100% Secure Payment
© 2025 Copyright:
BoutEssays. All rights reserved
Is Atticus a good father? In this essay it is a topic of much discussion. To be a good father, one must provide love, guidance, and discipline to their children. In the classic novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, Atticus Finch is a prime example of a good father, as he demonstrates love, patience, and kindness towards his children Scout and Jem. He instills important values such as empathy, respect, and justice, and encourages his children to think for themselves. While some may criticize Atticus for his parenting style or for exposing his children to difficult situations, it is clear that his intentions are always pure and he does everything he can to protect and support his family. Therefore, it can be argued that Atticus is indeed a good father.
Get original essayThroughout the story, Atticus shows he is a great role model for Scout and Jem. He stands up and fights for what he believes in. For example, even though most of the white neighbors disapproved in Atticus’ support for Tom Robinson, an African American, Atticus knew Tom Robinson was innocent and stood up for him in and out of the courtroom. Mr. Link Dias says, “-don’t see why you touched it in the first place...you’ve got everything to lose from this Atticus. I mean everything.” to which Atticus responds by saying “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till the truth’s told...and you know what the truth is.” Atticus knew the truth and continued to stand up for it even though he was frowned upon for accepting a case in favor of a negro. Secondly, Atticus shows he is a great role model by acting the same to everybody. Miss Maudie tells Scout, “Atticus Finch is the same in his house as he is on the public streets.” Atticus treats everyone with the same amount of respect, even behind closed doors. This is an important trait Atticus has, especially for influencing Scout and Jem. It teaches them that they should treat everyone equally.
Another reason Atticus is a good father is because he loves his children and makes sure they are safe. A good illustration of this is when Scout, Jem, and Dill find Atticus at the jail, being harassed by Mr. Cunningham’s mob. Atticus knew that it was too dangerous for the kids to be there, so he tried his best to keep them safe. “Go home, Jem...take Scout and Dill home.” When Jem refused to leave, Atticus walked home with the three children. Atticus shows he loves his children by taking the time to work with them. When Scout told Atticus that she no longer wanted to go to school because she got in trouble for being literate, he tells her, “If you’ll concede the necessity of going to school, we’ll go on reading every night just as we always have. Is it a bargain?”. Even though Scout’s teacher told her that Atticus did not know how to teach, and Scout must stop learning at home, Atticus knew what he was doing and taught Scout that it is okay to do what she loves, and it is okay to read every night. He did it because he loves her and knows what’s best for her.
Atticus is a good parent because he teaches Scout and Jem many lessons throughout the story. An example of one of the lessons he teaches was that you should never judge a book by its cover. He said, “If you can learn a simple trick, Scout, you’ll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from their point of view, until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.” This was an important lesson that Atticus demonstrates all throughout the story, especially since he supported Tom Robinson in his trial. Another lesson Atticus teaches Scout is not to be conceited. “Atticus had said it was the polite thing to talk to people about what they were interested in, not about what you were interested in.” (Lee 205). This is an important lesson to teach children, so they will grow up being the best person they can be. www.healthyplace.com states that it is important for parents to “Explain how empathy is the ability to sense the feelings and perspectives of others, and to use that sense as a guide in relationships.” Atticus taught Scout a very important life lesson in the story.
In conclusion, though Atticus may make some mistakes as a parent, overall, he is a good father. He shows he is a good father by being a great role model for Scout and Jem, loving his children and by making sure they are safe, and lastly, by teaching them many important lessons throughout the book. Even though people may disagree with the way Atticus parents his children, he is a great father and loves his children very much.
Jane Austen voiced the contextual issues of her time through literary techniques in her book Pride and Prejudice, written during England’s Regency period. Austen was a writer who lived from 1775 to 1817, and wrote six major novels, to appraise and observe society as she knew it. She did this through the use of techniques such as circumlocution, satire and pedantic characters. She employed circumlocution to portray issues with class, satire to critique matrimonial ideals and pedantic characters to comment upon the unrealistic expectations of women in upper classes, which she believed to be relevant during the Regency Period.
Get original essayAusten used circumlocution as a literary technique to voice her opinions of class as a contextual issue in her society. Austen heavily criticized how in Regency England, class was a determining factor of many aspects of a woman’s life. Mr Collins’ attachment to Lady Catherine de Bourgh can be explained by his understanding of this, and how he knew it would be beneficial for him to have relations to those in the aristocracy. “…respect which he felt for her high rank, and his veneration for her as his patroness, mingling with a very good opinion of himself, of his authority as a clergyman, and his right as a rector, made him altogether a mixture of pride and obsequiousness, self-importance and humility.” In this extract, Austen used circumlocution, a technique where the speaker uses an excessive amount of words to make a point that could have easily been conveyed briefly. People of the upper classes utilized this frequently to uphold superficial civility and etiquette. This also demonstrated how people of different classes were expected to act, thus expressing how Austen applied circumlocution as a literary technique to express her views of class as a contextual issue in her society.
Austen used satire throughout Pride and Prejudice to portray her opinions on marriage as a contextual issue. She believed marriage to be a contextual issue because of how it was often for insubstantial reasons, such as gaining land. She used Charlotte as an example of what people in higher classes thought of marriage in Regency England- as a means to gain status and wealth, shown through the quote: “Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance.…it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life.” Satire is a writing style where the author critiques people or ideas in a humorous way, to make a political statement and in this excerpt, Austen ridiculed Charlotte and those with similar matrimonial ideals. Charlotte expresses that happiness in marriage is only through luck, and that she will not marry for love, but for wealth and status, and she ends up marrying Mr Collins. Using satire, Austen allows a character that believes in facile marriages to marry unhappily, lightly criticising those who share Charlotte's beliefs regarding marriage. This is how Austen uses satire to comment upon marriage ideals in Regency England.
Austen used pedantic characters to voice her criticism on expectations of upper class women, as a contextual issue. She believed this to be an issue because while men could play cards and gamble constantly, women were expected to be skilled in different aspects to attract a husband. Austen portrayed this through Miss Bingley’s pedantism, saying: “A woman must have a thorough knowledge of music, singing, drawing, dancing, and the modern languages… and besides all this, she must possess a certain something in her air and manner of walking, the tone of her voice, her address and expressions…”. A pedantic person is someone overly concerned with minor details, which describes the general social attitude towards higher class women. Austen used pedantic to express her view on the unrealistic standards women were held to. In Pride and Prejudice, multiple characters hold these views, such as Lady Catherine, Miss Bingley and Mr Darcy (at the beginning of the novel). These characters are seen as bothersome, as they caused issues and intervened unnecessarily, so by creating exasperating characters with pedantic views of higher class women, Austen mocked those who think of women as such. Through this it is shown how Austen conveyed her view on women of higher social status through pedantic characters.
Through the points presented above, it is evident Jane Austen used multiple literary devices in her book Pride and Prejudice to voice contextual issues of her time. She lived during England’s Regency period, and utilized techniques such as circumlocution, satire and pedantic characters to express her views upon contextual issues. She applied circumlocution to appraise class, satire to criticize superficial and shallow marriage ideals and pedantic characters to express her views on the highly unrealistic expectations of women with high social status- issues that she believed were important and appropriate to the time period during which she lived.
In Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, the author uses her protagonist, Howard Roark, to represent the ideal man. Roark is characterized as static, passionate about architecture, and indifferent towards others. If he displays benevolence, it is because it benefits him and does not detract from his identity. Rand’s philosophy depicts selfishness as the way, but while promoting it, she discredits altruism. However, both are important. A balance can be found through recognizing altruism’s place in society.
