom, he also has the ability to take her freedom away. He realizes that although he may be able to protect her, the rest of society would ultimately not be able to understand her. Characters such as Harry and Mrs. Borden refuse to accept Lizzie and push Mr. Borden to constrict her. In fact, it is Harry who causes Mr. Borden to crack. After having an argument with Lizzie, Harry returns with an axe, saying that someone had gotten into the birds. Mr. Borden, furious with Lizzie because of their altercation, goes to the birds with the axe and kills them one by one in an attempt to kill her freedom and shock her into conformity. As a female, Lizzie only had as much leeway as her father provided her; her “freedom” as a woman is constructed by a man.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essaySharron Pollock’s Blood Relations is a play used to show how women are expected to live out their lives according to a preset formula simply because of the bodies into which they were born. However, Pollock uses Lizzie Borden as a way to push those conventional norms of what it means to be a woman. Women are not all the same, just as men are not. Some will not marry, while others go on to have many children. Inheriting a woman’s body does not provide preset guidelines of how one ought to live. Instead, it provides a means to live depending on personal preferences. That is what Lizzie Borden longs for, and what she ultimately achieves only after the murder of her parents.
After a conversation I had with a UChicago admissions counselor at my high school, I knew that the University of Chicago would be the right school for me. I asked her my go to college question: “what, if anything, would you alter about your college or college experience itself?” Answers I received in the past had varying degrees of criticisms. Anything from wanting food that was actually edible in the dining halls to better opportunities for undergraduates to conduct research. After I asked her this question, though, she didn’t hesitate. She told me that UChicago not only “fostered her sense of self” but “allowed her to grow as an individual but more importantly, as an active citizen”. The community of UChicago is “eclectic” and “everyone compliments each other’s’ missing links”. Her last line though, is what still resonates with me today.
Get original essay“At UChicago, I had the ability to just be me and I knew regardless of my opinions or beliefs, I I had a community that would support me.”
I dream of becoming a part of the University of Chicago community for my college journey. From speaking with the admissions counselor, I know UChicago is the only university that will encourage my out-of-the-box thinking. Although I want to pursue a career in Creative Writing, I also want to study astronomy and psychology so that I can further debate the theory of relativity and have a conversation with Malcolm Gladwell on the importance of vulnerability. With a third of my time at the college being dedicated to studying the core curriculum, I’ll construct a solid academic foundation for me to grow upon throughout life and my career as a novelist.
The flexibility the college offers students by exploration through the core curriculum is another reason I’m applying. UChicago’s small class sizes offer the perfect space for me to grow as a writer but also as an engaged citizen. If offered admission, I’d love to apply skills gained through a creative writing concentration to work on Sliced Bread and Bite Culinary Magazine. Sliced Bread especially caught my attention; any publication where poets speak of their carb obsession is somewhere I want to write!
Additionally, I’m interested in UChicago’s Paris Astronomy Program. Having never been abroad, the opportunity to delve further into my astronomy hobby through classes like Exoplanets with Professor Leslie Rogers is exciting for me. The emphasis on exploration and curiosity in one’s education through the core curriculum, rather than just fulfilling a large amount of core requirements is another key reason UChicago stands out.
I look forward to conversations about Nicolas Sparks’ best novel (it’s Dear John) with physics majors, debates with political science majors about Pluto’s planetary existence, and performing in an acapella group with biomedical engineers. I’m not sure why people say the University of Chicago is “where fun goes to die”, because from what I’ve encountered, it’s not truthful. I’ve never heard alumni who were so inspiring or read of such an engaged student body that are determined to make a lasting impact in society. This a community I’d love to become a member of.