Get original essaySelfishness is seen as immoral. Time spent on one's self can be spent helping others. However, there are different forms of selfishness that Ayn Rand does not expand on. There is one-sided selfishness, neutral selfishness, and two-sided selfishness. Acts such as robbery or murder can be considered one-sided selfishness. These are iniquitous because they are beneficial to no one while also harming others. The criminal gets what they want but the repercussions, such as jail or guilt, outweigh the positive. Neutral selfishness is something that has no negative effects. Spending extra time in the mirror because one wants to be attractive does not hurt anyone. Two-sided selfishness is when both parties benefit. Swapping lunches can suffice as an example. In The Fountainhead, Roark displays neutral selfishness when he says, “My work done my way. A private, personal, selfish, egotistical motivation. That's the only way I function. That's all I am” (Rand, 580). This is what Rand lauds. Selfishness is a part of Objectivism. Each person should be treated as an individual, not a whole, and reason trumps religion. People need to think for themselves and put themselves before others. There is no “for the greater good” in Objectivism. Roark shows this through his career. He says, "I don't intend to build in order to have clients. I intend to have clients in order to build" (Rand, 26). He continually squanders opportunities because he lives by this belief system. Eventually, it pays off, but only as modernism rises and people learn to accept his work and the conditions that come with hiring him. In Roark’s testimony, he shows that selfishness is what caused progress and everyone else are just parasites, living off of the creators while simultaneously persecuting them. He says, “He had left them a gift they had not conceived and he had opened the roads of the world...The great creators — the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors — stood alone against the men of their time. Every great new thought was opposed. Every great new invention was denounced. The first motor was considered foolish. The airplane was considered impossible. The power loom was considered vicious. Anesthesia was considered sinful. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered and they paid. But they won” (Rand, 737). This shows that egotists are to be thanked for all inventions because they came to be through one person's ideas; they “served nothing and no one.” Roark attributes creation to selfishness because “only by living for himself was he able to achieve the things which are the glory of mankind. Such is the nature of achievement.” Why is it bad to be selfish? Because people said so. They have come to believe that the whole is greater than the individual without realizing that the whole is built off of individuals and it is each person’s unique abilities that allow society to function successfully. Objectivism can definitely be favorable, but as the saying goes, there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. The creators had amazing ideas, but they created for themselves. The “parasites” are what allowed society to advance because they shared the ideas of the creators. Selfishness alone is not ideal.
The antagonist of this story is Ellsworth Toohey. Toohey represents society- he works for the whole, not the individual. His belief system is run by altruism, the practice of selflessness. Rand shows this as a negative idea through a conversation Toohey has with Peter Keating. He says, “Tell men altruism is the ideal. Not a single one of them has ever achieved it and not a single one ever will. His every living instinct screams against it” (Rand, 635). Toohey is explaining to Keating how he controls people. To be selfless is not a part of their nature, but man likes to think he is invincible. To break the soul is to break the man, and the soul is broken by giving him something impossible to achieve. People are born selfish. It is “a law of survival.” Throughout time, though, selflessness became praised as men were “taught that their first concern is to relieve the suffering of others. […] To make that the highest test of virtue is to make suffering the most important part of life” (Rand, 680). Soldiers say no man left behind. Religions preach that people give to the poor. Sports display cooperation and teamwork, but what constitutes one thing as being profane versus another being righteous? Typically, gain. Someone helps someone else because that person may return the favor in the future. People feel as if they are upright when they volunteer. They are helping others, yet there is personal gain involved because mentally it sits right with them. Katie, for instance, becomes a social worker because she enjoys helping others and she believes it is right due to the ideology Toohey preaches. So can these acts really be considered selfless? To be selfless is to be concerned more with the needs and wishes of others than with one's own. The best example of a selfless person is a mother. Their job is to nurture and to care. There are so many stories of mothers who give up their lives for their children. Selflessness is a charitable idea. The main negative factor is that it is hard to achieve, but society could definitely use more selfless people. Katie was not jocund because she tried to be something that she was not. She lost a part of herself in following her uncle. Becoming a social worker was not truly a selfless act due to the reasoning behind her becoming one. Altruism is admirable because it helps others. Rand assumes that one would loses themselves when putting others first, but this not always the case. The whole is equally important to the individual.
Some may argue that it is one or the other. However, Rand fails because she tries too hard to make Roark the champion when the ideal person knows how to be an individual and conform when it is needed. Selfishness is not the epochal, but neither is selflessness. The world is all about balance. It needs both. Not good, not bad. While it would be optimal to not have nefarious people, action is only taken and flaws are only noticed after something has happened. Change is a reaction. Wrongdoings are needed to serve as an example. They are needed to be the defining line between right and wrong because “we cannot know what will be right or wrong in a selfless society, nor what we'll feel, nor in what manner. We must destroy the ego first. That is why the mind is so unreliable. We must not think. We must believe.” Nonetheless, too many selfless people are not desriable. After all, no betterment would come if all mothers died for their children. There would be far too many orphans. On the other hand, if everyone was selfish, then society would not have been allowed to come as far as it has. People tend to work well together. Even the best inventions became better once someone improved upon them. Cell phones are a great example of that. One idea became better as it was shared with the world and more people put their own spin on it. The Fountainhead pushes Objectivism over altruism. It is not one or the other, though. They both serve a purpose.
Selflessness and selfishness are both important parts of our world. Rand was a failure not because she argued for selfishness but because she argued against selflessness. Life is short. People should be allowed to live their lives without judgement. It is up to the individual to decide what philosophy, if any, they wish to live by.
Overall, I enjoyed the piece but I felt there were a handful of moments that were unreasonably silly and took away from being fully immersed in the story world. The production quality, as would be expected of a BBC Radio 4 piece, was of high quality with each scene having multiple layers of complexity, combining both primary and secondary sounds to create a rich story world. The Mise en Scene syntagmatic choices made it easy to visualize what each place looked like and how the characters moved around spatially and within relation to one another through primary dialogic cues and secondary sounds of physical movement and acoustic perspectives. Even though I did not know all the characters names, I never felt lost and could easily create a unique image in my mind for each character. The piece executed this through use voice actors with a wide and diverse range and giving the characters personalities that were distinct, if not a bit archetypal.
Get original essayIn this analysis, structured by scenes and persented in chronological order as one would play the final piece, primary and secondary sounds will be examined in an effort to find trends, intriiseases and whether or not the script choices made this fictional dramatic piece more or less powerful.
Bad Memories begins with secondary diegetic sounds of crunchy footsteps upon leaves and gravel, denoting travel until we get to the creaky doors and the footstep sounds transition into the hard floors of a structure. This will quickly become a staple of the piece and is used abundantly throughout. Once the two male characters begin to speak there is a lot of reverb on their voices, in some instances it becomes a full echo, which gives the audience the sense that the indoor space is very large, with little to nothing on the walls to absorb the reverb. This coupled with the other secondary sounds of wind blowing denote that we are outside. Almost instantly, the sound combination is meant to connote a symbolic sense of spookiness, fear, and danger. It does this by playing upon the traditional haunted house and horror movie tropes that those living in the Western world have agreed upon through convention as scary.
At 0:59 our assumptions on the danger of the structure are supported with primary sounds from one of the two male characters denoting that a fire that occurred previously that caused some suspected structural damage and that it is unsafe to venture further. From their first exchange of words, it is clear that they are trespassing, which makes me assume they are doing so under the cover of darkness. Although we still do not have any names, based on their familiar exchange of primary sounds, the two males know each other, and it is clear that one is far more timid and frightened of the house while the other is more reckless and daring. The timid male clearly uses primary language at 1:19 to denote a warning to the more reckless male to “not go in there”. This use of primary sound, supported by the overall creepiness of the secondary sounds, comes with the symbolic connotation of impending danger and foreboding.
Visually, I draw upon my own experiences with what this might look like. Even though the two male characters are British, my mind conjures up woodlands and abandoned houses that I have seen in American horror films. Since we’re told that there was a previous fire, my mind also paints the wood of the home in black ash and a slight smell of charred campfire logs clinging to the fresher scent of a deciduous forest. The timeline of the first scene’s story feels present and happening as we are experiencing it. Scene 1 drops the listener into the middle of the action without any idea of who the characters are, where they geographically are, or what their motivations may be. Although we have to guess the backstory throughout this scene, the primary dialogue does do a great job of giving us enough verbal queues to know where the characters are spatially moving within the scene and in relation to one another. For example, at 1:08 the more adventurous male heads off away upstairs, where we get a distant perspective of his voice while we stay close to the timid male.
Finally, at 1:21, we are given one of the male’s names, Tom, after loud secondary sounds of crashing and wooden board breaking. Even though we have not had any investment or buy in for the characters safety or survival, the stress in the male characters voices along with the SFX builds tension and suspense. Perhaps only our curiosity of what happens next is exciting about having a potential deathly action happen so soon in the storyline or it could have been that throughout this scene a close perspective was used which help to create intimacy between the characters and the listener. Diegetic sounds of heavy breathing and creaking, structurally unstable wood follow the trajectory of escalating fear and danger for our characters until the climax of Tom falling through the floor and letting the listener know through primary sounds that he found a grouping of human bones. Before we hear Tom denote that there are human remains there, we hear a sparkling whimsical sound and then a faint female voice singing. This secondary sound is meant to indexically connote the presence of a spirit. Even though the two males do not respond to the sound, I believe we are meant to perceive this sound as happening within the story world, although in a production aspect it was added non-digetically.
We can also connote his terror through the tone of his voice and the urgency in which he demands help out of the bone pit. This scene closes with non-diegetic secondary sounds of gusting winds, banshees and unattached screams to signifying the transition, with a final fade to silence. The use of these sounds together happens in mulitple places in the piece and will be collectively referred to as “spooky secondary sounds” Overall, the paradigmatic choices of using classic haunted house sounds gives the overall scene a contrived and campy feel.
We transition into the second scene with secondary footstep sounds on tiled. This scene, which takes place in present day, uses acoustic reverb, door knocking, low murmmered calm chatting and typing to leads us to believe the character is in a professional office of some sort. Through primary dialogue we are presented to the next set of characters: a male with an air of authority who introduces himself as a law enforcement Detective Marquez and Rachel, the owner of the office, a female who specializes in audio recordings. Once Detective Marquez is inside Rachel’s office, the acoustic perspective is recording very close to both characters lending a sense of intimacy, and there is relatively no secondary ambient sounds until the detective leaves the office to give Rachel time to analyze the recorder. This pattern of close acoustic perspective of the charcters with little to no ambient secondary sounds while in Rachel’s office will continue throughout the entire piece.
Detective Marquez gives the audience a montage point of refernce via his primary dialogue apology to Rachel for arriving right before closing time and dives into the backstory at 3:13. Through this primary dialogue exchange between characters, the audience also gets the backstory of the haunted house, the overall story timeline up until that point, and male characters from scene one. Additionally helpful was the diegetic timeline Detective Marquez sets out for Rachel which lets us place the previous set of characters, house fire, and five dead bodies on a mental linear progression.
During this dialogue exchnage, we’re also introduced into the key characters we have yet to meet that make up the collection of bodies found in Scene 1: Jonathan, Imogen, and Matthew Blake, Philip Gibson, and an unidentified woman. Detective Marquez discusses the oddieties of the case and the increasing of Rachel’s sighs and forced exhalations of breath symbolicaly connoting interest, exasperation, and disbelief.
In a short amount of time, the audience has received a lot of information through primary dialogue and at 5:54 there is a bit of comic relief from Rachel as she orders a Grand Latte from Marquez. This scene closes with the appearance of the first secondary sounds we’ve heard in a while, the door slamming and the sounds of the tape recorder being rewound.
Knowing that Rachel is alone with the recording, we are privy to everything she hears. The sounds of the start and stop buttons being pressed with a distinctly audible clikc are recorded with a close perspective while the beginning sounds from the tape recorder have an intital layer of static adding on non-diegetically in post-production to help differentiant for the listener that they have transitioned into the story world of the recorded past of 2004. After roughly ten seconds of static layered audio, the audio from the recorder becomes clear and acoustically closer as we become more present in the story world of the Blake family of November 4, 2004. Creating this sense of intimacy with the deceased members of that house through shifting how the audio sounds to the listener helps us buy into the story, care about the characters, and even though we know the ultimate ending, makes us curious about how it came to be. This pattern hold true throughout most of the piece when we toggle between the tapes and the close acoustical perspective of Detective Marquez and Rachel’s voices and reverb of her office and therefore will not be mentioned again in this analysis until the scene breaks with this established convention.
In under a minute of play time, we move through a few hours in story time which is denoted by Detective Marquez returning to Rachel’s office with her latte, that he verbalized he would do in Scene 2. This paradigmatic choice in the script was a wonderful way to create a fast movement of time without feeling disjointed. Rachel accepts her latte with a sigh of frustration and aggravation, presumably in response to the last few hours she has spent trying to access the corrupted audio files, which she begins to play for Marquez.
On the tapes we hear primary monologue and dialogues and a host of clear ambient sounds of crunchy walking, birds singing, and Phillip Gibson denoting iconic cues for his surroundings being remote and in the woods. Since I now know the timeline of the story world, this version of the woodland is bright, sunny, and non-foreboding as it is pre-murder. The bird singing also helps to indexically connote daytime and symbolically denote spring or freshness. The feel of this scene is much more serene than the first time we were introduced to the Blake home. However, the unease retruns very quickly through the use of primary dialogue between Gibson and Jonathan Blake, when the seed of doubt on Gibson’s good intentions is sewn and then watered by Marquez and Rachel after stopping the tape as we tranisiton out of this scene.
As the recorded past is shifted into a more present feel, the reverberations connotes we are inside and indexically verbal references such as an offer of tea and the Blake boy Michael’s request for a snack connotes that the characters are spatially in the kitchen. The voices of all three adults are nervous with only the young boy’s voice sounding mundane.
With the introduction of Imogen and Michael Blake, this is the first time that there has been more than two characters in the Mise en Scene. With four characters, things could potentially get confusing but the producers made strong paradigmatic decisions in casting actors with very distinct voices so it is easy to identify each character.
Right before we cut back to Detective Marquez at 10:54, we hear the faint and distant voice of a fifth character who is verbally referred to as Bisa, the nanny. Her acoustic perspective is very distant, connoting her low level of importance to the story. Personally, I think adding a fifth character in a close perspective would have been too overwhelming for the scene.
Secondary sound effects support the dialogue that occurred at 12:03 when Jonathan invited Gibson to speak more privately in his study where our initial perceptions of Blake’s wealth are verified through primary dialogue. On the way to his study, dialogue sets the stage for the importance of the flooring while we experience an elongated length of footsteps on stone floors. Jonathan states he saved the old flooring from the previous home and we get a foreshadowing sense that this information will be important later on in the story because of the amount of time spent on such a mundane fact.
For me, I think the clearest indication that a new scene has started is at 12:24 where there is a deep, non-diegetic boom sound followed by the glittering, whimsical chimes, heavy wind, song birds, and ghostly howls we heard earlier in the program that symbolized the presence of a supernatural being. We hear these sounds again at 16:16 and 16:58. Since neither character present at the actual recording reacts to these sounds, we can assume that they are non-diegetic in a production sense. However, our living observers, Marquez and Rachel do react to these recorded sounds meaning they also have a diegetic place in the story. This fits into the common trope used in other stories and films of the supernatural where a machine is needed to perceive the presence of ghosts since humans are not capable of doing so unassisted.
We jump back into the recorded history and within ten seconds of Rachel pressing play, the deep booming secondary sound which is symbolic of doom, is heard as Gibson uses primary monologue to tell his recorder, “Something is here”. Now that Gibson has had a chance to play back his tape while hiding in the lavatory, he has heard the same disembodied mystery girl singing that Rachel and Marquez heard. The listener is meant to feel uneasy and spooked by this revelation, which is paired with a knock on the lavatory door that makes the listener jump at its unexpected loudness and close proximity.
In terms of montage, we are not sure how much time has passed or how Gibson got from Blake’s study into the lavatory since Rachel had just stated that over an hour and a half of the tape was corrupted. This scene has quite a few new secondary sounds to help support the mise en scene spatially positioning of the characters in the house: a flushing toilet, a squeaking door, footsteps, and a distant phone ringing with an equally distant Imogen calling to her husband Jonathan that a call has come through for him.
At this point, Jonathan’s voice is connoting unease with Gibson and you can feel the sense of suspicion rise as Gibson asks permission to wander unaccompanied around the home. We hear Jonathan quickly exit the scene as his quick footsteps become fainter on his way to the phone, leaving Gibson alone to explore the home.
This scene begins with the return of the deep boom and accompanying footsteps to indexical signal Gibson’s movement away from the lavatory and into the other parts of the home. We hear sounds of a video game, connoting that Gibson has entered into the young Matthew’s room. The deep symbolic boom of doom returns when Gibson asks Matthew about the mystery girl on the recordings.
As Gibson is interrogating Matthew the tone and pitch of his voice drop and become almost predatory. It is here, at 20:51, that you know that Gibson is not just a reporter and is definitely there with an ulterior motive. Personally, I felt uneasy in this scene, as he is alone with Matthew, and acting inappropirate. This is validated when Gibson’s voice returns to its professional cheerful demeanor when Jonathan runs into the room and when Rachel turns off the tape to say to Detective Marquez, “This guy is genuinely creepy”.
Before this scene concludes, the producers made an interesting paradigmatic choice in the script at 21:50 when they had Marquez inquire if Rachel had a husband. It was out of place, ovetly personal and irrelevant. This did serve to increase the awkwardness, but this was not revisted anywhere else in the piece and should have been removed.
When the tape is turned back on after the verbal exchange between Detective Marquez and Rachel, time has passed and the three adults are in a common area. We are cued into knowing that it is now dark outside and around dinner time through the primary dialogue of Imogen, Jonathan, and Gibson. Imogen’s voice sounds nervous as she tries to get Gibson to stay the night and Jonathan begins to think something is definitely amiss. During this scene we’re quickly toggling between the current present world and the recorded story world, which is a bit dizzying at times. Most of the same conventions are used to denote when we are in the recorded history world or the present world of Rachel’s office.
The multiple minutes of primary dialogue is recorded in a moderate acoustic perspective with very little secondary sounds as they adults argue over the true nature of Gibson’s presence there as a paranormal investigator. The lack of secondary sounds, argumentative dialogue but the presence of reverb, gives the listener a sense of tension as these three individuals particpate in a heated exchange in a small space. Gibson is recorded in a close perspective while he details the origin story of the haunting and the importance of the stone floor to the Blake’s, while the listener and the Blakes nervously hold their breath.
At 27:54, Rachel begins to argue with Detective Marquez because she has begun to believe in the fantastical nature of the story while Detective Marquez still believe there has to be a logical explanation for everything. Secondary sounds help us visualize that Rachel is working on equipment of some kind with a keyboard as she tries to filter some additional parts of the audio tape to play. The primary exchange between Rachel and Detective Marquez at this point connotes that they have been at this for a long time and are tired and frustrated.
Imogen is speaking privately with Gibson as they set up a recording device that will play back the sounds in real time on speakers. We continue to get the house reverb sounds, but as Gibson turns the speakers on we also get a short feedback reverb from the speakers themselves. During the last five minutes there has been a lull in secondary sound which may be to help prepare the listener for the onslaught of frightening sounds that must be on its way in this highly predictable supernatural drama that comes at 32:27 in the form of more spooky secondary sounds.
We are abruptly transported back to Rachel’s office and this toggle happens often and quickly in this scene. Rachel’s tone, pitch and strength of her voice clearly connotes that she is upset by what she has heard on the recording and given her expertise she verifies the validity of the terrifying sounds in the recording.
We hear the play button click and return to Gibson and Imogen with a small amount of time passed. Now that tension has been built, a cacophony of sounds bombards the listener. The overall volume increases as sounds of screeching and wailing fill the scene. This sound is diegetic as Imogen and Gibson are reacting with fear and terror.
Marquez gets a call on Rachel’s phone and is scratching notes onto a notepad, connoting that the information he has just received is going to be very important and he does not want to get it wrong. When he shares this information with Rachel and the listener, everyone gets chills as he reluctantly reveals the connections between Mary the person and Mary the potential ghost. Rachel’s voice continues to rise in pitch and speed, connoting her adjitation.
We leave the shaken Rachel in her office and jump directly into the story world of the Blakes. This time, the transition breaks with the pattern and goes directly into close, non-static sound from the recorded past, but it does use the deep boom of doom to delineate the transition. Through primary dialogue between Jonathan and Gibson, we learn that Jonathan has seen the evil ghostly girl and Gibson warns that “she is here”, so they return to the amplify speakers, and hear the ghost say “I’ve come home” in a classic spooky ghost way, one minute after she died in the real world of November 2004.
Just as in the last scene, we toggle between the present feel of the recorded past story world and the present story world of Rachel’s office, with cues of a button click letting us know we are returning to the recorded world. Rachel’s voice continues to escalate in terror and unease as the detective tries to calm her. Her escalating pitch and increase in words per minute speed connote that she is becoming increasingly anxious and demands her and the detective go to the crime scene. Of course this is denied and she plays the last recorded audio file which contains the anticipated supernatural screams of the ghost and the human screams of the family.
Spatially, the characters are spread far away from each other in the house and in proximity to the recorder. You can hear footsteps running away from the recorder as Jonathan goes to find his wife and son. Faint cries from the wife and son can also be heard in the distance. We can assume that Gibson has brought the recorder to where we are now in Matthew’s room. However, I find this a bit unrealistic because if someone was actually faced with something as terrifying as this situation, I hardly think they would stop to grab the recorder. Yet, the suspicion of disbelief has to occur to allow the story to continue.
A chaotic chorus of primary and secondary sounds ensues as the family attempt to leave the house but are trapped and we hear a slicing, juicy sound as Gibson is stabbed. The Blake family and Jonathan run down into the basement through a door that Jonathan verbally denotes, “shouldn't be there”.
Scene 10 ends with a fade to a brief silence, but we’re aware that it is still very late in the evening if we are to continue with the montage from the previous scene. We then hear a car drive up a gravel road and her shutting car door iconically denotes she has arrived alone at the Blake house and is greeted by the same imperceivable birds from before.
While exploring the home, the audience can see Rachel’s impending death before she does because of the noises Detective Marquez can hear over her phone when he calls her that she can’t. This scene and the entire piece ends on the viscerally disturbing cries for help and screams of agony as Rachel becomes the fifth body. Although we are led to believe we are listening to her murder in real time, there are no flesh wound or stabbing sounds.
Bad Memories was an enjoyable and easy listen, although the storyline was terribly predictable and at time contrived. Looking back, there was an over abundance of footsteps and classic haunted house sounds, but I felt it easy to follow the progression of characters in time and space. I could also easily visualize the different scenes and characters.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayThe most negative aspects of the piece for me was the formulaic use of the haunted house, killer little girl story that we have seen used in many blockbuster movies. I also had a real issue with the ending and how the final timeline came together. It seemed like too much of an easy choice to have the adventurous brave female be the only present day character to die because she did not follow the orders of a man and went somewhere alone. I think that trope is overused and boring. It was also a bit too beyond the acceptable reality of the story world that Rachel would be the fifth body, since the two male boys found the bones before Rachel entered the story. Up until that point, most of the supernatural elements of the timeline could be accepted given an acceptance of the supernatural. However, Rachel’s inclusion as the fifth body was just a bit too much.
Growing up in a Baptist church, baptism was concomitant with “becoming a Christian”. If someone got saved, they were baptized quickly thereafter. If not, they were heavily questioned about the delay, (which I do not believe is very loving…we should not pressure people into faith, otherwise their house is built too hastily without a solid foundation and structure to maintain it, so to speak.) In a sense, the reason for forgoing baptism might indeed be question-worthy, that is, asking why are they so reluctant; is it because they aren’t truly ready to hand their old life over, or perhaps they do not want their faith to be publicized?
Get original essayRegardless, I do not believe that [physical] baptism is necessary in order to see the gates of heaven and blissfully worship Christ for all eternity after death. The New Testament discusses that salvation is a gift from God, given by God alone… no work or action we perform is going to make a difference in our salvation, we are not that powerful. Romans 11:6, for example, states, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace (English Standard Version).” Thus, the ceremonial act of baptism is not required for one to be granted eternal life; it is practiced as an expression of faith and to make that faith known to others.
The word used for baptism in the Bible, ßapt???, means literally “to dip,” but metaphorically, it can also mean “to overwhelm” (such as with the Holy Spirit.) According to the Dictionary of Bible Themes, baptism means “A washing with water, which symbolizes the cleansing of believers from the stain and dirt of sin through the grace of God. Jesus Christ submitted to baptism as an example to believers.” The Jewish people participated in this literal baptism by way of “proselyte” baptism, which was the “cleansing” of a new convert. This practice was to be imposed until the reformation brought by the Son of God. John the Baptist is a well-known historical figure for being a great evangelical witness and partaking in the baptizing practice.
In fact, John 1:6-7 tells us specifically that he is a “man sent from God… a witness, to bear witness about the light, that all might believe through him.” John testifies openly without fear of judgment. God sent John to gather individuals into a people group of believers, to start building the kingdom of God on earth. According to Christ, John is given this authority by being baptized by God himself, (not by man.) This is indicative that saving baptism is spiritual, not the act of being dunked or sprinkled.
John Henry Paul Reumann, author of Variety and Unity in the New testament, emphasizes the idea of “variety in unity and unity in variety.” The physical baptism of believers demonstrates publicly their identification of a group or family separate from the rest of society, despite their diverse backgrounds. According to Ronald Cottle, “In the human body, which is essentially one, there are many members and they are differentiated by their functions. So the one Body of Christ into which we were all admitted by the one baptism of the Spirit also consists of a variety of members differentiated by the diversity of their functions.”
In Galatians 3:27, we read, “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” This would fulfill John’s mission to gather individuals into one unified family, and be affective in the world for God.
In the early church, theologian Tertullian gave six reasons for why baptism is an important practice: to show the forgiveness of sins, to reenact the deliverance from death, to demonstrate rebirth in Christ as a clean person, to express the gift of the holy spirit, to renounce Satan and a sinful life, and finally, to identify with Christ One post reformation theologian, Huldrych Zwingli, further pursued this idea of baptism being a symbol of Christian identity.
Particularly, he emphasized the distinction between “inward” and “outward” baptism. Inward baptism is of the mind and spirit and accomplished only by the Holy Spirit; it is an independent instance from physical baptism. Outward baptism is a sacrament: “an external sign by which people respond to what God has done…an initiatory sign which…pledges us to Christ….” Here he is saying that salvation has already been given; God has already done the deed, and baptism in water is just one way we respond to this glorious gift. It is one of our many ways of showing the alteration of our souls to others, and to spread the joy that comes with it. John Calvin gave two reasons for baptism: showing our faith to God, and demonstrating our faith to man, that is, “a symbol for bearing witness to man…, our confession….”
Modern theologians are also showing great interest in this subject, and for good reason: it has been overall under investigated. Reverend Anthony R. Cross claims most of those identified with the Baptist denomination insist on carrying out the practice, but deny it being a sacrament, that it is instead an order from God as something we must do (Which I have seen in my church.) Yet, those who do declare it as sacramental still practice it as if it’s the ticket into heaven. He goes on to boldly state “Baptists have been strongest on the subjects and mode of baptism, but weakest on what baptism actually means.” We encourage the practice, yet we have not a solid definition of what exactly that practice is.
Christiane Zimmermann investigated into the soteriology of baptism and salvation in the book of Titus, verses 3:4-6, “But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior….”
We see here that this passage uses our practice of water baptism to simply paint the picture for how the real process of salvation through the Trinity works. Zimmermann says that it is through the Holy Spirit’s “bath of renewal” over us as individuals that we are rescued into a community of believers. It is the spiritual baptism that saves.
Another point made in Titus 3:4-6 is the emphasis that there is no action that humans can do to save themselves. It is solely by God’s grace alone that we are given eternal life. This is a recurring theme in the Bible. We see it in many other verses such as Ephesians 2:8-9, “…by grace you have been saved through faith. ...not your own doing…so that no one may boast.” Being baptized may be an important witnessing symbol, but it is certainly nothing to hold over someone.
Galatians 2:21 tells us that if there were works for us to be done on top of faith, then Christ’s death and resurrection was all in vain, absolutely pointless. If we seek justification by the law, then we are not seeking Christ (Galatians 5:4.) For, the law is made by flesh, so it is weak and tainted as flesh; it’s strength does not compare to the mighty mercy and holiness of God (Romans 8:3.) The Bible reiterates all the former points repeatedly: salvation is through the grace of God and that alone.
John W. Schoenheit point to Acts 2 (the Day of Pentecost) and the remainder of the New Testament to support the idea that salvation is one’s spirit, not in an action. He states, “By the time Paul finished the…Epistles, the revelation of Scripter was very clear…the “one baptism” for the Christian Church (Eph. 4:5) was the baptism in the Holy Spirit.” The Epistles make clear that it is faith in Christ alone, apart from baptism in water, that truly saves a person.
One example of this is Acts 10, the first account of a true gentile being saved by baptism in the Holy Spirit, through Peter’s preaching. God had already accepted, manifested, and gifted the gentiles before Peter commanded water baptism. Peter says himself in 1 Peter 3:20-21 that baptism saves us, but not water baptism: “not the removal of dirt from the body, but the pledge of good conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
The final example I will be using is Luke 23:39-43, where we are given the story of the thieves crucified alongside Jesus. While one of the thieves questions Christ’s divinity, the other believes in his perfection as the Son of God. This thief acknowledges his own guilt and just treatment for his actions and also recognizes that Jesus is taking one for the team of all humanity on the cross. Because of his faith in Christ’s holiness, Christ says to him “Truly I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” This criminal was saved by faith, promised an afterlife with Jesus, without being baptized in water. Christ would not have promised him paradise if it were not true.
A good analogy for this scenario is the State Farm insurance commercial in which with State Farm customer’s agent appears, providing her with money for a handbag she really wants. A woman nearby sees this and tries it herself, although she does not have State Farm. When her agent appears, he is merely an old fisherman teasing her with a single dollar on a fishing line.
In this scenario, State Farm is water baptism, and the fancy handbag is the eternal afterlife. It is highly doubtful that God is going to say “Oh, you almost had it! You [gotta] be quicker than that,” while dangling heaven over our heads because (for whatever reason,) we weren’t dunked or sprinkled before death. If we have the faith to call upon God and trust in the Son, we are saved.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayReferring back to Romans 11:6 in the introduction, if there were an action of any sort that we, as humans, could do to enter salvation, grace would no longer be grace. Grace would be unnecessary. Christ’s death would be unnecessary. Salvation comes through the baptism in the Holy Spirit alone. The reason physical baptism is then deemed so important still, is not to save oneself, but to spread witness to others, and perhaps lead to the saving faith of someone else. We publically identify ourselves as devote Christians, renouncing the devil in the presence of both our Godly and worldly family when we are baptized in water. It is a symbolic reminder to ourselves that we are surrendering our life of sin. It is a visual representation that we have been born again in Christ, and are given new life.
Prejudice is a feeling that many people feel several times throughout their lifetime. Some experience it more than others, and I am definitely one of the lucky ones. I have only experienced strong prejudice a few times in the last seventeen years. The only time that I have really felt strong prejudice is against my gingerness. For some reason, gingers are not as common in today’s society, and some people do not completely accept them. I’ve been made fun of for being a ginger several times, but sometimes worse than others. Prejudice is a serious problem in today’s society that most people ignore or look passed.
Get original essayIn middle school, I had very red hair and a lot of freckles, the traits typical of a ginger. Some of my classmates made fun of me because I was a ginger, and even excluded the gingers from their lunch table. This made me feel really horrible, and I really didn’t know how to react. There were many of us, and some of the girls wanted to dye their hair to avoid the prejudice. However, some of us stuck through it. It eventually went away. Everybody who had been making fun of the gingers felt really badly about everything after the prejudice was all over, but it never was completely okay again. The feelings that the people who made fun of gave me and what they put me through is forgivable, yet unforgettable. I was able to forgive them, and I am friends with some of them to this day. However, I never forgot about how gingers are made fun of over something they can’t control, and that made me really think about all the other people that have been victims of prejudice. Even though it didn’t feel very great, it really made me feel empathetic towards people that have experienced prejudice.
Many people have gone through prejudice that was a lot worse than mine, and they probably experienced a lot more hardship than me. The prejudice I felt lasted only a few months, and it was because of a trait that I could have changed if I had really wanted to. I began to really feel for people that had to deal with prejudice for their whole lives. After this, I never wanted anyone to have to go through prejudice, and I protected people going through the same hardships as me. I will never put somebody through what happened to me. Furthermore, the experience of being fairly unjudged made me very sympathetic towards the victim of prejudice.
Being made of for being a ginger did not affect my life very much as for as having my feelings hurt. However it did completely change my perspective on how much prejudice can affect someone’s life. Victims of prejudice and be psychologically scarred for the rest of their life, if the prejudice eventually ends. It is no way to live a life, and nobody should have to go through this horrible thing. I hope one day that prejudice disappears, and that there is a peace upon this earth where everyone gets along.
Let’s keep the college lifestyle apart and face the bitter truth… What is college life? I don’t really know but almost everyone in the high school keeps saying it especially when they do something wrong. That’s when you will hear the popular saying “school life” which is used to mean that something which is wrong could have a consideration for the state of being a student. Why am I even writing this post one might ask? I’m doing this to lead you into the great benefits of being an honest student, not just for students but to everyone who wants his/her life saved being honest. Despite the fact that the majority of our parents train us to be honest at home and in our society but as we grow up we tend to deviate a bit or totally from it, thinking it will pay off good. Sorry, it does otherwise. Majority of the students in the tertiary institutions are teens and can easily get involved into things that are against the school’s rules and regulations but who is going to say the truth when the school management finds out, who is going, to be honest, to say things the way it happened?
Get original essayMany students see being honest as a daunting task and can tag dishonesty as an excuse. Such excuses are given to skip certain school punishments without knowing that increase in the frequency of use of such excuses will do them no good only to leave them as a bunch of liars in the end and it could be very late to turn the hands of the clock as it can easily become a habit to lie. Have you ever lied to your school teacher about homework? There are many ways students lie even beyond this. No matter what could be said for practicing such excuses, the truth still remains that one could not lead a better life with dishonesty. Dishonesty won’t take anyone anywhere far. If you have people around you who achieved what they are today through dishonesty, take a close look at them, you will find out it takes them no way. They rotate around a point all in the name of being in motion, to them they are progressing. Little or nothing do they know that being honest can take them beyond that current status they are even bragging about. You are reading this post right now because I decided to be honest with you and promised never to liar to you or even miss lead you. Being honest is what one can decide within self to be, as no amount of sermons can make you be honest if you have not made up your mind, to be honest. Being honest is what you can decide only when you found value in it, and that is why I have decided to share this piece with you, so you can see values that will leave you wanting to be honest in all you do even when it is too difficult to do so. So you really have to be honest with me, yourself, read and comment how this post relates to you and what is your next step to take in life as a student or a nonstudent. I will share with you life stories, and don’t get the title “how being honest as a student can save your life” twisted, not only for students, everyone needs to be honest. The society we are today seemed to become very hard on a daily, people in their own level of understanding will always devise means to make things work out for them, not minding how the other person feels.
This is very absurd… This is what they can also say when you try to correct their wrongdoing “shortcut” or “apian way”. What is “apian way” I can’t really say for sure what it means but almost everyone in my country keeps saying it? The “shortcut” as people who are not honest use, is a method of applying self-centeredness or excuses in all they do to reduce stress. I still remember the popular saying “there’s no shortcut to success” if you have heard about that and still being dishonest, can’t you see it is a big waste of time trying to achieve success by lying? Why are some students dishonest? Just as I mentioned earlier, many people use it as excuses which they will never admit as being dishonest a more preferable way of saying what they mean is “smartness”. How can lying make you a smart student? Have you ever thought about this and the record you will have for yourself when almost everyone will find out you have been lying? However, as you read this post, you might still be arguing within your mind “what are the benefits of being honest” if you’re guilty of this, I will reveal the benefits in the last section of this article. So long as the pursuit of personal interest without considerations for laid down rules and regulations exist, there’s this great chances of toying with honesty. I still remember back then in 2014, when I was the head boy in a public school. Where I was saddled with the responsibility of helping the school management put students in order and maintain a good academic environment as conducive as possible to foster learning alongside my other functionaries. Read Also: 17 Productive Ways To Read Without Sleeping (A Practical Approach) I faced some challenges which the very one I could remember vividly is “student’s dishonesty”. As at that time it is referred to as being a smart student, later on after secondary school days, I do see some of them in the town and I can tell the repercussion of what we call “school life” could be very dangerous in one’s life if proper care is not taken. Some students would come to the school very late, it has become very habitual of them and to some extent, they can claim to be sick when they are caught or even fake injuries on their feet before entering the school premises and walk briskly to school so they can skip punishments/charges against them. Finally, if it works out for them as planned, they are smart and not dishonest.
One of the major aims of the school is to train students to become responsible citizens of the state, to be honest, and stick to it even when all the available factors encourage otherwise. So if you fail to learn this, then you are not yet educated. You will need to know the difference between education and schooling. There’s no such thing as a “smart student” if you play tricks or give unnecessary excuses to run out of responsibilities. What I consider in my soul judgment as being a smart student is studying your books, shun exam malpractices, write and pass exams with high grades. This shows your level of smartness and understanding of what you are being taught in school. In What Ways Do Students Lie To Their Teachers And Parents? Students being dishonest, the major persons they lie to are their “school teachers and their parents“. There are many ways students lie, which I can try to mention only but a few of the students lie. Some students give excuses for failure to do a given homework or even claim they did it on their own whereas they didn’t even try attempting it, they have gotten help on it. Dishonest students cheat in the exam hall and even bribe some sick lecturers to write exams and make good grades. Some students have taken their parents as a payment machine, I have seen students collect extra fees from parents using forged school memos/text messages. Most of the time, students who failed to listen to the teacher while in class will always complain to their parents about how unskillful their teacher/lecturer is. They can even steal other students property and stand a strong denial of knowing the way about the missing item. Some students will claim to study their books, only when their teachers/parents are around and will while away their time if there’s little or no supervision.
The above is just to mention but a few, you can add more popular students lie in the comment section below. How To Become Honest And Save Your Life People who always lie to their selves and others would always ask the question “what are the benefits of being honest?” they do so not that they are yet ready, to be honest, but might want to know if it beneficial to other people who are honest. Being honest has a lot of benefits, who am I to mention all the benefits? Yes, I want to be honest… That’s if it is as easy as it sounds. Yes, you can be honest but this will take you some time and commitments to achieve. It is not something you can wake up one day and see yourself doing. You have to, first of all, decide within the mind, to accept the fact that being honest has a lot of benefits and you’re ready to share a part in such benefits and then begin to learn how to become an honest person. Being honest for some days can change your life, being more honesty will change your entire life and you will achieve great things with ease. If you really want to learn how to be honest, you need to carry out this little exercise: Be honest with yourself first, always tell yourself the truth. Avoid giving excuses for every little thing you do. Start being honest to people and things around you. It is not as easy as it sounds, but am very sure if you’re able, to be honest for a day, and keep on repeating it, you will see the positive impact after a while and even more as you continue to be honest.
The Importance Of Being Honest Honesty makes you courageous: This has a huge payoff but is pretty hard, to say what you feel, to express yourself, to choose to be honest and fearless even when others are against you. Honesty is the real you: Another way honesty can save your life is that it gives a real self-expression of who you are and reflects on how easy it is for people to believe you easily. I know you don’t like to be yet another fake person?. Honesty is a magnet: What you are, serves as a magnet and attracts others. Being honest has an enormous positive magnet that will draw other people who are honest to you and create a great connection flowered with love.
Saves you from trouble: There are instances that require you to only remain honest, even when you are at fault what everyone needs from you is just for you, to be honest and accept that you’re wrong. Your forgiveness is pretty easy when everyone can attest to what you said as the truth.
Filters mixed feelings: So long as you’re being honest with yourself and others around you, you will have less or nothing like mixed feelings, your feelings will always be straightforward and positive.
Honesty builds trust: No trust no business, I don’t think no one in his/her right senses will like to go into a business with someone who is not honest. Honesty builds trust among people across different discipline and creates a big link for business because trust exists through honesty.
Honesty makes your conscience free: When you say the truth, you will be free and won’t feel guilty anymore. In the words of Mark Twain, “if you say the truth, you don’t need to remember anything”.
Keep in mind:
This is only a sample.
Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.
Get custom essayConclusions: At what circumstance do you feel to lie is the only way out? How do you feel having something in your possession or skipping responsibilities by lying? Only if you feel alright and would be happy if it’s done to you, then we can consider lying, as a good thing to practice in the society. At this point, I believe you’re able to learn the benefits of being honest as a student and also non-student also able to acknowledge the fact that nothing could be said in praise of lying that makes it worth doing. A bitter truth will always be better than a sweet lie because in due time the truth will find its way out and everyone will learn what you have in the box all these while.
In Beowulf, translated by Seamus Heany, man’s perception of himself impacts his decisions to behave the way he does. Beowulf is a humble warrior who credits his prowess in battle to God’s divine intervention. He battled realistic and internal demons that started becoming a challenge because each encounter was harder than the last. His perception of his abilities as a hero transforms after every battle he successfully wins, causing him to believe he is unstoppable. Ultimately, Beowulf’s death in his final ordeal reveals that becoming too prideful can be the main reason to one’s downfall.
Get original essayInitially, Beowulf is a humble warrior, who attributes his prowess in battle to God’s divine intervention. Beowulf is a warrior who prepared himself to fight off Grendel to defend the land of Denmark, however he attributes his bravery as God’s gift. Before he does that, some of the warriors and the king all have a feast and talk, but Unferth warns Beowulf that Grendel will be a challenge and it will be difficult to handle him alone, but Beowulf insists that he is able to handle the task. While sitting with everyone at the table and talking about it, he explains to everyone that his “sword had killed/ nine sea monsters […] and hard ordeals he have never heard of”. Beowulf is boasting about how had the ability to kill off nine sea monsters easily with no problem and how there is no task too hard for him to do. Beowulf continues to acknowledge that there is no task too hard for him that he refuses to wear armour and bring weapons to the fight against Grendel, only to prove that he is not scared and he is just as dangerous and strong as him, which is unnecessary. His success changes his perspective, and although he puts his life in danger, he begins to think that his success is of his own doing. Beowulf has the confidence that he will be known as one of the greatest heroes or he will die trying to be. He was no longer doing it for the people. He was only doing it for his self interest. Beowulf was willing to pursue his glory at all cost. Once Beowulf defeats Grendel with no armour or weapons, he had this unrealistic look on himself that he could do anything. He starts to put himself in this dangerous battles to make himself look better and get a higher reward each time, which eventually catches up to him.
Beowulf battles realistic and internal monsters, which became a challenge because each one he moved onto was harder to face than the last. Throughout the poem, Beowulf fights against several different demons. When Beowulf arrives to his last battle with the dragon, he was unable to defeat it and there was where he fell. The other demons were easy that he knew what he was doing and everything, but the dragon was difficult. Beowulf had “rather not/ use a weapon if he knew another way/ to grapple with the dragon and make good […] as he did against Grendel in days gone by”. Each of the demons that Beowulf has fought, symbolizes something that is considered to be Beowulf’s internal demons. The first battle with Grendel represented envy, but Beowulf was able to overcome that. The second battle with Grendel’s mother represented revenge and he was also able to overcome that one. Unfortunately the very last battle with the dragon represented greed and pride and Beowulf could not defeat that one. Beowulf allowed his greed and pride to get the best of him and be the cause of the end of his life. Greed and pride has always been in Beowulf and it was only a matter of time before he showed it. To some, Beowulf is considered to be a hero, but to others he is not. Showing the relationship between how people can be a hero and a villain at the same time, Beowulf showed that. Regardless of how he tried to hide it, that notorious side of him cannot be shut out because it was a part of him.
Beowulf’s perception of his heroic ability is transformed through every successful battle he faces, eventually leading to his belief that he is invincible. After defeating not only Grendel, but also his mother, Beowulf feels as if he is unstoppable and he can defeat anything that comes him way. After the dragon drastically destroys the home of hundreds of people, Beowulf is immediately summoned, however no one believes he should fight the dragon alone. Even though he has killed two threats before, the dragon was nearly impossible to do by himself. The other warriors of the land offered their help, but “the prince of the rings was too proud to line up with a large army”(lines 2345-2346). Beowulf was so caught up in his past ordeals, that he was unable to see that he needed help. He did not treat the dragon as a threat, but as something that would be simple and quick. Beowulf had not thought of how strong the dragon was compared to his old and weak body. The pursuit of glory was still on Beowulf’s mind and he did not realize that he had already obtained glory. So instead of fighting the dragon alone, Beowulf’s next goal should have been to prepare the person who was next up, but he did not want his glory to dim and he wanted to keep the legacy of being the greatest warrior there ever was. Only when trying to keep that, he ends up losing his life a lot sooner than expected.
In organic variables following parts (infection, microscopic organisms, growths and parasites) cell culture, human endoparasites are incorporated. These segments have harming impact on wellbeing.
Get original essayThere are a few elements which decides the progressions of populace bounty, for example, food,water and space. Population develops twofold when boundless assets are present. K chosen species have capacity to make due in natural that have less number of assets and more rivalry. K chose species have solid rivalry, duplicate in seniority and deliver less number of species then r-chose. Change in ecological conditions influences population elements Ecological components changes with the progression of time. In such kind of changing condition people population additionally change i. e a few living beings can not manage serious ecological conditions i. e high temperature, low light and so forth and neglect to survive. This reason population restriction. Direction of population by natural and physical variables Population plenitude is influenced by organic and physical components.
For instance on the off chance that we need to control the number of inhabitants in types of intrigue then we need to control the number of inhabitants in that species which have negative impact i. e contenders, predators and illness. So populace wealth can be kept up by plenitude of people that advantage the types of intrigue. In any case, a few needs species which is known as symbionts. Symbionts are helpful i. e corals utilize nourishment by symbionts zooxanthellae and in remuneration they get asylum and sustenance from corals. Populations are not controlled by organic factors just, physical components are additionally imperative e. g water accessibility and temperature control population development.
Population is controlled by winnowing and translocation of the regenerative capacity. Population development is additionally controlled by sustenance supply which is an ecological factor Following are the critical biotic factor which control the population elements
Both quality and amount of sustenance is imperative in controlling populace growth. For precedent Snail require a situation which is wealthy in calcium for their proliferation. They can not imitate in condition which have low calcium. Snails development does not relies upon nourishment wealth but rather it depends calcium level. This mineral is basic for shell development.
So when calcium is less snail population will diminish.
At the point when quantities of prey ends up more prominent then predator will discover their prey effectively. In the event that population of predator diminish then population of prey increments. So this is imperative for populace control. CompetitorsSome living being requires same assets as required by different creatures. So this diminish the population development. For instance light is essential to all life form. Rivalry for propagation additionally control population thickness.
Parasites are the host subordinate. It takes its sustenance from the host and cause illness. Because of illness regenerative rate lessening and population is control.
Temperature High temperature supports quicker enzymatic response and expanded development rate. Due to this population is increased. And low temperature supports moderate enzymatic response so development is diminished and population is controlled.
Oxygen expands the vitality creation by breath. As people get more vitality from oxygen the population rate increments and if people get low vitality from oxygen population will diminish.
Development of tissues is diminished by poisons, for example, sulfur dioxide. Poisons additionally influences on regenerative capacity i. e estrogen like substances. Density factors Birth (natality), passing (mortality), immigration and migration are the four essential natural occasions that impact the size (thickness) of a populace. This relationship can be communicated in a basic condition:
Change in Populace Density = (Births + Immigration) - (Deaths + Emigration) Every single other factor (both biotic and abiotic) apply their effect on population thickness by affecting (at least one) of the factors on the right-hand side of the above condition. Such factors, known as optional environmental occasions, may influence the recurrence, degree, greatness, or term of an essential biological occasion. Chilly winter temperatures, for instance, could build mortality and diminish population thickness. Then again, low predation rates in the late spring may expand natality and enable the population to develop. Most optional biological occasions go about as "populace controlling elements". At whatever point they constrain a population from achieving its greatest regenerative potential, they are viewed as "ecological opposition". Auxiliary natural occasions can be partitioned into two general classifications: thickness free factors and thickness subordinate elements.
Independent Factors Incorporate occasions or conditions, regularly climate or atmosphere related, that influence all people similarly, paying little heed to the general populace thickness. A hard stop, for instance, will slaughter a similar high level of the potato leafhoppers in an agriculturist's shelled nut field - regardless of if the populace contains a couple of hundred or a couple of million people. In another species, high temperatures as well as low moistness may have a comparative, non-particular effect on mortality. Ideal climatic conditions can positively affect populace thickness the same amount of as ominous conditions can have a negative impact. Hatchlings of Japanese insects, for instance, flourish in years when sufficient summer precipitation keeps soil conditions wet. Other thickness autonomous occasions may incorporate rapidly spreading fires, sea tempests, or hail storms. For a sea-going species, a low grouping of disintegrated oxygen or a blaze surge after overwhelming precipitation would qualify as thickness autonomous occasions in light of the fact that a little populace would endure indistinguishable percent mortality from a vast populace.
Thickness Dependent Factors Incorporate occasions or conditions that adjustment in seriousness as a populace's size increments or decreases. It incorporate predation, parasitism, and malady (one species misusing another). An extensive, thick populace, for instance, is normally more powerless to the spread of parasites or infectious ailment than a little, inadequate populace. Predators frequently adjust to changes in the thickness of their prey populaces by moving into territories of high prey thickness (numerical reaction) or by concentrating fundamentally on the most copious prey species (conduct reaction).
Accordingly, substantial and little populaces have a tendency to endure diverse rates of predation. Rivalry for constrained assets is likewise thickness subordinate - every a lot of the "pie" diminishes as a populace develops numerically. In a little populace, individuals may confront rivalry for the most part from people of different species who utilize similar assets (interspecific rivalry). In expansive populaces, be that as it may, rivalry may likewise originate from different individuals from similar species (intraspecific rivalry). In either case, rivalry undermines survival and propagation. Any physical quality or social adjustment that diminishes or disposes of rivalry is probably going to be supported by regular determination.
Lead generation has become the backbone, to the growth of all established business. First of all, getting a few concepts clear will help you to understand, how businesses generate more sales for lead generation.
Get original essayWhat is Lead? When an individual or a customer shows any form of interest in the favor of the company, which may consists of its product or the services of any sort, that individual becomes the Lead. It is also the contact information or the demographic information of a customer having interest in the product and services of the company.
There are two types of leads:
The strategies by which Business generates sales from lead generation:
The top listed strategy, by which the business generates sales from lead generation, can be seen in the effectiveness of it manifested in the increase of sales in a company.